• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

Copper Burner said:
You realize Nasa is a "counterpart"of India's space program right?
Click to expand...

And? The Indian space program didn't create it either. I literally linked you to the IRSO website with their gallery of photos from Chandrayaan when I pointed this out to you earlier. Notice that your AI generated image isn't there?

 
Chad R. Thundercock said:
I feel like there should be a law that strips away the right to use modern technology (cell phones, satellite TV/internet, airplanes, etc) from those who promote Flat Earth Theory. I know it's autocratic, but these people need a taste of their own medicine.
Click to expand...
You're much better than me. I think they shouldn't vote and have babies.
 
LangfordBarrow said:
That looks like it could be the right size ratios. Do you have a link to the page?
Click to expand...
earthobservatory.nasa.gov

The Dark Side and the Bright Side - NASA Science

The Deep Space Climate Observatory captured a unique view of the Moon as it passed between the spacecraft and Earth. The Artemis mission will soon take us back for closeups.
earthobservatory.nasa.gov earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Watch the video also and tell me that doesn't look fake as fuck.
 
Fox by the Sea said:
outer space is a hoax?
that's a new one.
Click to expand...
It's so silly. How would we get Jewish space lasers without space?
51UssMk9w7S._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
 
dirtypablo said:
Why would you assume NASA created it?

www.indiatvnews.com

FACT CHECK: Viral pic of Earth from Moon's surface was not taken by Chandrayaan-3 | Know more

A reverse search of the photo led to the same photo being published on other websites, including Facebook and Twitter. Some of the posts claimed that the photo was taken by Chandrayaan-3.
www.indiatvnews.com www.indiatvnews.com
Click to expand...

Because they are part of India's space program and are really good at creating fake images of earth. It probably had to be Nasa approved in order to be released, as Nasa (American taxpayers) have likely pumped billions of dollars into India's space program.

The better question to ask, why can't they just take a real picture from the moon to earth. Why don't they leave a go pro up there and send a live signal back to earth? The answer that the globetards used for that question is that noone would watch it so it's not worth it.

Is any of this suspect to you yet? Or do you just blindly trust authority without question?
 
Last edited:
Copper Burner said:
After all we have learned the last couple of days, this post certainly did not age well haha.

Click to expand...

Oh man people don’t usually self own this hard. Good job there champ. Some advice- stop using social media. It only makes you dumber, and you’re already a pretty dumb guy.
 
AZ103 said:
earthobservatory.nasa.gov

The Dark Side and the Bright Side - NASA Science

The Deep Space Climate Observatory captured a unique view of the Moon as it passed between the spacecraft and Earth. The Artemis mission will soon take us back for closeups.
earthobservatory.nasa.gov earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Watch the video also and tell me that doesn't look fake as fuck.
Click to expand...
I didn't watch the video yet but it looks obviously fake to me. The moon is staggeringly far away from the Earth as are the planets from the sun. If that's an instructional image it might be to illustrate the size comparison of the two.
 
Last edited:
Lord_Impaler said:
Shouldn’t it be fairly simple to get the distance from the moon? I feel like that’s not even a complicated experiment?
Click to expand...
There are 6 retro reflectors that University students bounce laser beams off of every year. They measure the time it takes for the laser beam to return and it’s an experiment I’ve done personally.
 
Copper Burner said:
Because they are part of India's space program and are really good at creating fake images of earth. It probably had to be Nasa approved in order to be released, as Nasa (American taxpayers) have likely pumped billions of dollars into India's space program.

The better question to ask, why can't they just take a real picture from the moon to space? Why don't they leave a go pro up there and send a live signal back to earth? The answer that the globetards used for that question is that noone would watch it so it's not worth it.

Is any of this suspect to you yet? Or do you just blindly trust authority without question?
Click to expand...

So you find a random image on the internet, and just assume it was created by the Indian space research organization, acting on behalf of Nasa. What link is there between the image and NASA or ISRO, other than you thinking that's where it came from?

Hint, there isn't one. It wasn't created by either space agency. It was created by a news organization. I'm not going to address any of your other questions until you acknowledge you're wrong here. You thought that image was generated by NASA, and it wasn't. Admit it.
 
CyberRubberDuck said:
For a start, the blatantly fake images mentioned in the comment I was replying to.
Then there's the moon landing. Funny though, anyone that believes we went to the moon will defend this belief with insults and claims that the non believer is a conspiracy nut.
Then there's the non stop fake astronauts pretending they're on the space station. That's one of the funniest things to see people swallowing.
NASA was literally formed by Nazis. And it has people trusting everything they say. Not sure if it's funny or tragic.
Click to expand...
How can you fake being in the ISS? They have multiple hour long feeds and even some 24 hours long.
I’ve tracked the ISS in the sky as it orbits, verified its speed, and confirmed NASA’s website that lists its location. It’s something anyone can do with a reasonably good telescope.
You don’t need to trust NASA to deduce the shape of the Earth for yourself.
 
dirtypablo said:
Dude, this series started because you said he's a serious scientist and no one has attempted to debunk his work. I provided a link to a group of skeptics providing a critical review of his work, and now you're moving the goalposts to, well, that book isn't a scientific study. No, its not, but if he's a serious scientist he should write it in a way that is in alignment with scientific principals and skepticism. He doesn't need to provide a detailed statistical analysis in a book for the public, but he should still apply basic principals like discussing the likelihood of false memories, preferring the simplest solution to the fanatical etc.

As for his footprint analysis, based on what is in that article, I've got no reason to take anything he does seriously. He sounds like a person who has a conclusion, and uses whatever evidence he has found to back that up, rather than being open to all possibilities.
Click to expand...


I also showed that they lie in that critical review and twist things and leave out evidence intentionally because it's a hack article and it's not a serious criticism at all.

And if you really believe in the scientific method you must go look at meldrum's work now and compare the two which I have done and I can tell you straight up those guys are hacks and liars. They misrepresented his work on purpose.

For the most part I've noticed that the debunkers resort to hack tactics and it's amazing to me how many scientifically-minded people never spot it.

I pointed out several serious problems. I wonder why you're not commenting about those? They debunked his footprint analysis by pretending he doesn't take his own casts... how honest do you think that really is man?


It is still true that there are no serious people debunking his work in any serious way, just hacks lying, omitting evidence and associating him with pseudoscience irresponsibly.

@dirtypablo

one last thing man... he has written at least one actual scientific paper on bigfoot... I wonder why they chose to hold his book for the public to the standard of a scientific paper rather than his actual paper? any guesses? mine will be because his paper holds up so its not an easy target and its better to lie instead.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
CyberRubberDuck said:
That's your only question? Asking me something based around some multi million pound experiment that very very few people can do?
Do you know the level of equipment needed (and who has access to it) for such an experiment with lasers?
That's really your question?
Click to expand...
Bouncing lasers off of the moon is something University students do every year. It costs more than $10 million for all the equipment, so your average Joe isn’t going to be able to replicate it; but at the right University, you can gain access as I did.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,555
Messages
58,375,141
Members
176,016
Latest member
50 caliber beer bottle

Share this page

Back
Top