International Riot in Sweden.

Shouldn't burn the Qur'an. Shouldn't use violence as Muslims unless necessary and acceptable.

Respond to evil by doing good deeds to the evil doer.

Sorry for the late reply
Christcucks, everybody.

Bullies only respect one language, and washing feet isn’t one of them.
 
sweede posted that yes, imaams did preach that (maybe not "death" specifically, but rioting). Isn't that surprising, we all remember the outcries after "submission" was published, or after cartoons were drawn. Surely imams weren't telling their followers to calm down no?
Source please on the imams preaching?

As for the other stuff - my exp has been that imams can't/won't shy away from such issues but don't encourage violence. Thats my exp, I'm not saying some don't.
 
Don't apologize, probably better off avoiding these threads when tagged in them. Posters here aren't actually interested in a good faith discussion with Muslims, least of all the one who tagged you. They want you to self-flagellate in here.
Oh I'm used to dealing with that particular gentleman. He's not exactly difficult to deal with in fairness. But you're right, shouldn't entertain it but I didn't get the notif when I was tagged
 
Don't apologize, probably better off avoiding these threads when tagged in them. Posters here aren't actually interested in a good faith discussion with Muslims, least of all the one who tagged you. They want you to self-flagellate in here.
Don't segregate the WR breh. We're posters of peace.
Source please on the imams preaching?

As for the other stuff - my exp has been that imams can't/won't shy away from such issues but don't encourage violence. Thats my exp, I'm not saying some don't.
Read up in thread. sweede got some posts on it.
Maybe not explicitly, but there was even a famous video (might be removed from youtube now) that shows an imam in Europe saying if you're a Muslim then you agree with Allah's prescription for gays. Asked to raise hands those who agreed, everybody did. The threat is obvious, and seems like your ilk is very willing to carry it out wouldn't you say?
 
Don't segregate the WR breh. We're posters of peace.

Read up in thread. sweede got some posts on it.
Maybe not explicitly, but there was even a famous video (might be removed from youtube now) that shows an imam in Europe saying if you're a Muslim then you agree with Allah's prescription for gays. Asked to raise hands those who agreed, everybody did. The threat is obvious, and seems like your ilk is very willing to carry it out wouldn't you say?
Very willing? I suppose Muslims are lobbing gays off high buildings every other day all across Europe right? Lol

So you've recounted a time where an imam asks Muslims hey dyou believe homosexuality is a sin and the Islamic ruling applies and then they all said yeah we believe that. Ok not that surprising really given that Christians will agree with stuff in the Bible right?

The difference here is that there's an understanding that there is no Sharia state in Europe where Sharia can be practised. So the laws of the land must be obeyed without question.

Again not saying there haven't been imams who've encouraged stuff they shouldn't have.
 
Christcucks, everybody.

Bullies only respect one language, and washing feet isn’t one of them.
so-you-agree.jpg

Violence and force is an acceptable response to oppression?
Oh I'm used to dealing with that particular gentleman. He's not exactly difficult to deal with in fairness. But you're right, shouldn't entertain it but I didn't get the notif when I was tagged
Should've guessed, there's a reason he tagged you after all.
Don't segregate the WR breh. We're posters of peace.
Wow, reference to "religion of peace". Definitely did not see that one coming, good one.
 
Very willing? I suppose Muslims are lobbing gays off high buildings every other day all across Europe right? Lol

So you've recounted a time where an imam asks Muslims hey dyou believe homosexuality is a sin and the Islamic ruling applies and then they all said yeah we believe that. Ok not that surprising really given that Christians will agree with stuff in the Bible right?

The difference here is that there's an understanding that there is no Sharia state in Europe where Sharia can be practised. So the laws of the land must be obeyed without question.

Again not saying there haven't been imams who've encouraged stuff they shouldn't have.
Odd because the criminality among European muslims is yuge, and not just in violence but apparently according to this thread in blatant fraud and deception. Now they're rioting over someone burning their book.
I brought the gay vid as an example because even if they don't explicitly say "toss gays off rooftops", the implication is intolerance. Not many of these imam sessions are recorded so you can pretend to be ignorant, as usual. Christianity has evolved, obviously, bad comparison.
so-you-agree.jpg

Violence and force is an acceptable response to oppression?

Should've guessed, there's a reason he tagged you after all.

Wow, reference to "religion of peace". Definitely did not see that one coming, good one.
I try.
 
so-you-agree.jpg

Violence and force is an acceptable response to oppression?

Should've guessed, there's a reason he tagged you after all.

Wow, reference to "religion of peace". Definitely did not see that one coming, good one.
Yes it is. But of course not everything people are rioting about is actual oppression.

I wouldn’t mind some peaceful head chopping in Myanmar and China, where, you know, people are actually being oppressed and not in America and Sweden.
 
@Kafir-kun Are you making more racist stereotypes about me? Violence is always an option

I hope you’re not mistaking me for some cuckservative prick that thinks you’ve abandoned moral superiority by burning shit down. I didn’t say shit when those Minnesota rioters burned down a police station.

