- Joined
- Dec 14, 2006
- Messages
- 5,132
- Reaction score
- 643
That scene would fit in naked gun. It's that terrible.
Oh, and did you notice Graham McTavish (the dickhead argumentative mercenary) was also the opposing manager in Creed?
Looks like a (deleted) scene that did not make the final cut. It has been a while yet I don’t remember that part of the movie in the theatrical release.That scene would fit in naked gun. It's that terrible.
Looks like a (deleted) scene that did not make the final cut. It has been a while yet I don’t remember that part of the movie in the theatrical release.
I never quite could get past how the storyboard for this one copied a lot from First Blood Part II.
Since you quoted me 3x, ill only reply once because you obviously dont see or dont know what i do. Or, worse, you dumb yourself down to enjoy the flick, which ive done while watching some movies.It's still very good. And there are plenty of real effects blood, so to me it's a very moot point. There was also the bomb CGI scene. It doesn't take away for me the majority of quality warfare enactments. Top notch, some of the best ever captured in cinema IMO.
I dont even know if its a decent one.Terrible acting and digital blood? It was decent for a Rambo movie, but in no way was it a good movie.
Since you quoted me 3x, ill only reply once because you obviously dont see or dont know what i do. Or, worse, you dumb yourself down to enjoy the flick, which ive done while watching some movies.
Once i see cgi, if its obvious like in Rambo, im immediately distracted. 'Oh, thats right, this is make believe.'
I almost applaud anyone that can get entertainment by it. Jealous, i am, but knowledge is a curse.
What movies do i think are better?
First Blood
Rambo 2
Rambo 3
If you're going to mention me, at least "@" me so I see it.Yeah sure, you and TSO are right and everyone else in here are wrong. Good call.
Whatever, maybe you should just watch it again and then watch Rambo, 2 and 3 as well.
I agree that this is an underrated movie. It was great and final action sequence was fantastic.
It's unforunate that Stallone didn't direct The Expendables like this.
I thought he did that all on purpose to poke fun of the genre.It's unfortunate that he didn't direct, write, or act in The Expendables like this.
But of the three, I would say the most sad is the level and effort of writing he offered with The Expendables. Virtually everything about the writing in The Expendables was bad, but the worst of all was the characters. He literally seemed to think the job was entirely done by (a) coming up with a "funny" name, and then (b) one trait for the character (Gunnar Jensen is on drugs, Yin Yang wants money for his famry, Toll Road is sensitive about his cauliflower ears). Boom, done. Moving along to the plot now...
I thought he did that all on purpose to poke fun of the genre.
Look at how desperate he was for a gimmick by the time Antonio Banderas rolled around in the third one and his character had to have "a thing."

This is a subjective opinion of course, but this film just is Sylvester Stallone's greatest work for me. I realize there's another Rambo coming out but I don't know how it can compete or should compete with the Rambo 2008 entry.
First of all, the subject matter of this Rambo entry was interesting, very unique: a group of Christians aid workers go into help a small village in war-torn Burma; the village gets obliterated by a ruthless local infantry unit, the aid workers get captured.
Stallone is at his biggest, most-jacked, self. But he actually pulls it off, better than his character in the later - much weaker - franchise, The Expendables. He is an absolutely believable Vietnam War veteran killing machine. His line, "When you're pushed, killing is as easy as breathing" resonates so believably. He even understands himself, who he is: that he's a killing machine, remembering bits and pieces from his past and those who created him for the Vietnam War. His story and character are so well crafted.
And then there's the war violence. IMO, the violence is most brutal and realistic of any mainstream cinematic offering. Yes, more than even Saving Private Ryan. I read one review awhile ago that called it a gore film. But yeah, the village destruction, the killing fields, and then the lengthy last battle scene? Extremely brutal, raw, and intense. It blows you through the back of your seat. And the action is quick-moving, articulate, creative and believable.
If you haven't seen this film, it's a must-see. It still holds up very well 11 years later. Stallone doesn't get nearly enough credit for this film nor his character portrayal. I don't throw out the term masterpiece very often, but this film is in that stratosphere for what it is.
Lol and rightfully, holy fucking shit.I agree that this is an underrated movie. It was great and final action sequence was fantastic.
It's unforunate that Stallone didn't direct The Expendables like this.
It's phenomenal, especially for the gore & violence.