Jesus, you're a weirdo.
If you don't want to validate your cringe-worthy innuendo that you're some philosophical savant able to think in abstract ways that "commoners," to use your hilarious terminology, cannot, you should be able to explain yourself when asked to do so instead of getting defensive and continuing to hollowly pontificate. I'm not asking for a dissertation on Sartre, just that you produce what you advertise.
Also, I love "attacking my own beliefs." The fact that I'm asking you to enlighten me as to your wisdom should be evidence of that. And the fact that you refuse to elaborate on these vague allusions (I guess "illusions" might be the more proper homophone), is not my fault. It's the fault of you being a somewhat dumb kid who wants to self-aggrandize without putting in the proper heavy lifting to justify doing so.
*queue another accusatory post filled with ill-fitting words instead of a mere explanation of your genius*