Rampage explains how outer space is a hoax

Modern day science has no place for metaphysics so we have tons of scientism and myth building going on since the Enlightenment. Not saying space is fake but would be great to see some popular scientists engage with philosophy of science instead of treating it as a religion.
People do it all the time. They just don't try to present it as evidence in a scientifically rigorous inquiry.
 
It's black bears, dude. Sorry. If every other large mammal in North America is threatened with habitat loss because of people except for protected species, why aren't we running into these bastards on the daily for the same reason?
Ok, that's your opinion. I don't know what is responsible for the phenomena personally only that a lot of outdoorsmen who know and understand the back country, along with what black bears look like, beg to differ. Do black bears vocalize? Leave bipedal footprints with no claws? Have lab tested hair follicles that are of some unknown primate? I'm not saying any of that is proof, only that a lot of people and experiences seem to produce as much.
 
Ok, that's your opinion. I don't know what is responsible for the phenomena personally only that a lot of outdoorsmen who know and understand the back country, along with what black bears look like, beg to differ. Do black bears vocalize? Leave bipedal footprints with no claws? Have lab tested hair follicles that are of some unknown primate? I'm not saying any of that is proof, only that a lot of people and experiences seem to produce as much.
You may not have seen my edit, and it may not matter to you, no pressure to respond, but for the sake of the record, please see above.
 
Do you understand what a limited amount of the electromagnetic spectrum your eyes are able to detect. If you have x-ray or gamma ray detectors taking celestial images how do you expect to see them without those frequencies being assigned a color your eyes can detect?
You seem to be struggling with the enormous difference between just taking that photo from that spectrum vs literally Photoshopping moons and shadows around to make it look how you want it to.

You should try reading a history book. I'm sure nothing bad's ever happened that's just been simply erased from official records.
 
I skipped a lot of pages but gravity works by matter stretching the fabric of spacetime all around it. The larger the concentration of mass the more spacetime is stretched.

You can think of empty, or flat, spacetime as being horizontal and having zero speed. With enough of a concentration of mass spacetime can be stretched to it's limit, which you can consider vertical with the maximum speed of causality, which is the speed light travels because it has no mass.

Spacetime can be stretched beyond this point, which is why we observe black holes, but we still don't have any explanation of what's actually going on beyond the event horizon.
 
What does metaphysics have to do with either of these things?

And what in the actual fuck is macro evolution? There's just evolution, ok?
My metaphysics statement was from the previous post. My response was to those two was in reference to philosophy of science.

Is that a question?
 
From you that's a huge compliment :D

What has been exposed here is you can't defend the things you say, you can't provide anything from original sources--only some fucktard on "X" lol, you can't rebut any of my posts with anything resembling a reasoned argument, and you don't understand basic things like comparisons in terms of proportion or basic words like counterpart.

I repeat, "Go ask your rando why lunar eclipses look the way they do. I'll be here waiting for your dumbass."

And FFS finish that GED, you loser.
Do you mean how the moon just disappears into a shadow while during a solar eclipse you can observe the Sun's corona shining around the circumference of the Moon?
 
Because the picture of a warp drive craft you posted is from that nutjobs made up institute. The blog is a detailed breakdown of that guys nonsense. I will say however I can't stop laughing at his book cover, so thank you for that 🤣🤣

That is of no consequence. It was just where I pulled the image from, not why I shared it. He didn't write the paper.

I simply used it as a visual aid, for what I was suspecting he mistook for an edit in the film.
 
I skipped a lot of pages but gravity works by matter stretching the fabric of spacetime all around it. The larger the concentration of mass the more spacetime is stretched.

You can think of empty, or flat, spacetime as being horizontal and having zero speed. With enough of a concentration of mass spacetime can be stretched to it's limit, which you can consider vertical with the maximum speed of causality, which is the speed light travels because it has no mass.

Spacetime can be stretched beyond this point, which is why we observe black holes, but we still don't have any explanation of what's actually going on beyond the event horizon.

That's an interesting theory, however scientists with phd's cannot even explain what causes gravity. Literally noone has the answer.
 
Sup buddy, what's the issue?

I've personally spoken to witnesses of black triangular craft. Anyone who's really researched UFOs knows about em.


What universities are these people associated with? I'm open to the idea of aliens, and even the possibility of advanced technology being possible for them to reach us, but that video was just dopey... {<shrug}

And thanks for the reply and my apologies for the following post I made disparaging you. We're all big dummies to spend so much time in the WR.
 
Ok, that's your opinion. I don't know what is responsible for the phenomena personally only that a lot of outdoorsmen who know and understand the back country, along with what black bears look like, beg to differ. Do black bears vocalize? Leave bipedal footprints with no claws? Have lab tested hair follicles that are of some unknown primate? I'm not saying any of that is proof, only that a lot of people and experiences seem to produce as much.

You have a link to the hair testing? Only stuff I can find are studies where the samples are known mammals or potentially unknown bears, but no unknown primates.
 
That just tells me that you've never really studied the subject in depth, which is fine, as all we have on here are our opinions. That said, I do find it just as hard to believe that 100% all bigfoot history/studies/experiences are fake. Doesn't make them 'bigfoot' in the way we understand the phenomena, but for me at least it makes me curious as to what is actually causing the phenomena, which I will admit could be some type of subjective hallucination or something.

I sincerely believe that 'both sides' must exist to arrive at the truth, that believers and non-believers play equally important roles, but to believe absolutely in an absolute (all reports are American fakes) seems to me at least, to be a unreasonable position made out of a passive handwave of the subject without really exploring it.
For me the most likely explanation for sightings that aren't completely fraudulent is bears. There was a creature called Gigantopithecus in Asia about 300,000 years ago, which is kind of a long time ago considering how long Homo Sapiens have been around, but maybe they lasted longer than believed and these Bigfoot myths are just lore the way Noah's flood could be a real story passed down after some global disaster like a tsunami.
 
It's not a frame skip, go back and look.

alcubierre-warp-drive-overview-small.jpg
How would this work? In theory you can warp spacetime into something like a wave that surfers ride but it requires huge amounts of energy.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top