Hey man. I was gonna respond to your tattoo post with some extra recommendations, but the event started haha. I liked those artists you posted though.
All good, i figured it was hard to answer considering the event, lol.
Glad you liked them!
I'm from Argentina, grew up there, but I've been in the US for 7-8 years. So, I grew up playing, watching and following soccer fanatically. Ever since I moved to the US I've stopped following it so much.
I admit I was being slightly trollish. But I do believe most of what I said. If someone finds women's ball sports entertaining, cool. I don't for the most part, and it's not because of sexism. I grew up watching the highest level of competition in a sport with the biggest talent pool in the world. When I watched some highlights of the women's games, the talent and athleticism level was laughable. This is the same reason I don't watch male second and third division games nor care about them.
I think people underestimate the athleticism involved in ball sports, and the difference in the size of the talent pools. Both these factors are huge. Non-athletic games like pool are still separated by gender, so maybe there's some of what you say too, although I'm sure there's some underestimated physical factors in it. I think women do well in competitive shooting though, where all that matters is pure mental timing and calculation, and the gun does all the physical work.
Oh interesting! Yeah, almost no way one doesn't play soccer a lot in such a country, similar to germany probably.
Yeah you worded it a bit ruthlessly, haha, but i essentially agree i think.
The athleticism in ball sports is underrated for sure, i 100% agree.
People get all crazy (and understandably so) about these massive american football players and these giant NBA players being fast as f*ck but underrate the hell out of soccer players.
If you're somewhat familiar with the amount of cardio soccer requires (i know you are, but people who've not played it not so much, lol) at the very highest level and look at the top speeds many of these top guys run kinda casually during a game on grass, it's mind blowing.
I guess you're familiar with Erling Haaland? The guy is 6'4"/194cm and is so f*cking rapid, it's absolutely bonkers. Mbappe (though a rather small guy) too is blisteringly fast, it's not even funny.
Obviously the big NBA and NFL guys would smoke the above mentioned guys when it comes to strength, but then again a guy like Haaland or Mbappe (or most top level football player in one of the top five leagues) would dust pretty much any NBA and NFL player in a 5k or so...
What i think especially us-american people underestimate in regards to ball sports is the actual limb-eye-coordination required (I'm saying "limb-eye", because while "hand-eye-coordination" is the usual term, it's not completely accurate, since the brain doesn't differentiate between hands and legs in that regard, so height aside, someone who's technically brilliant in soccer would've also made a technically brilliant basketball player).
These guys seem to see the ball move in slow motion; they operate on a whole other plane than regular people.
I personally know people who've played against future bundesliga players, world class players (when the latter were young) and even alongside worldcup winners and eventhough these people i know are technically proficient players in the leagues they play in (and have or had potential to make it pro) they'll tell you about these future pro's etc. that they're on a completely different level to the point its hard to describe.
That's why i always say (and i stand by this a 100%) that things like chin and mentality aside, top level soccer and basketball players would make insane strikers, as their brains and nervous systems are able to calculate and react to moving targets at absurd speeds and from my experience, this is something that can't really be learned; one can only get slightly better at it due to practice, but guys like Messi and Stephen Curry in ballsports or Anderson Silva in MMA are just born with that.
I will say though, that for striking in MMA, there's at least one more very important metric in regards to accuracy and timing and that is anticipation, but generally you can't really learn to "enter the matrix" and put dudes down with perfectly placed strikes mid movement, i think.
In ball sports these requirements for that kind of talent are even crazier, because not only do you need to be able to process and calculate the movement of the ball coming towards you, you also need to not just hit it/catch it in the right place, you also need to do it with just the right amount of force, because it'll bounce away otherwise, while a counter punch doesn't need an *as* perfectly weighed amount of force, i think.
Shit, i guess i got carried away<45>
What bothers me is that this Rapinoe broad wants to make it seem like sexism is the reason why her sport isn't as popular or doesn't get paid as much, which is a ridiculous idea. They get paid a higher percentage of what they generate, she gets huge sponsorships, and they claim they get paid less because of sexism, even though their team, globally, doesn't generate anywhere near what the men's team generates (by participating in the biggest sporting event in the world). I've encountered these types in real life. I'm not saying sexism doesn't exist, but her narrative is nonsensical and women eat it up. Her sport isn't popular because the talent level is poor. It's such an intellectually feeble position that it makes me sick, lol.
Fully agreed.
Sounds cliche, but i feel there's a lot of truth to the claim that across our modern society there's a trend of black and white or absolute thinking, where something is either absolutely good or absolutely bad (or true or false!) with nothing in between.
Anyways, cheers man, already wrote enough for today here, haha.