Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

[Fedora Millionankles]

Yeah, putting a camera on the moon while they are up there is a stupid idea. What was I thinking.

I don't think we should develop a telescope to be able to view the flag sticking into the moon either. That would be a waste of time.

I think we should request that Nasa put out more cgi and fake stuff instead.

Now you’re just being disingenuous. Not even attempting to answer or acknowledging what I said is proof that your belief system supersedes evidence.
When was the last moon mission? Do you really believe that in 1972 they possessed a camera with the technical capabilities of what you’re asking? They have pictures of Earth from the moon missions and you’ve already dismissed them as fake. You’re bias will not allow for evidence to change your belief system and that is evident.
You want NASA to prove something to you as if you or your uneducated opinion matters; it certainly doesn’t and is not worth all the effort when you’ve hand waved away everything they have provided.

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

Are you talking about air resistance? If so, there are many applications where air resistance is not applicable, such as space travel. The basics of Newtons 3rd law need to be understood at a fundamental level before other variables, like friction, are introduced.

Space travel was the whole debate.
You say there are many applications. Aside from space travel, tell me some more. Seeing as there are "many". And bare in mind I did use the words "earthly example".
Give me some examples where resistance isn't absolutely essential.

*And please, no analogies or theoretical crap. I want observable examples.

 

[Copper Burner]

Now you’re just being disingenuous. Not even attempting to answer or acknowledging what I said is proof that your belief system supersedes evidence.
When was the last moon mission? Do you really believe that in 1972 they possessed a camera with the technical capabilities of what you’re asking? They have pictures of Earth from the moon missions and you’ve already dismissed them as fake. You’re bias will not allow for evidence to change your belief system and that is evident.
You want NASA to prove something to you as if you or your uneducated opinion matters; it certainly doesn’t and is not worth all the effort when you’ve hand waved away everything they have provided.

You shouldn't be proud of appealing to authority.

You think you are too smart to be deceived. You dont even know what it's like to ask questions. I am more thoughtful than you are.

 

[CyberRubberDuck]

Now you’re just being disingenuous. Not even attempting to answer or acknowledging what I said is proof that your belief system supersedes evidence.
When was the last moon mission? Do you really believe that in 1972 they possessed a camera with the technical capabilities of what you’re asking? They have pictures of Earth from the moon missions and you’ve already dismissed them as fake. You’re bias will not allow for evidence to change your belief system and that is evident.
You want NASA to prove something to you as if you or your uneducated opinion matters; it certainly doesn’t and is not worth all the effort when you’ve hand waved away everything they have provided.

Apparently loads of unmanned craft have landed there since. Why can't they plonk a camera up there? I think that's what he was getting at.

 

[dirtypablo]

Is that you diving in to save your dipshit mate who is now being a coward and refusing to reply because he clearly wrote something stupid, got his 'facts' totally wrong and has now resorted to reading and just reacting to posts so he doesn't have to perform a big back peddle?
Incase you didn't notice, that is who the post you are quoting was replying to.
I'll answer you when he addresses what I'm pointing out. You don't get to just redirect away from dipshit I'm afraid.

Are you talking about me? If so, there's no reason to respond to you. You clearly know nothing about physics, but think that you do. Why you're wrong has been explained to you multiple times, but because you're convinced you have an understanding of a subject that you don't understand at all, you refuse to accept the explanation. What point would there be to repeat the same back and forth with you for the 10th time?

 

[James Eagle]

not saying space is fake, but explain to me in detail how something millions of miles away sends info through all of space directly to US. that simple question. HOW?

 

[Copper Burner]

I want to look through a telescope and see the flag on the moon. Is that too much to ask?

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Is that you diving in to save your dipshit mate who is now being a coward and refusing to reply because he clearly wrote something stupid, got his 'facts' totally wrong and has now resorted to reading and just reacting to posts so he doesn't have to perform a big back peddle?
Incase you didn't notice, that is who the post you are quoting was replying to.
I'll answer you when he addresses what I'm pointing out. You don't get to just redirect away from dipshit I'm afraid.

