Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

[Prutfis]

Just take your L and move on, dork.

Or you can stick around and continue proving my point about self proclaimed "science" people, by having nothing more than empty insults.

You hypocrites can't even approach this subject scientifically. You're abject failures, in that regard. It's hilarious how little self awareness you people have.

lol. Sure buddeh. Tell us more about these FTL drives and "anti gravity" devices that you have proof of. The funny part is the staggering amount of science you have to be absolutely clueless about to actually think humans have FTL tech or "anti gravity". Quite mindboggling actually but not surprising coming from our resident bigfoot hunter. Guess someone had to take the crazy crown after TCBK got banned. Perfect display of Dunning Kruger on your part.

 

[shockaholic12]

What's a science denier?

Science people taking Ls all day in here.

@BearGrounds *adjusts his wig and big red nose*

"what's a clown?"

 

[BearGrounds]

lol. Sure buddeh. Tell us more about these FTL drives and "anti gravity" devices that you have proof of. The funny part is the staggering amount of science you have to be absolutely clueless about to actually think humans have FTL tech or "anti gravity". Quite mindboggling actually but not surprising coming from our resident bigfoot hunter. Guess someone had to take the crazy crown after TCBK got banned. Perfect display of Dunning Kruger on your part.

Thanks for doubling down and becoming an even more glaring example of the kind of dense individual I was referring to.

You're the reason Science is in the corrupt state that it's in. Bunch of anti-science people masquerading as followers of the method.

@BearGrounds *adjusts his wig and big red nose*

"what's a clown?"

​

 

[Prutfis]

Thanks for doubling down and becoming an even more glaring example of the kind of dense individual I was referring to.

You're the reason Science is in the corrupt state that it's in. Bunch of anti-science people masquerading as followers of the method.

​

Sure D-K sure. Maybe Bigfoot stole the evidence of "anti gravity" and the FTL tech.

 

[shockaholic12]

Thanks for doubling down and becoming an even more glaring example of the kind of dense individual I was referring to.

You're the reason Science is in the corrupt state that it's in. Bunch of anti-science people masquerading as followers of the method.

​

What do you think are like the the biggest 5 W's in modern times for the "non-science" people?

Just trying to figure out the teams and score you're talking about here. Apparently you're winning?

 

[BearGrounds]

Sure D-K sure. Maybe Bigfoot stole the evidence of "anti gravity" and the FTL tech.

Science person reduced to an illogical insult babbling machine in just a few posts. Gotta love it. Dude doesn't even realize he's making my point for me.

 

[Prutfis]

Science person reduced to an illogical insult babbling machine in just a few posts. Gotta love it. Dude doesn't even realize he's making my point for me.

Studies should be done on cases of D-K as severe as yours. Mr "anti gravity". Lol

 

[idrankyourbeer]

we have no idea what gravity is. we only have theories that can predict the effects of gravity to an astounding degree. the theory of gravity does not explain what gravity is though and it does not claim too either.

all i know is that i really fucking hate it when gravity stops working and i end up pissing all over my face and shitting all over the ceiling.

 

[Blayt7hh]

Sure D-K sure. Maybe Bigfoot stole the evidence of "anti gravity" and the FTL tech.

I don’t think there’s any way he seriously believes in Bigfoot. That’s just childish.

He’s also dead wrong about FTL travel. He’s confusing that with opening tunnels through the warp to shortcut through space. It’s highly dangerous though as it draws the attention of demonic forces

 

[dirtypablo]

Of course. We can see stars too.

Why are you not answering the question? You made a claim about the moon being bright, and I've given a counter to that that you refuse to acknowledge.

It's always the same strategy with you guys - make a bunch of absurd claims, and when someone tries to explain why you're wrong on any particular one, you just scurry off to the next one. If I chose to engage with your comments about stars, you would do the same thing, ignore my points and move to your next set of nonsense. The one other method often used by your types is where you'll shut down without providing any sort of answer beyond some variant of, 'lol you believe that!'

