I should know better than to pursue this... haha... somehow though... here I am.
If you say "Robin Black says that Nunes wins" then you have a point.
If you say "Robin Black is the same guy who picked Holm to beat Rousey & he's also picking Nunes to win" then you are insinuating that Nunes will win because Robin Black sayz so.
The words you choose have meaning beyond what you may or may not realize they mean when you wrote it.
You obviously didn't realize the that when you worded it that way.
That's so funny that you are picking Ronda after wording your thread that way. You actually worded your thread against your own pick. Your OP actually continues to back the same idea.
Why would you do such a thing? Further... why would you continue to back your wording after it so obviously is not as you intended?