Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

I see a couple of old dudes talking about hopes and dreams in that video i don't see any science.
I don't give a fuck what they're talking about because I don't give clicks to youtube randos so they can make money off dull people who'd rather be told what to think than learn for themselves from academic sources, like going to school.

I say again nearly all these dopes dropped out of school before grade 11 because they thought they were too smart for school to teach them anything.
 
No disrespect, but your questions don't make much sense.

Would you agree that cars built in 2024 are significantly more technologically advanced and safer than cars built in 1935? Does the fact that cars built today being more technologically advanced preclude them from being more technologically advanced simply because we still have car accidents today?

You could say the same of aeroplanes and the advancement of the turbine engine. Are they not way more advanced than a single engine prop plane simply because occasionally a modern airliner will crash?

Just because we can suppose that other civilizations might have way more advanced technology than us, does not mean they are perfect and never make mistakes or have mechanical failures. They are simply more advanced, but not gods.

So yes, it would make perfect logical sense to assume that IF there are non earth beings using incredibly advanced technology to travel through space to get to earth, that occasionally something might go wrong to cause them to crash.

It doesn't make a lick of sense. Commercial airliners which would be 10000x less advanced than a craft flying from another planet here faster than light have an 0.000414% accident per departure rate.

And a vast majority aren't even the airplane it's pilot error. So no a flying craft incomprehensibly more advanced struggling with simple gravity and falling out the sky doesn't make any sense. It'd have an exponentially better system for not struggling with gravity since it apparently found a way to become massless for faster than light travel.

Unless theres 100000000000 alien flights to earth happening in the last century and suddenly their tech regresses 100000x upon arrival, crashes don't make any sense.

This isn't comparing a model T to a telsa. This is comparing the first cart someone made in the dawn of civilization to the Falcon 9 and then claiming it would make sense the crew at space X forgot how to turn on their computers so the launch failed.
 
Last edited:
Except it's not an edit or a skip, you just keep saying that it is. You're the kind of guy being talked about here (with regards to Bigfoot, but it works just the same for UFO/antigravity craft).



No matter what video I show you, you'll nitpick it and cry "fake", while demanding evidence and saying "why has no one ever gotten one on camera?!".

Derp.

I mean the cut is observable. It’s there. You’re just in flat out denial
 
It doesn't make a lick of sense. Commercial airliners which would be 10000x less advanced than a craft flying from another planet here faster than light have an 0.000414% accident per departure rate.

And a vast majority aren't even the airplane it's pilot error. So no a flying craft incomprehensibly more advanced struggling with simple gravity and falling out the sky doesn't make any sense. It'd have an exponentially better system for not struggling with gravity since it apparently found a way to become massless for faster than light travel.

Unless theres 100000000000 alien flights to earth happening in the last century and suddenly their tech regresses 100000x upon arrival, crashes don't make any sense.

You're incorrectly applying human logic to the situation. Humans aren't comfortable using high-risk transportation methods, so everything is engineered to be extremely safe and idiot-proof. If something weren't safe for the public at large, it wouldn't be used period. Hypothetical aliens might not think in this way at all. Unlike humans, they might be very comfortable using inherently high-risk technology and transportation methods if it meant they could be more efficient. Alleged abductees describe the grays as being almost robot-like. This race might not give a rat's ass about how many employees, clones, pilots or w/e they are they lose. Maybe the pilots are low on the hierarchical totem pole and their lives are valueless. Maybe they just upload the entity's consciousness into a new body. The whole point of something being alien is that all your a priori assumptions no longer apply. This is very obvious stuff. Even people who don't believe in UFOs, don't believe aliens are real, typically can understand these concepts hypothetically, for example when reading a fiction novel.
 
I repeat, fucking youtube randos LMAO

You believe the plot of a Harlan Ellison short story is manifest in our daily lives. You think people should accept that there is no physical evidence of bigfoot skeletons because they're non-corporeal beings, not because they don't exist.

So, I don't give shit about your self-righteousness. If you want a serious reply drop the philosophizing and show me evidence.
Yeah total randos like this guy who appeared specifically because of the quality of the podcast...... lol.

You are a bad faith poster.

