- Joined
- Jan 20, 2007
- Messages
- 31,985
- Reaction score
- 11,774
Exactly, you can't counter the evidence provided.
Good One!
You Burned him big time.
That isn't how the burden of proof works
start with a legit source and then we will cross that bridge.
Oh shit. Another good one.
The evidence is provided, if you're too lazy and/or stupid to read it, that's your problem.
Shit, find me a single credible news source nowadays...
(Though the hill has been pretty down the middle).
Like we like to say in Germany: "Die mühlen der justiz mahlen langsam aber sie mahlen"
Roughly translated: The windmills of the justice system grind slowly, but they grind.
That applies to everyone, not just the Trump camp.
Still waiting...
Read the fucking information you lazy fuck.
You just suggested that the forensicator was a better source than the NYTimes. You lost the debate several posts ago dipshit.
LMAO, are you claiming that it wasn't a Russian hack?Dispute his findings.
And the nyt is dogshit.
LMAO, are you claiming that it wasn't a Russian hack?
I've seen all that shit months ago. It's garbage. No compelling evidence of any kind to refute the Russian hacking theory.The dnc was a leak, or someone on the east coast. Read through the article I posted.
Dispute his findings.
And the nyt is dogshit.
...Where I'm sitting, cnn looks worse than russia.
I've seen all that shit months ago. It's garbage. No compelling evidence of any kind to refute the Russian hacking theory.
sig worthy
Somebody give me back my fucking hot dog gif, god dammit!!!Cnn got multiple cops killed. That's worse than anything Russia did in 2016.