Bisping was also more technical than Thales Leites, but he had a very tough standup fight that night, and Lawler is easily a better striker.Bisping is too big and technical. Condit pretty much beat Lawler. I have to think Bisping would do it easier. Too technical and high output.
I still think Robbie has the power to put anyone down...even at middleweighthow drastic is the power differential @ MW though?
Yeah but Condit utilizes a lot of kicks as to where Bisping is usually more of a technical boxer...I also think Condit is even more technical and dangerous than Bisping isBisping is too big and technical. Condit pretty much beat Lawler. I have to think Bisping would do it easier. Too technical and high output.
He certainly does, but Anderson couldn't find his chin. Bisping is smart enough to avoid the power. And don't post Andy's knee or H Bomb. I'm aware. Just saying statistically, Bisping would get it done.I still think Robbie has the power to put anyone down...even at middleweight
Yeah but Condit utilizes a lot of kicks as to where Bisping is usually more of a technical boxer...I also think Condit is even more technical and dangerous than Bisping is
I honestly think that would be the difference...don't get me wrong I like Bisping but let's be honest he isn't going to be champ longRobbie's defense tho
I like Robbie by decision in that fight
He'd just hurt Bisping more than enough with counters imho
True but I just like the stylistic match up because they're both not grapplers...it's the striking affair that sounds interesting to meBisping via "Robbie fights at WW for a reason"
True but I just like the stylistic match up because they're both not grapplers...it's the striking affair that sounds interesting to me
I think his power is "similar" to Melvin M's, good at any weight.I still think Robbie has the power to put anyone down...even at middleweight
This guy gets it^^^I think his power is "similar" to Melvin M's, good at any weight.