 
You're incorrectly applying human logic to the situation. Humans aren't comfortable using high-risk transportation methods, so everything is engineered to be extremely safe and idiot-proof. If something weren't safe for the public at large, it wouldn't be used period. Hypothetical aliens might not think in this way at all. Unlike humans, they might be very comfortable using inherently high-risk technology and transportation methods if it meant they could be more efficient. Alleged abductees describe the grays as being almost robot-like. This race might not give a rat's ass about how many employees, clones, pilots or w/e they are they lose. Maybe the pilots are low on the hierarchical totem pole and their lives are valueless. Maybe they just upload the entity's consciousness into a new body. The whole point of something being alien is that all your a priori assumptions no longer apply. This is very obvious stuff. Even people who don't believe in UFOs, don't believe aliens are real, typically can understand these concepts hypothetically, for example when reading a fiction novel.

All logic here is going to be human. There isn't another kind. Humans take risks on all sorts of transportation. This has nothing to do with a species mastering then totally fucking up gravity and mass at the same time inexplicably.

It has nothing to do with risk. If you're traveling faster than lights across galaxies you have mastered the technology around mass and gravity and advanced 1000000x beyond our technology surrounding those forces, our tech which currently holds a 0.000414% accident per departure rate. Arguing aliens mastered these forces then suddenly regressed an insane amount upon arrival doesn't make any sense.

If a space x engineer can build a rocket they aren't going to forget how to turn on their laptop on launch day.
 
Well, the thinking is that there have been crashed ships and we have possibly retrieved faster than light travel and reverse engineered it or else we have recovered ships that we cannot reverse engineer. So many sightings where people see ridiculously fast speeds from UFOs happen around military bases and so there's been that speculation and thought. I think based on the plethora of accounts from people today and even into the distant past, it is perfectly reasonable for a person to believe we have been visited by being from other dimensions or from outer space who have technologies that far surpass our own.

And I am supporting @BearGrounds. He knows that I don't agree with all of his conclusions about things and we've discussed that, but he is always able to discuss it without mocking and so we have a really wonderful relationship on that level. I don't agree with everything he says, but he has a keen insight into scientism, the religion of scientism that is growing in the world today. His assessment of that is often quite accurate and I'm going to support it when I see it.

@Blayt7hh you seem relatively new to this thread at the moment and you might want to go back a few pages and read my posts. There's a lot of context I think you're not aware of that I don't want to have to restate.
Yes I’ve heard the sci fi explanation and its nonsense. Maybe you’re new to the thread- but a few days ago I brought up Occam’s razor? Sure it’s not exactly a law of nature, but I find it works pretty well in this scenario.

The reality is that he, and other people who come up with these explanations, have already reached a conclusion that they want. These kinds of explanations are proffered when it runs into the obvious faults in their belief. They’re always filled with plugs to cover the holes in it. So a space ship crashed. The government covered it up with only a few people having seen it. This technology is so advanced that it would be like a jet plane crashing in ancient Egypt and expecting them to reverse engineer it, yet we were able to pull it off. Hell it would likely be even harder than that because it’s unlikely their logical thought processes would be the same.

And now we fly around it in complete government secrecy for reasons but don’t actually use it for anything? We don’t blip over to China and drop a bomb on a CCP meeting and blip back? We don’t travel the universe? We just show it off to a few loons here and there for the last five decades?

I’m about to write something else that annoyingly I’m sure you’re already aware of when you wrote your post, but wrote it anyways. When it comes to these sightings being reported around military sites, you have heard of confirmation bias I assume? I feel like you’re assuming I’m being exposed to most of this stuff for the first time but I don’t know why you would. We’ve all had the internet for and been on here for a while.

I don’t know what ascertations you’re in here defending from him, but itt he has some in and thought he was going to make a fool of everyone and then post a clearly fake video. Then he calls everyone frauds for not accepting his fake evidence as legitimate. In his mind science seems to mean accepting any evidence without scrutiny. And what exactly any of us are guilty of being fraudulent of, I’m not exactly sure since I’ve yet to see anyone in here claim they were a scientist
 
I mean the cut is observable. It’s there. You’re just in flat out denial

I went back and looked at it. I even found another video that's better quality.



It's not an edit or a frame skip, as I see it. I could be wrong, but, again, I don't think so. What it is, assuming it's real, is a light phenomena that takes place as a result of the field generated by the craft (as it moves off at superluminal speed).

You can't see something when it moves off FTL. It just blinks out, and presumably leaves that light signature (at least for this particular craft).

The image below should give you an idea of why it appears as a white circle (it's really a sphere):

alcubierre-warp-drive-overview.jpg
 
Last edited:
I went back and looked at it. I even found another video that's better quality.



It's not an edit or a frame skip, as I see it. What it is, assuming it's real, is a light phenomena that takes place as a result of the field generated by the craft (as it moves off at superluminal speed).