We spoke a few years back about legitimate terrorism and legitimate targets, like how Kurdish terrorists in Turkey bomb police stations and government offices or how Iranian terrorists attack American soldiers. Now obviously as an American I don’t like it condone attacks on our troops, and we have every right to drone strike them, but a soldier is a legit target.

But that’s quite different from looting the shoe stores for some fresh Jordans though
 
Yes it is. But of course not everything people are rioting about is actual oppression.

I wouldn’t mind some peaceful head chopping in Myanmar and China, where, you know, people are actually being oppressed and not in America and Sweden.
But some of it is? And if so are riots in response to those cases of actual oppression okay?
Please. Your sophistry is too plain to see, do better if you wanna defend the indefensible.
That's rich coming from the guy who defends scientific racism.
@Kafir-kun Are you making more racist stereotypes about me? Violence is always an option

I hope you’re not mistaking me for some cuckservative prick that thinks you’ve abandoned moral superiority by burning shit down. I didn’t say shit when those Minnesota rioters burned down a police station.

We spoke a few years back about legitimate terrorism and legitimate targets, like how Kurdish terrorists in Turkey bomb police stations and government offices or how Iranian terrorists attack American soldiers. Now obviously as an American I don’t like it condone attacks on our troops, and we have every right to drone strike them, but a soldier is a legit target.

But that’s quite different from looting the shoe stores for some fresh Jordans though
Nani?! A few years ago? But you joined this year, how can that be?!
 
But some of it is? And if so are riots in response to those cases of actual oppression okay?

That's rich coming from the guy who defends scientific racism.

Nani?! A few years ago? But you joined this year, how can that be?!
I don’t like riots because it just turns into looting, but some form of violence is OK. Damaging property of the “oppressor” for example.

The Boston Tea Party wasn’t about stealing British tea, they dumped it into harbors and set it on fire. I’m sure some people at some point stole, but it was led by people who weren’t opportunistic thugs and that was how it was lead.

Burning Qurans in a 1st world country isn’t oppression or worthy of a violent response. And I don’t share the view that it is needlessly inflammatory, because the same has been done to Christians and they’ve learned to deal with the fact people will burn and desecrate bibles, because it’s a first world country with secular laws and fuck you.
 
I don’t like riots because it just turns into looting, but some form of violence is OK. Damaging property of the “oppressor” for example.

The Boston Tea Party wasn’t about stealing British tea, they dumped it into harbors and set it on fire. I’m sure some people at some point stole, but it was led by people who weren’t opportunistic thugs and that was how it was lead.

Burning Qurans in a 1st world country isn’t oppression or worthy of a violent response. And I don’t share the view that it is needlessly inflammatory, because the same has been done to Christians and they’ve learned to deal with the fact people will burn and desecrate bibles, because it’s a first world country with secular laws and fuck you.
Tbh I mainly just want to post that Mean Girls meme but I appreciate the response nonetheless.
 
Tbh I mainly just want to post that Mean Girls meme but I appreciate the response nonetheless.
Yeah I was rather shocked that you gave me that response to that post because it was mainly a shitpost but I like debating anyways
 
Burning Qurans in a 1st world country isn’t oppression or worthy of a violent response. And I don’t share the view that it is needlessly inflammatory, because the same has been done to Christians and they’ve learned to deal with the fact people will burn and desecrate bibles, because it’s a first world country with secular laws and fuck you.
Burning your own belongings in a safe manner should never result in rioting and violence. Exposing such a mindset is a public service announcement. What next, killing people who write a book or draw pictures?

Such social norms don't belong in a free society and while I'm not a fan of it anywhere, I don't have an issue with it in places where the local population think it kosher. Sweden, most of Europe, or secular countries are not such places. When in Rome, and all that..
 
Burning your own belongings in a safe manner should never result in rioting and violence. Exposing such a mindset is a public service announcement. What next, killing people who write a book or draw pictures?

Such social norms don't belong in a free society and while I'm not a fan of it anywhere, I don't have an issue with it in places where the local population think it kosher. Sweden, most of Europe, or secular countries are not such places. When in Rome, and all that..
Yeah agreed, enlightened people only riot over football games.
473362_v2.gif
 
The difference here is that there's an understanding that there is no Sharia state in Europe where Sharia can be practised. So the laws of the land must be obeyed without question.

Again not saying there haven't been imams who've encouraged stuff they shouldn't have.
As for the other stuff - my exp has been that imams can't/won't shy away from such issues but don't encourage violence. Thats my exp, I'm not saying some don't.


With concern to your posts, you always end up in the form of "again not saying". I perceive this as someone who does not know the facts and guesses. Let me then assume that you are a Muslim. My question to you before I deny your claims(red color) is in what country and city do you live in? Do you have daily interactions with the local imams where you live?
 
Back
Top