 

[dirtypablo]

Science person reduced to an illogical insult babbling machine in just a few posts. Gotta love it. Dude doesn't even realize he's making my point for me.

You made a concrete claim. Back it up. Where is the evidence for faster than light travel?

 

[WoozyFailGuy]

Lmao we need to get tito and him on a podcast for retarded ideas

I think he had tito on his jaxxon podcast

 

[Andy Capp]

From your article "The simple answer is the camera settings used to take most photos from the moon weren't designed to capture stars". Lol...that explains it hahaha haha.

What was Andy crap claiming again? Something something about lighting a candle and sticking it up your ass? Ahahahaha.

But yeah, the camera totally wouldn't be able to pick up bright lights in a black background. Hey, astronomy.com said it so we should all believe it. Ahaahahahaha!

You're hilariously dumb. This is fun. Give us some more.

Have you ever used a camera other than the one on a cell phone? Please tell us, what do you think this, "camera settings used to take most photos from the moon weren't designed to capture stars", really means in practical terms. What settings do you think they're referring to?

 

[Andy Capp]

Nothing you say explains why we cannot see stars in any moon pics or footage.

We can see stars from earth even though the moonlight is bright.

You are arguing that the earth reflects light back to the moon in a similar way so that's why we can't see the stars from the moon.
What would be the difference?

On earth, why do we have to look up into the sky to see stars? Why can't we see stars if we look horizontally at night? We can see the sun and the moon looking horizontally. All one has to do is watch the sun set.

Your argument is highly flawed.

This just in, a guy who thinks night time is just as bright as daytime.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

you flatties and globies have got it all wrong.

the earth is Thicc.

 

[Andy Capp]

How would one be able to decipher whether sunlight or the earth's reflection is lighting up the moon?

Because you can see the difference during a lunar eclipse.

I took this photo awhile back during a so-called blood moon event. The reason you can still see the whole moon, and not just the little part on the lower right that is still lit by the sun, is because of light reflected off the Earth illuminating it. [Edit: correction for the record, the correct explanation is here. Poor recollection on my part. This last sentence is still accurate, however:] The reason it is red is the same as why sunsets are red.

Notice how you can't see any stars?
Edit:

Anyone ever look up at a full moon at night? It's very bright. Now look at the moon through a telescope. Really really bright, maybe even blinding.

What happens when you move closer to any source of light? It gets brighter. Much brighter.

I'm surprised the actual moon that we supposedly landed on didnt have any brightness to it. It was just a big dark chunk of land.

[Edit: despite the correction above there is still no answer to this question from the flat earth knobs.] So what's happened to the moon in my photo? And what in the actual fuck is happening in this photo?

Is half the moon really far away while the other half is really close to us? And still no fucking stars? Whaaaaa?

 

[Deleted member 577981]

you flatties and globies have got it all wrong.

the earth is Thicc.

Only a fool could think the earth is shaped like a woman's ass..... That's obviously a big breasted woman with abbs ......

 

[Blayt7hh]

Because you can see the difference during a lunar eclipse.

I took this photo awhile back during a so-called blood moon event. The reason you can still see the whole moon, and not just the little part on the lower right that is still lit by the sun, is because of light reflected off the Earth illuminating it. The reason it is red is the same as why sunsets are red.

Notice how you can't see any stars?
Edit:

So what's happened to the moon in my photo? And what in the actual fuck is happening in this photo?

Is half the moon really far away while the other half is really close to us? And still no fucking stars? Whaaaaa?

I love this idea that NASA is smart enough to fake these pictures and write these clever sci-fi explanations, yet too dumb to think to shoop in a few stars. These people think they’re really that clever too for “getting them”.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

I mean , space is certainly not fake. But constant CGI photos of earth aren't helping people believe that.

There are plenty of authentic photos of space that NASA provides. There are CGI images as well but NASA is upfront about it and have never tried to deny when an image is CGI.

 

[OneOfOne]

Flat earth is a religion for uneducated Science deniers.

Science is a religion for indoctrinated athiests