You can't see something when it moves off FTL. It just blinks out, and presumably leaves that light signature (at least for this particular craft).

The image below should give you an idea of why it appears as a white circle (it's really a sphere):

alcubierre-warp-drive-overview.jpg


better quality? The entire frame conveniently goes completely unfocused before it turns into ball of light .... lol it's potato quality footage. Then when it "blinks out of sight at faster than the speed of light" the frame goes completely white and stays that way for a full second which implies the light source didn't disappear faster than the speed of light.

Your little space ship drawing doesn't explain how the ship manages to be compromised of no mass which it would need to to travel at the speed of light forget faster. How does it stretch spacetime without having mass? How does stretching spacetime propel something on it's surface? Waves are not made by stretching things.
 
It doesn't make a lick of sense. Commercial airliners which would be 10000x less advanced than a craft flying from another planet here faster than light have an 0.000414% accident per departure rate.

And a vast majority aren't even the airplane it's pilot error. So no a flying craft incomprehensibly more advanced struggling with simple gravity and falling out the sky doesn't make any sense. It'd have an exponentially better system for not struggling with gravity since it apparently found a way to become massless for faster than light travel.

Unless theres 100000000000 alien flights to earth happening in the last century and suddenly their tech regresses 100000x upon arrival, crashes don't make any sense.

This isn't comparing a model T to a telsa. This is comparing the first cart someone made in the dawn of civilization to the Falcon 9 and then claiming it would make sense the crew at space X forgot how to turn on their computers so the launch failed.

I get what you are saying, in that it seems you are assuming that IF there are more technologically advanced beings traveling through space utilizing advanced vehicles, that they must be free from the constraints of pilot error or mechanical failures, meaning THEY have reached a point of perfection.

To me that just doesn't seem reasonable. You can be a million times more advanced, utilizing propulsion systems that defy all of our understandings of physics, without reaching the point of absolute perfection yet. IF we are being visited, we have no idea what the ration would be of craft that don't crash vs. those that do - and I realize this is a theoretical conversation, however to me, it just doesn't make much sense to discount the idea that aliens may have crashed, or were hit by a discharge of electricity (lightning, such as was reported about the Roswell recovery), pilot error, etc. based on the fact that they did crash, and therefore aren't perfect.

All I'm saying is I do believe that it's possible to be a million times more advanced technologically, but still fall short of being absolutely perfect, so I have no problem agreeing to disagree.

At any rate, thanks for keeping things civil - believe it or not I enjoy theoretical conversations about stuff like this, however I realize that philosophically pondering the what-ifs of our earthly experience can be a dangerous road to navigate given all of the disinformation, fakes, grifters, mis-identified sightings, etc. that pervades these topics.

I will readily admit I am not a PhD, or physicist, or scientists, nor do I have a formal education - and I'm certainly not insisting that there is no doubt that aliens are traveling through space to get here - I just think it's an intriguing philosophical exercise to ponder whether it could be true or not...
 
better quality? The entire frame conveniently goes completely unfocused before it turns into ball of light .... lol it's potato quality footage. Then when it "blinks out of sight at faster than the speed of light" the frame goes completely white and stays that way for a full second which implies the light source didn't disappear faster than the speed of light.

Your little space ship drawing doesn't explain how the ship manages to be compromised of no mass which it would need to to travel at the speed of light forget faster. How does it stretch spacetime without having mass? How does stretching spacetime propel something on it's surface? Waves are not made by stretching things.

This documentary attempts to answer the question you're asking, give it a watch when you have time. I timestamped the propulsion segment, but the entire video is worth watching.

 
Yes I’ve heard the sci fi explanation and its nonsense. Maybe you’re new to the thread- but a few days ago I brought up Occam’s razor? Sure it’s not exactly a law of nature, but I find it works pretty well in this scenario.

The reality is that he, and other people who come up with these explanations, have already reached a conclusion that they want. These kinds of explanations are proffered when it runs into the obvious faults in their belief. They’re always filled with plugs to cover the holes in it. So a space ship crashed. The government covered it up with only a few people having seen it. This technology is so advanced that it would be like a jet plane crashing in ancient Egypt and expecting them to reverse engineer it, yet we were able to pull it off. Hell it would likely be even harder than that because it’s unlikely their logical thought processes would be the same.

And now we fly around it in complete government secrecy for reasons but don’t actually use it for anything? We don’t blip over to China and drop a bomb on a CCP meeting and blip back? We don’t travel the universe? We just show it off to a few loons here and there for the last five decades?

