Social Queer Planet: NBC film that looks at LGBTQ animals

Many things were predicated in this thread.

I wish we could have PREDICTED that.
 
You are stating an opinion by assuming only sexual behavior that causes offspring is beneficial in intelligent social species and for some reason you haven’t explained no other sexual behavior can also beneficial. You have drawn some weird personal line in the moral sand where nature doesn’t.

You are literally trying to explain this common behavior to what is akin to a majority of humans being born blind. A ridiculous fairy tale scenario you made up because you’re so desperate to spin this as a defect. It makes no sense in reality which is why you can’t even show where it’s ever been the case. It seems like you lack some science literacy to come up with this argument.

We get it, you hate gay stuff passionately. We don’t have to get into why or someone might bitch I need to get carded but you do. Animals don’t give a fuck about your feelings. You having emotions about something doesn’t make it a defect. There’s a reason you have posted all your theories without any research backing them up.

I don't hate gay anyone can live the life they want as long as they respect the rights of others.

I know a couple of guy people and I treat them with respect and they do the same.

That doesn't change the facts.
 
I don't hate gay anyone can live the life they want as long as they respect the rights of others.

I know a couple of guy people and I treat them with respect and they do the same.

That doesn't change the facts.

For the sixth time.

You are stating an opinion, not fact, by assuming only sexual behavior that causes offspring is beneficial in intelligent social species and for some reason you haven’t explained no other sexual behavior can also beneficial. You have drawn some weird personal line in the moral sand where nature doesn’t.

You’re not arguing against this. Because you can’t. You just keep repeating that it’s a fact hoping that it’ll make it one. That’s not how facts work.
 
For the sixth time.

You are stating an opinion, not fact, by assuming only sexual behavior that causes offspring is beneficial in intelligent social species and for some reason you haven’t explained no other sexual behavior can also beneficial. You have drawn some weird personal line in the moral sand where nature doesn’t.

You’re not arguing against this. Because you can’t. You just keep repeating that it’s a fact hoping that it’ll make it one. That’s not how facts work.

What intelligence species can reproduce with male on male or female on female.

You refuse to to admit you are wrong on that.

Also you refuse to admit if "gay" disappeared tomorrow the most intelligence species would be just fine.

The facts just hurt you feelings.
 
What intelligence species can reproduce with male on male or female on female.

You refuse to to admit you are wrong on that.

Also you refuse to admit if "gay" disappeared tomorrow the most intelligence species would be just fine.

The facts just hurt you feelings.

None. But that doesn’t make gay behavior a negative trait. There are species where a majority of the females sexual behavior is with other females. They still reproduce with males. Both sexual behaviors seem to benefit their social species according to the scientist whom observe it. That’s why you can’t find studies highlighting the defect of homosexual behaviors ins my species.

The family down the block are lesbians. They have 3 kids. My family has 2 and are straight.

You don’t have an argument here to as far gay behavior limiting populations in nature or in our society. If it was, the species presenting it the most like the intelligent social ones we have been discussing would be long dead. Yet they thrive.

If this trait was some defect, it wouldn’t present itself most commonly in the most intelligent species
 
None. But that doesn’t make gay behavior a negative trait. There are species where a majority of the females sexual behavior is with other females. They still reproduce with males. Both sexual behaviors seem to benefit their social species according to the scientist whom observe it. That’s why you can’t find studies highlighting the defect of homosexual behaviors ins my species.

The family down the block are lesbians. They have 3 kids. My family has 2 and are straight.

You don’t have an argument here to as far gay behavior limiting populations in nature or in our society. If it was, the species presenting it the most like the intelligent social ones we have been discussing would be long dead. Yet they thrive.

If this trait was some defect, it wouldn’t present itself most commonly in the most intelligent species

All kinds of defects present themselves and the species is able to limit the impact of the abnormality .

If it was not an abnormality then all the species would be share the common trate. Homosexually is an abnormality. That doesn't affect how the species learns to accept or treat that abnormality.
 
8rt8fi.jpg
 
All kinds of defects present themselves and the species is able to limit the impact of the abnormality .

