PEDs are semantics. Right. The added size, strength, recovery, and longer/harder training Cris got from PEDs is an agenda I'm pushing? Fuck you're missing the point.
Nope, you're the idiot getting destroyed here and it's hilarious. It is semantics because it doesn't change Yamanaka at all, regardless of who she fights. Come on, this isn't hard.
The point is, you can't count Yamanaka as a top win for Cyborg because Cyborg didn't win. It is a No Contest because Cris cheated. A no contest is not a win no matter how you try to spin it with straw man about Jane and Starbucks (wow what a shit argument that was). Of course Cris using roids doesn't do anything to Yamanaka. It was Cris taking them. Why you think PEDs had no bearing in the outcome of the fight is astounding.
I don't think you know what strawman means, not surprising. And the argument was perfect if you were a bit smarter and were able to comprehend better, as stated above, it doesn't matter who Yamanaka is fighting, she's still Yamanaka whether fighting Jane or Cyborg. The semantics part is bringing up the PEDs, which in any other conversation WOULD be valid, but here, with what is going on right now, it is not. Another example would be who Evan Dunham was booked against after he "lost" to Sherk. Is anyone really saying "Well he did lose, let's put him back." No, that's why your mental midget gymnastics right now are semantics.
Stop trying to, and failing to, push the goalposts back just because you are getting fucking destroyed.
You asked aquestion, I posted a quote supporting my position. It's clearly you who can't post intelligently, since your don't back any of your opinions with facts.
I used facts to show 135 has superior comp. Facts showing Cris needs Ronda, not the other way around. Facts why Ronda would be willing to grant Gina a pass. Facts showing Cris saying she can make 135.
Did I make claims that I needed to back up and didn't? Go ahead and show me where, I'll wait.
Oh? You backed up something that I never claimed? Go ahead and point out where I said 145 was better than 135. Go ahead, i'll wait.
Oh? I said Ronda needed Cyborg somewhere? I said Cyborg needed Ronda somewhere? Please show me where, i'll wait.
Oh? You once again showed you couldn't comprehend text and you don't know what a rhetorical statement is? Even after seeing it twice? You can't read well, simple as that. The thing with Carano/Rousey is a non-issue but since you are not intelligently discussing this you took that point and ran since. You did exactly what everyone knew you would and made yourself look stupid even after I said it was irrelevant. Good show.
When you get owned, you just resort to saying I'm pushing an agenda and not arguing intelligently. That is a strawman and an ad hominem, both if which are logical fallacies. It's you who is not arguing properly.
Rhetorics are a poor argument. Use facts, or I'll keep destroying you.
You are the only one getting owned here, and you know how everyone sees your bullshit? You just said "When you get owned, you just resort to saying I'm pushing an agenda....." Yet I said you were pushing an agenda before you think you "owned" me.
Once again using words you don't know. An ad hominem would be if I attacked you and not what you said. I have gone point by point and responded to each bullet you made, so nice try. Also, go ahead and explain what a strawman is then I will give you all the time you need to find it. Go ahead, i'll wait.
Rhetorics aren't an argument at all, lady. Did you even read? Did you even get where I said TWICE how it wasn't relevant? Of course not.
So, as I said already, you really are done here. You may have had success earlier with people who are just as dumb as you, which you have shown, but you are done now, lady.
You went into a battle of wits unarmed. If you wish to continue to make a fool of yourself then I have no problems toying with mental midgets like you.
Have fun getting destroyed again and again.