I’m about to write something else that annoyingly I’m sure you’re already aware of when you wrote your post, but wrote it anyways. When it comes to these sightings being reported around military sites, you have heard of confirmation bias I assume? I feel like you’re assuming I’m being exposed to most of this stuff for the first time but I don’t know why you would. We’ve all had the internet for and been on here for a while.

I don’t know what ascertations you’re in here defending from him, but itt he has some in and thought he was going to make a fool of everyone and then post a clearly fake video. Then he calls everyone frauds for not accepting his fake evidence as legitimate. In his mind science seems to mean accepting any evidence without scrutiny. And what exactly any of us are guilty of being fraudulent of, I’m not exactly sure since I’ve yet to see anyone in here claim they were a scientist
Like I said I don't defend all of his statements but we have a good relationship and he has a keen awareness of a scientism the new religion and how it infects people's minds. Not sure if you're aware of this but there are scientists saying this too. It's not as if it's just friends UFO people.

You can bring up okams razor if you want, but as we can both readily admit it means nothing because it's not a law but also more importantly we don't have any data to base likelihood on!!! so it's just an appeal to some kind of authority.

But I think probability theory might have something to say about this. I have to ask myself what are the odds that there would be reports of UFOs across centuries, across cultures, across education levels and across demographics often sharing similar stories?... Thousands and thousands and thousands of accounts rolling in? I have to ask myself what I think explains that evidence?

There's just a few options. One is mistaken identity which is easily ruled out when you actually read the accounts and realize it wasn't just a glimpse of something that someone mistook, but that many of the sightings are drawn out, have multiple witnesses and include multiple events... But there could also be hallucinations, but I find that to be ridiculously impossible for lots of reasons but especially when multiple witnesses see the same thing and some of those witnesses are not even in the same group... There's just no way I believe that that many people across centuries, cultures, age groups, and education levels are all hallucinating the same thing... It doesn't make sense. We probably wouldn't survive as a species if that were the case. In any case, I find that highly unlikely, far less plausible than people are actually seeing something that we don't have a grasp on.

So it is absolutely reasonable and level headed to conclude that there's a very strong possibility that there really is a phenomenon happening that we don't have any idea about. There's nothing fringe about that way of thinking if you're taking in all of the data as I am.

What is it that they're seeing? well I can't say for sure... I have a pet theory but I don't claim for it to be the truth. I just keep an open mind about it, but if you take in all of the accounts and all of the evidence, and I have taken in hundreds and hundreds of accounts... that's my sample size.... Probably 500 to 1,000 accounts. The only thing that makes sense is they are actually seeing something there that we don't understand.


And that's what gets people hypothesizing about aliens from other planets interdimensional beings or mythological manifestations as carl jung clearly wrote about with this phenomenon. Personally, I am inclined to believe that we are witnessing the evolution of a global mythological phenomenon in the sense that jung meant it when he wrote of it. Personally, after reading hundreds and hundreds of accounts, that is the hypothesis that makes the most sense to me of the phenomenon, especially when you start realizing it has some similarities with paranormal accounts and even Bigfoot accounts and even accounts that go back centuries.


There are even groups of educated individuals. Some of them with PhDs in the sciences convinced that certain practices (rituals) performed can create an event where a sighting takes place... You find similar accounts from UFO people bigfoot's people and paranormal communities.

Now to me that sounds like the beginnings of pagan religion started over again after having slayed religion from our minds and beginning now anew in new forms.

But we must be clear about carl jungs theory on this... In no way does he believe this emerging mythology is a hallucination or a mass hallucination either. He believes there's a force that interacts with human consciousness that allows for mythological manifestations from our minds to manifest in physical reality. Carl Jung felt that was the best explanation for the phenomenon after actually looking into it deeply and also after having his own encounters with various unexplainable phenomenon.

Although the renowned quantum physicist Wolfgang Smith does not apply his theories of consciousness and quantum physics to the paranormal, he does apply them directly as an explanation for why various religious groups have manifestations of the same principle but with different forms.

All of this though just to say that mocking people who are into this kind of thing and interested is a fool's game. There are better minds than yours thinking deeply about these subjects and that's the kind of conversations I'm interested in having and used to listening to and engaging in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I get what you are saying, in that it seems you are assuming that IF there are more technologically advanced beings traveling through space utilizing advanced vehicles, that they must be free from the constraints of pilot error or mechanical failures, meaning THEY have reached a point of perfection.

