- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Messages
- 37,873
- Reaction score
- 28,238
People/ the media will just focus on the looting now rather than admitting that their country has developed some seriously deep social problems.
because they're journalists and journalists are lower lifeforms thanphiles.
They aren't focusing on the looting. They aren't even focusing on what happened or if the officer is innocent.
Every article just says "BLACK, BLACK, BLACK unarmed BLACK teenager killed for being BLACK" 1,000 times like they did with Trayvon because they're journalists and journalists are lower lifeforms thanphiles.
Drinkin'?
NO.. Just no. That is the same slipped in corporate propaganda of "Lawyers are scum." Without journalists and lawyers, WE HAVE NOTHING, no freedom, no voice, no way to compete with big money OR big government. Two of the most necessary jobs in the world, and two jobs that are slandered because the people who control things have the power to sway public opinion.
There are hacks in EVERY profession that are scum. I recently helped an 80 year old female Doctor who was living in squalor in a filthy office looking for people to sell drugs to, literally. I mean LIT-TER-AL-LEE. She was of course very upset the government wanted to look more closely at her records for what she billed Medicaid forMany doctors (private practice mostly, I respect ER docs a lot) and their drug dealing of the last 20 years are worse than lawyers, but they serve big money interests more than the little guys interest, so you can't talk bad about Doctors. Firefighters? I was a reserve FF in a former life, one guy sat around all day talking about "MAMBLA" (man boy love assoc.) all day and acting like scum, went on maybe 3 serious calls all year.. Can't evenrtalk about a FF, they protect big insurance money. Cops serve the masters, they are of course hero's.. But LAWYERS, LAWYERS allow little people to compete with the masters in the court of law on equal footing. They are SCUM. JOURNALISTS? They report on wrongdoings of masters from time to time, you can call them scum too.
TheHe's really just a bad poster. I've lived in real shit, mostly black neighborhoods, and the cops attitudes in those neighborhoods concerned me more than the crackheads. People have a real hard time believing that cops tend to treat people like shit in poor neighborhoods.
While it may be a product of conditioning (seeing the more violent crimes in said areas, seeing people dressed a certain way or a certain color more involved in gang related violence causing them to approach African Americans differently.) it still isn't an excuse. The riots are fucking stupid, but the news sensationalizing the riots instead of a kid being murdered is doing a good job of painting the real victim (the one that's been murdered) in a negative light.
Its a police state in america cops need to be held accountable for their actions
Too many cops running around with a license to kill
So this is an excuse for looting and property destruction?
Absolutely not
All people caught damaging the property in the area should be charged for the theft,vandalism and arson they did
But the cop should also be charged with murder for shooting a fleeing person 8 times who was 35 feet away from him
It is very easy to say rioters snd looters should be shot but something else to do it. I doubt anyone posting in this thread could hurt anyone. Also if that sort of shooting happened there would just by more violence and looting.
Not all looting is inexcusable.
Also many of the goods that are looted are themselves looted in the first place.
Police are rarely seriously punished for murders while on duty, and illegal forms of public pressure is often the reason that a few are.
Only people who there know what happened. Police always accuse their victims of attacking them or threatening them. Sometimes its the truth ,sometimes a lie. What do you expect them to say?
Not all looting is inexcusable. Also many of the goods that are looted are themselves looted in the first place.
Police are rarely seriously punished for murders while on duty, and illegal forms of public pressure is often the reason that a few are.
Only people who there know what happened. Police always accuse their victims of attacking them or threatening them. Sometimes its the truth ,sometimes a lie. What do you expect them to say?
If they came around my home or business I would shoot. If they wanted to keep getting violent then I would keep shooting. I don't have any sympathy for them.
I doubt that, unless you are a war veteran or something.
Anyway why take the risk? Vigilantism is illegal. You also might end up shooting a young child. Bullets ricochet. You would likely be arrested and tried if you shot someone. What makes you think shooting into a crowd is a good idea?