Elections RFK getting roasted at presentation hearing

[Blayt7hh]

Hilarious seeing that fraud Sanders get exposed by RFK. The whole left shamelessly shilling for big pharma with not a hint of subtlety.

Yeah except for that quite literally didn’t happen and RFKs claims were immediately rebutted and were not factual. But hey you saw a cute social media clip that was edited to show you what you like

 

[HereticBD]

Yeah except that it’s a lie and the video is cutting out his rebuttal

His rebuttal was to deny that he took any money from big pharma, only to eventually concede and try to claim that 1.5 million isn't that much in the grand scheme of things.

"Yes, out of 200 million" was his final answer, when pressed on it after his lies fell apart.

 

[kflo]

You think of them as bridge players? Talk about not playing with a full deck.

Boomer alert!

 

[SuperLuigi]

Yeah except for that quite literally didn’t happen and RFKs claims were immediately rebutted and were not factual. But hey you saw a cute social media clip that was edited to show you what you like

His full response is posted in this thread and he didnt deny that what RFK said was factual, so why are you saying that?

 

[fedorthegoat777]

 

[Rob Battisti]

I love that Rand brought up Hep B. I brought it up here and was attacked as anti-vax with the same line of thinking as Rand.

Lots of smooth brains on this forum.

JFC this format blows.

 

[SuperLuigi]

TS do you know who RFK is? He is not stuttering because he is some loonie falling apart at the seems, he has a neurological condition. I would suggest listening to him explaining his unorthodox views and then drawing your own conclusions from there.

 

[HereticBD]

TS do you know who RFK is? He is not stuttering because he is some loonie falling apart at the seems, he has a neurological condition. I would suggest listening to him explaining his unorthodox views and then drawing your own conclusions from there.

Just wait until if/when he gets confirmed. He'll be "that retard who can't even speak properly" to the oh' so tolerant left.

 

[My Spot]

What a sad response thread from a prior ban.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Yeah except for that quite literally didn’t happen and RFKs claims were immediately rebutted and were not factual. But hey you saw a cute social media clip that was edited to show you what you like

Are you getting paid to gaslight?

 

[Yorick the Wiser]

You think of them as bridge players? Talk about not playing with a full deck.

Yea ok gramps.

 

[Andy Capp]

I love that Rand brought up Hep B. I brought it up here and was attacked as anti-vax with the same line of thinking as Rand.

Lots of smooth brains on this forum.

JFC this format blows.

What are you talking about? Do you support Kennedy for this position? I have missed whatever context there may be for this comment, admittedly. What about Hep B and who are the smooth brains?

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Hilarious

 

[Andy Capp]

Yea ok gramps.

You sound jealous we moved on from clay tablets.

 

[Yorick the Wiser]

hm, old speak doesn't resonate with me gramps.

splain

 

[Rob Battisti]

What are you talking about? Do you support Kennedy for this position? I have missed whatever context there may be for this comment, admittedly. What about Hep B and who are the smooth brains?

I took the position that someone isn’t “anti-vax” if they don’t wish to vaccinate their 1 day old infant against Hep-B if the mother isn’t a carrier.

Posters argued against that position. Some took the position that it’s possible that the sterilized equipment in the hospital could be infected with Hep-B or that Hep-B can cause liver disease.

I didn’t argue against Hep-B as a general vaccine for those who want it, but that a family that decides that their 1 day old infant shouldn’t get it does not make them “anti-vaccination”.

Rand Paul brought up the same point in the hearing.

 

[filthybliss]

Hilarious

Fellas, lets take left and right out of it. Do you want a Kennedy with brain worms in this role? He thinks lyme disease was biomanufactured weapon....

 

[Rob Battisti]

What are you talking about? Do you support Kennedy for this position? I have missed whatever context there may be for this comment, admittedly. What about Hep B and who are the smooth brains?

Funnily enough, it was you and @Sinister

 

[Andy Capp]

I took the position that someone isn’t “anti-vax” if they don’t wish to vaccinate their 1 day old infant against Hep-B if the mother isn’t a carrier.

Posters argued against that position. Some took the position that it’s possible that the sterilized equipment in the hospital could be infected with Hep-B or that Hep-B can cause liver disease.

I didn’t argue against Hep-B as a general vaccine for those who want it, but that a family that decides that their 1 day old infant shouldn’t get it does not make them “anti-vaccination”.

Rand Paul brought up the same point in the hearing.

Do you support Kennedy for this position?


Separately, what benefit accrues to a child when not vaccinated for Hep B?

 

[Rob Battisti]

Do you support Kennedy for this position?


Separately, what benefit accrues to a child when not vaccinated for Hep B?

I don’t know kennedys position on this. I was commenting on Rands point that it’s not “anti-vax” to have the delay of that vaccine.

What benefit accrues to a child of a mother who isn’t Hep-B positive to get it within its first day of life?