I had:
Sheriff:
- imprisoned Little John and Robin Hood for unknown reason, +0.
- agreed to release them after sleeping with Marion, did so, HONESTY +1.
Marion:
- pleaded love for Robin, acted to his benefit, HONESTY +1, MORALITY +1.
- slept with the Sheriff, +0.
- confessed truth to Robin about how she'd freed him, HONESTY +1.
- left with Little John, +0.
Robin:
- imprisoned for unknown reason, +0.
- shames and abuses Marion for acting to his benefit, MORALITY -1.
Little John:
- imprisoned for unknown reason, +0.
- defended Marion and promised lifelong devotion, MORALITY +1.
Marion - 2
Little John - 1
Sheriff - 1
Robin - 0
I guess the most fundamental thing I'm committing to is approving Marion's deed and assuming it was self-sacrificing (i.e. the Sheriff wasn't a hottie and/or she didn't tend in the nympho direction). Since we don't know whether the imprisonment was justified without making assumptions based on previous exposures to the character names, I left it +0 either way (still exposing a hesitance to side with the law by default, but hopefully with a smaller bias).
Interpretation:
You are essentially a contented person, even if you consider yourself a little superior. You are moral by your own standards, for you believe that morality is what best suits the occasion.
Men: You are sexually uninhibited, more romantic than you may appear, and more dependent on the approval of others than you care to admit.
Yea, I guess that's alright.