- Joined
- Apr 24, 2019
- Messages
- 94
- Reaction score
- 130
Great topic as I'm currently watching stuff from 97 and on (basically any significant fights from any promotion in chronological order as most is either on ufc fight pass or youtube/dailymotion). I know those times quite well already but watching this like I would watch an old series makes me really get deep into "who was what" at a certain point in time. I also discovered the "wayback" part of the website "the internet archive" where you can go on a website as it was at a certain point in time. I tried the few Sherdog entries for 1999 (some parts can't work as the internet archive doesn't have the database but just hyperlinked screenshots").
Anyway, to answer that question, I have to say I don't really know how he actually is "rated" by fans. I have said several times that Royce is among the most overated fighters of all time for these two reasons:
1- because there were a lot of BJJ black belts who could have done the same in the UFC (check out the desafio night in which Bustamante, Gurgel and Ismail dominated the Luta Livre guys in 1991 to get an idea).
2- he went off before tougher competition arrived as he basically fought for a little more than a year (nov 93 to apr 95). Now to be honest, I don't think the first 4-5 UFC featured many top talents and I doubt Royce would have done well in '96, just check out what Don Frye did to Bitteti (a legit top bjj black belt at the time) that year.
I wanted to point out my point of view before assessing your points.
Now, to be fair, he beat Ken Shamrock, Kimo and Severn before they were really into mma. (as far as Pat Smith, he has never been anything, so I would have pointed Remco Pardoel as Royce's 4th best win). So to me, this just like saying Corey Nelson is underated because he beat Volkanovski in 2013. It doesn't mean anything because they were basically learning something Royce already knew thanks to what his family among other Brasilians have done over the last 60 years at that point. So, I would say Royce was good, nothing crazy or unique though in terms of skills, basically, he, as well as a lot of other guys, were way in advance compared to most north american fighters
I'm more into your second point about what Royce has been able to do against nice competition in the early 2000. Now, to be fair, 2000 was just 5 years after he went out of the UFC. So I would not call this "past his prime" in terms of abilities, it's just past his greatest accomplishments.
The second thing about that is that mma maths don't work. A can beat B, B beats C and C beats A. That's why we say "styles make fights" as if you pick the right opponents, you may find your way out of potential loss. I don't think he would have done well against a guy who would decide to stay on his fet and had the wrestling to do so. Fair enough he lasted long and did pretty good at first against Saku and Yoshida, but then again, nothing utterly impressive to me.
I guess, the whole thing comes down to the fact that he has been praised so much in a very UFC marketing/Gracie biased way that some fans may want to counterbalance it and say he was "average" at best. I think Royce was good, I mean, he was among the top bjj guys, and he fought mma (or no hold barred should I say) back when a strong bjj background was enough. But as I can name a lot of equal or better fighters from those years, some who didn't have the opportunity because they were not "Gracies", along with the fact that his great years only lasted a year and a half against beginners mostly... I mean, I can't say "his performance were impressive", I mean, it was, but from ignorance. Put Any of Carlson's top pupils at that time and they would have done as good as Royce if not better.
Anyway, to answer that question, I have to say I don't really know how he actually is "rated" by fans. I have said several times that Royce is among the most overated fighters of all time for these two reasons:
1- because there were a lot of BJJ black belts who could have done the same in the UFC (check out the desafio night in which Bustamante, Gurgel and Ismail dominated the Luta Livre guys in 1991 to get an idea).
2- he went off before tougher competition arrived as he basically fought for a little more than a year (nov 93 to apr 95). Now to be honest, I don't think the first 4-5 UFC featured many top talents and I doubt Royce would have done well in '96, just check out what Don Frye did to Bitteti (a legit top bjj black belt at the time) that year.
I wanted to point out my point of view before assessing your points.
Now, to be fair, he beat Ken Shamrock, Kimo and Severn before they were really into mma. (as far as Pat Smith, he has never been anything, so I would have pointed Remco Pardoel as Royce's 4th best win). So to me, this just like saying Corey Nelson is underated because he beat Volkanovski in 2013. It doesn't mean anything because they were basically learning something Royce already knew thanks to what his family among other Brasilians have done over the last 60 years at that point. So, I would say Royce was good, nothing crazy or unique though in terms of skills, basically, he, as well as a lot of other guys, were way in advance compared to most north american fighters
I'm more into your second point about what Royce has been able to do against nice competition in the early 2000. Now, to be fair, 2000 was just 5 years after he went out of the UFC. So I would not call this "past his prime" in terms of abilities, it's just past his greatest accomplishments.
The second thing about that is that mma maths don't work. A can beat B, B beats C and C beats A. That's why we say "styles make fights" as if you pick the right opponents, you may find your way out of potential loss. I don't think he would have done well against a guy who would decide to stay on his fet and had the wrestling to do so. Fair enough he lasted long and did pretty good at first against Saku and Yoshida, but then again, nothing utterly impressive to me.
I guess, the whole thing comes down to the fact that he has been praised so much in a very UFC marketing/Gracie biased way that some fans may want to counterbalance it and say he was "average" at best. I think Royce was good, I mean, he was among the top bjj guys, and he fought mma (or no hold barred should I say) back when a strong bjj background was enough. But as I can name a lot of equal or better fighters from those years, some who didn't have the opportunity because they were not "Gracies", along with the fact that his great years only lasted a year and a half against beginners mostly... I mean, I can't say "his performance were impressive", I mean, it was, but from ignorance. Put Any of Carlson's top pupils at that time and they would have done as good as Royce if not better.