To me that just doesn't seem reasonable. You can be a million times more advanced, utilizing propulsion systems that defy all of our understandings of physics, without reaching the point of absolute perfection yet. IF we are being visited, we have no idea what the ration would be of craft that don't crash vs. those that do - and I realize this is a theoretical conversation, however to me, it just doesn't make much sense to discount the idea that aliens may have crashed, or were hit by a discharge of electricity (lightning, such as was reported about the Roswell recovery), pilot error, etc. based on the fact that they did crash, and therefore aren't perfect.

All I'm saying is I do believe that it's possible to be a million times more advanced technologically, but still fall short of being absolutely perfect, so I have no problem agreeing to disagree.

At any rate, thanks for keeping things civil - believe it or not I enjoy theoretical conversations about stuff like this, however I realize that philosophically pondering the what-ifs of our earthly experience can be a dangerous road to navigate given all of the disinformation, fakes, grifters, mis-identified sightings, etc. that pervades these topics.

I will readily admit I am not a PhD, or physicist, or scientists, nor do I have a formal education - and I'm certainly not insisting that there is no doubt that aliens are traveling through space to get here - I just think it's an intriguing philosophical exercise to ponder whether it could be true or not...

If you can travel faster than light you have mastered gravity and mass to a god-like extent you won't be falling out of the sky at any rate remotely close to something like a fucking human designed 737 which crashes at a rate of 0.000414% accident per departure rate.

So take something that crashes 0.000414% of time, make it incomprehensibly better at flying, and what is the likely it's going to crash? .00000000000414%? you know how many alien flights would need to occur before any of this becomes a remote possibility? We need a million times more alien visits then commercial flights a day.
 
Like I said I don't defend all of his statements but we have a good relationship and he has a keen awareness of a scientism the new religion and how it infects people's minds. Not sure if you're aware of this but there are scientists saying this too. It's not as if it's just friends UFO people.

You can bring up okamsrazor if you want, but as we can both readily admit it means nothing because it's not a law but also more importantly we don't have any data to base likelihood on!!! so it's just an appeal to some kind of authority.

But I think probability theory might have something to say about this. I have to ask myself what are the odds that there would be reports of UFOs across centuries, across cultures, across education levels and across demographics often sharing similar stories?... Thousands and thousands and thousands of accounts rolling in? I have to ask myself what I think explains that evidence?

There's just a few options. One is mistaken identity which is easily ruled out when you actually read the accounts and realize it wasn't just a glimpse of something that someone must took, but that many of the sightings are drawn out, have multiple witnesses and include multiple events... But there could also be hallucinations, but I find that to be ridiculously impossible for lots of reasons but especially when multiple witnesses see the same thing and some of those witnesses are not even in the same group... There's just no way I believe that that many people across centuries, cultures, age groups, and education levels are all hallucinating the same thing... It doesn't make sense. We probably wouldn't survive as a species if that were the case. In any case, I find that highly unlikely. Far less plausible than people are actually seeing something that we don't have a grasp on.

So it is absolutely reasonable and level headed to conclude that there's a very strong possibility that there really is a phenomenon happening that we don't have any idea about. There's nothing fringe about that way of thinking if you're taking in all of the data as I am.

What is it that they're seeing? well I can't say for sure... I have a pet theory but I don't claim for it to be the truth. I just keep an open mind about it, but if you take in all of the accounts and all of the evidence, and I have taken in hundreds and hundreds of accounts... that's my sample size.... Probably 500 to 1,000 accounts. The only thing that makes sense is they are actually seeing something there that we don't understand.


And that's what gets people hypothesizing about aliens from other planets interdimensional beings or mythological manifestations as carl jung clearly wrote about with this phenomenon. Personally, I am inclined to believe that we are witnessing the evolution of a global mythological phenomenon in the sense that jung meant it when he wrote of it. Personally, after reading hundreds and hundreds of accounts, that is the hypothesis that makes the most sense to me of the phenomenon, especially when you start realizing it has some similarities with paranormal accounts and even Bigfoot accounts and even accounts that go back centuries.


There are even groups of educated individuals. Some of them with PhDs in the sciences convinced that certain practices (rituals) performed can create an event where a sighting takes place... You find similar accounts from UFO people bigfoot's people and paranormal communities.

Now to me that sounds like the beginnings of pagan religion started over again after having slayed religion from our minds and beginning now anew in new forms.