A laser beam is focused by nature. Data has been transmitted by laser 40 times the distance from here to the Moon.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Space travel was the whole debate.
You say there are many applications. Aside from space travel, tell me some more. Seeing as there are "many". And bare in mind I did use the words "earthly example".
Give me some examples where resistance isn't absolutely essential.

*And please, no analogies or theoretical crap. I want observable examples.

Bear*

 

[LangfordBarrow]

You shouldn't be proud of appealing to authority.

You think you are too smart to be deceived. You dont even know what it's like to ask questions. I am more thoughtful than you are.

It's great to ask questions. It's not so great to dismiss the answer if you don't understand it or are unwilling to accept it.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Apparently loads of unmanned craft have landed there since. Why can't they plonk a camera up there? I think that's what he was getting at.

Our explorers do have cameras no matter where in the solar system we send them. Expecting a camera set up to live stream on the Moon the way they have one on your local bridge for traffic updates is an unreasonable ask.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

You shouldn't be proud of appealing to authority.

You think you are too smart to be deceived. You dont even know what it's like to ask questions. I am more thoughtful than you are.

I asked you plenty of questions, as I did at my University. I’ve done experiments to deduce the shape and rotation of earth; hard to deceive someone who has empirical evidence that they procured themselves.
You think you are too smart to be wrong. You don’t even know how to answer questions. I am more intelligent and logical than you are.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

Apparently loads of unmanned craft have landed there since. Why can't they plonk a camera up there? I think that's what he was getting at.

Why exactly would they need to do that? To satisfy the request of some random flerfs that aren’t satisfied by the pictures they’ve already taken, the mass amounts of satellite images already released, and the countless hours of livestream from the ISS and their space walks?
Let’s be honest, flat earth is a religion for uneducated science deniers and no amount evidence will be good enough to sway their faith.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

not saying space is fake, but explain to me in detail how something millions of miles away sends info through all of space directly to US. that simple question. HOW?

How detailed do you mean? You have a craft and a base with transmitters and receivers and they communicate using some part of the electromagnetic spectrum. It's just like a radio. I can't explain every bit of electronics but that's basically how it works. Outer space is mostly vacuum so there's not much in the way to impede a signal.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

I want to look through a telescope and see the flag on the moon. Is that too much to ask?

If you mean that literally then it's going to be a pricey request.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

not saying space is fake, but explain to me in detail how something millions of miles away sends info through all of space directly to US. that simple question. HOW?

Antennas send and receive radio signal that are then received by dishes on Earth.
Hubble telescope utilizes two different types of transmitters to send the data back to Earth: Multiple-Access Transponders (MATs) and S-Band Single-Access Transmitters (SSATs). SSATs transmit real-time science, recorded science, and recorded engineering information at 1 Mbps.

 

[Fedora Millionankles]

I want to look through a telescope and see the flag on the moon. Is that too much to ask?

Yes it is as there would better uses for a telescope of that magnitude than to prove something to some scientifically illiterate Flerf who would just hand wave it away, regardless.

 

[Copper Burner]

It's great to ask questions. It's not so great to dismiss the answer if you don't understand it or are unwilling to accept it.

I don't just accept what's given to me, especially when my basic questions somehow cannot be a answered.

I am not satisfied.

 

[Copper Burner]

I asked you plenty of questions, as I did at my University. I’ve done experiments to deduce the shape and rotation of earth; hard to deceive someone who has empirical evidence that they procured themselves.
You think you are too smart to be wrong. You don’t even know how to answer questions. I am more intelligent and logical than you are.

So you would know the circumference of the earth then right? I would assume you know exactly how far one is able to physically see an object in the distance before the object drops behind the curve right?

 

[Copper Burner]

Yes it is as there would better uses for a telescope of that magnitude than to prove something to some scientifically illiterate Flerf who would just hand wave it away, regardless.

Exactly. Anything that would prove something, clowns like you would dismiss.

I actually think that you are scared. You don't want to find out that you were fooled. It would be a shot to your ego.