- Joined
- Dec 18, 2012
- Messages
- 1,147
- Reaction score
- 0
You contradict yourself in the first 2 sentences. LoBosco was a very good college wrestler and he just KO'ed a a very seasoned vet with a beautiful head kick followed by brutal GNP. Rofi looked like a bad amatue standing with Glenn, it was actually pretty pathetic. Lobosco is a much more Complete fighter than Rofi and I dont see how anyone that has seen both of them fight could argue that.
Nobody beyond hardcore fans know who Lobosco is. The same can somewhat be said for Glenn, but I see no reason why Glenn should be fighting Lobosco at this point in his career. It would be a lose-lose situation for him. Glenn has 17 pro fights and over 15 amateur fights. He is likely 1-2 fights away from a UFC contract. Why would he risk all of his momentum against someone completely unknown like Lobosco. As for Rofi, his striking has never been his strength, so it's no wonder he struggled against Glenn.
Glenn has a good management team, and I highly doubt they would agree to a fight with Lobosco after his last 2 wins. Glenn was about to fight for the WSOF title. If WSOF thought Lobosco was the total package, why didn't they match him up against Georgi instead of signing Palmer? So, to reiterate my point, Glenn should not be fighting someone like Lobosco because it would do absolutely nothing for his career at this point.
Last edited: