Do you really think the poor only live in cities?
Maybe you need to get out and see the US.
Or that’s what I expect of you that you dismiss any rural area as worthless and only fly over who should not count for votes or have any say in the country.
Or that's a ridiculous reply to a valid criticism of a ridiculous post. About the first sentence, I made no such assumption, while your post, the one I was replying to, made a ridiculous assumption, that "everyone" will need a new car.
About your second line, I won't step foot in your insane country (until some laws change).
About your third line, I'm not dismissing rural anything while you're making dumb illogical assumptions. No matter what kind of vehicles people are driving, the energy demands will be unsustainable if they continue to increase. To reduce energy use, getting as many people as possible onto public transport will be a key element. Obviously things are different in lower population areas. But you made it sound like a much larger issue by saying "everyone." You already subsidize rural people left and right, so programs to help them be more green, including reduced EV prices, don't seem out of the realm of possibility to me. There are lots of options for people of varying kinds of accessibility issues, unlike trying to, say, figure out how "everyone" is going to get a new car.
Try to expand your thinking a little. You don't strike me like a bad person, but a lot of the time you come across like Clint Eastwood talking to the chair.