If it was not an abnormality then all the species would be share the common trate. Homosexually is an abnormality. That doesn't affect how the species learns to accept or treat that abnormality.

You compared the behavior to blindness, name a species where all the females are blind. You can’t because you are spitting complete gibberish here pretending like it’s some science theory.

If the behavior was some defect it wouldn’t be some present. You can’t answer a single question I pose directly because you lack some science literacy.

Why don’t you stop relying on your feelings and his read the studies? You have a very strange emotional stake in the morality of these animals sex lives
 
You compared the behavior to blindness, name a species where all the females are blind. You can’t because you are spitting complete gibberish here pretending like it’s some science theory.

If the behavior was some defect it wouldn’t be some present. You can’t answer a single question I pose directly because you lack some science literacy.

Why don’t you stop relying on your feelings and his read the studies? You have a very strange emotional stake in the morality of these animals sex lives

Name a species where all the females are homosexual. Which is why it's an abnormality along with homosexually.

I'm not relying on my feelings just biological facts which has nothing to do with feelings.

I don't care about their sex life's. I just understand biology.

You seem to think your feelings over ride biology.
 
Name a species where all the females are homosexual. Which is why it's an abnormality along with homosexually.

I'm not relying on my feelings just biological facts which has nothing to do with feelings.

I don't care about their sex life's. I just understand biology.

You seem to think your feelings over ride biology.

So you couldn’t find a single species that ever actually experienced anything like you described and out of embarrassment you have ducked the question by asking a question? Lol copy that. 10th concession noted.


I did. It was like the 1st post I made. Bonobos. You dummies ask for evidence but don’t have the attention span or literacy to read it.

How does half the species exhibit a trait it’s a defect?
 
So you couldn’t find a single species that ever actually experienced anything like you described and out of embarrassment you have ducked the question by asking a question? Lol copy that. 10th concession noted.


I did. It was like the 1st post I made. Bonobos. You dummies ask for evidence but don’t have the attention span or literacy to read it.

You can try and deny biology all you want but that doesn't change the facts.

You keep spaz posting but biology is biology and truth is truth.
 
You can try and deny biology all you want but that doesn't change the facts.

You keep spaz posting but biology is biology and truth is truth.
Cope post. Asked for info, got it, got triggered by it, couldn’t find any sources for your own bullshit, so you responded with emotion.


Exactly like I predicted you would behave from the jump. You my sons at this point lol
 
Cope post. Asked for info, got it, got triggered by it, couldn’t find any sources for your own bullshit, so you responded with emotion.


Exactly like I predicted you would behave from the jump. You my sons at this point lol

Bullshit
Show intelligent species intelligence as in primates where two males or females cabn reproduce.

You can say or post bullshit all you want but that doesn't change biology.

You should like a hurt child when confronted with facts you don't like.
 
Bullshit
Show intelligent species intelligence as in primates where two males or females cabn reproduce.

You can say or post bullshit all you want but that doesn't change biology.

You should like a hurt child when confronted with facts you don't like.

I don’t need to show that because as nature has shown, not all sexual behavior in intelligent species needs to be aimed at reproduction to pose benefits. I keep asking you to prove that and you choke and just repeat yourself.

That’s something the church made up you are projecting on nature. Nature doesn’t care about your sensibilities and feels.
 
300 posts of leftists modelling human behavior off of shit eating, rapey cannibal animals

0729a664-be26-4c83-b7b1-57b5fecb5f91_text.gif
 
Posts “I’m not even bothering to read your posts” 2x then goes and makes an art project about me.

You’re turning this thread into an episode of baby reindeer with the way you obsess over me.
Why are you always quoting or tagging me?

#obsessed
 
300 posts of leftists modelling human behavior off of shit eating, rapey cannibal animals

0729a664-be26-4c83-b7b1-57b5fecb5f91_text.gif

you’re throwing a bitch fit about 300 posts of something yet you can’t quote a single post of it happening?

You guys are much better at bitching than reading lol.
 
Back
Top