But we must be clear about carl jungs theory on this... In no way does he believe this emerging mythology is a hallucination or a mass hallucination either. He believes there's a force that interacts with human consciousness that allows for mythological manifestations from our minds to manifest in physical reality. Carl Jung felt that was the best explanation for the phenomenon after actually looking into it deeply and also after having his own encounters with various unexplainable phenomenon.

Although the renowned quantum physicist Wolfgang Smith does not apply his theories of consciousness and quantum physics to the paranormal, he does apply them directly as an explanation for why various religious groups have manifestations of the same principle but with different forms.

All of this though just to say that mocking people who are into this kind of thing and interested is a fool's game. There are better minds than yours thinking deeply about these subjects and that's the kind of conversations I'm interested in having and used to listening to and engaging in.

The Occums Razor answer is that they're being covered up. That's actually the simplest explanation, ironically.

It's like Grover Krantz said, you literally only need one to be real. Just one. Out of a myriad of credible reports that span centuries.
 
This documentary attempts to answer the question you're asking, give it a watch when you have time. I timestamped the propulsion segment, but the entire video is worth watching.



"I don't have the slightest idea what I'm talking about. Here's a youtube video I didn't watch so I haven't pulled any pertinent info from it."
 
"I don't have the slightest idea what I'm talking about. Here's a youtube video I didn't watch so I haven't pulled any pertinent info from it."

Well, that's one way to avoid watching it, and potentially having your question answered.

Such science. Very impressive.
 
No disrespect, but your questions don't make much sense.

Would you agree that cars built in 2024 are significantly more technologically advanced and safer than cars built in 1935? Does the fact that cars built today being more technologically advanced preclude them from being more technologically advanced simply because we still have car accidents today?

You could say the same of aeroplanes and the advancement of the turbine engine. Are they not way more advanced than a single engine prop plane simply because occasionally a modern airliner will crash? What about cell phones? Is an iPhone not significantly more advanced and on a completely different level technology wise than a circa 1950 rotary phone? Does that fact preclude iPhones from occasionally having problems? Of course not, being more advanced does not insinuate that something is perfect.

Just because we can suppose that other civilizations might have way more advanced technology than us, does not mean they are perfect and never make mistakes or have mechanical failures. They are simply more advanced, but not gods.

So yes, it would make perfect logical sense to assume that IF there are non earth beings using incredibly advanced technology to travel through space to get to earth, that occasionally something might go wrong to cause them to crash.
This would be reasonable if we could verify that we've been visited by tens of thousands of spacecraft, the odd one of which here and there has some kind of massive operational failure. But surely if they were that common we'd have all seen them by now, right? It's the bigfoot argument all over again and I see no logic to contradict it in either case, sadly.
 
If you can travel faster than light you have mastered gravity and mass to a god-like extent you won't be falling out of the sky at any rate remotely close to something like a fucking human designed 737 which crashes at a rate of 0.000414% accident per departure rate.

So take something that crashes 0.000414% of time, make it incomprehensibly better at flying, and what is the likely it's going to crash? .00000000000414%? you know how many alien flights would need to occur before any of this becomes a remote possibility? We need a million times more alien visits then commercial flights a day.

We are talking about propulsion systems that are supposedly well beyond what we currently understand of physics, and I think you are anthropomorphizing a little too much in your analogy that current airplanes have a .000414% crash rate, when compared to the number of flights per year that don't crash.

The long and short of it is that I don't personally agree that a technology cannot be supposed to exist unless it is absolutely perfect, ie., it must be made up or fake simply because it has not reached a level of perfection, just by virtue that it is advanced.

Maybe aliens are visiting by the millions - maybe that same advanced technology, or different technology, allows them to mostly go undetected, how do you know that the ratio of crashed vs not crashed is not acceptable for these type of technologies? With propulsion systems and motives that might not be human?

Do you know what the failure rate of a 1950's rotary phone might be? Would you say it's more or less than a 2024 Iphone? Sometimes, as things become more technologically advanced, they inherently add in more variables that are prone to failure. To me, it's certainly possible that physics defying propulsion systems may have more issues than we would otherwise assume - that however does not stop anyone from saying that a modern cell phone is more advanced technologically than a simplistic analog rotary phone, which contains relatively few working parts.

Again, thanks for remaining relatively civil - too often on politics forums everything is framed around arguments and taking sides, and I got sick of that kind of thing a few years ago - I'd much rather participate in a fruitful discussion (at least for me) that gets me pondering different perspectives.
 
Back
Top