- Joined
- Nov 22, 2016
- Messages
- 9,205
- Reaction score
- 13,031
The picture of the burned feet is fake.
It's from this:
Gahh worked by fake immolation...
AGAIN!
The picture of the burned feet is fake.
It's from this:
I'll poison you in your sleep you little cunt."My legacy is Poison. Everything about me is Poison. I'm the Poison guy." -- GoldenAzazel
I'll poison you in your sleep you little cunt.
/s
I'm pretty sure that Tweet is a joke.
How did Kaepernick do that?
I know that one is a joke. But, I've seen people who have legitimately burned/shredded/generally destroyed all Nike items because of the Kaepernick endorsement.
I think Kaepernick's "activism" rings hollow because it's clear that he didn't stand for the anthem the first time because he was pouting over getting benched, because he was a mediocre quarterback. Then he opts out of his contract with the 49ers, and no team wanted him because he's an expensive, but mediocre, quarterback. But, Nike have decided to give him an endorsement deal that apparently ranks up their with upper echelon NFL players.
Just something about that doesn't sit right with me. It's like Pepsi's campaign last year, especially when the advert says "Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything!" It's a cash in.
I know that one is a joke. But, I've seen people who have legitimately burned/shredded/generally destroyed all Nike items because of the Kaepernick endorsement.
I think Kaepernick's "activism" rings hollow because it's clear that he didn't stand for the anthem the first time because he was pouting over getting benched, because he was a mediocre quarterback. Then he opts out of his contract with the 49ers, and no team wanted him because he's an expensive, but mediocre, quarterback. But, Nike have decided to give him an endorsement deal that apparently ranks up their with upper echelon NFL players.
Just something about that doesn't sit right with me. It's like Pepsi's campaign last year, especially when the advert says "Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything!" It's a cash in.
Dummies are acting like he's getting a signature shoe....he's not.I know that one is a joke. But, I've seen people who have legitimately burned/shredded/generally destroyed all Nike items because of the Kaepernick endorsement.
I think Kaepernick's "activism" rings hollow because it's clear that he didn't stand for the anthem the first time because he was pouting over getting benched, because he was a mediocre quarterback. Then he opts out of his contract with the 49ers, and no team wanted him because he's an expensive, but mediocre, quarterback. But, Nike have decided to give him an endorsement deal that apparently ranks up their with upper echelon NFL players.
Just something about that doesn't sit right with me. It's like Pepsi's campaign last year, especially when the advert says "Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything!" It's a cash in.
He'd do as good as Manziel in the CFL tbh.How is it "clear" that he didn't stand the first time because he was mad about getting benched? And how does one of his sponsors not bailing on him make his activism "hollow?" He's lost millions of dollars that he would have made in the NFL but for his protests. And you're deluding yourself if you think someone wouldn't have signed him but for the controversy.
lol AlouettesHe'd do as good as Manziel in the CFL tbh.
This John Rich guy is part of team Red. Of course people from team Blue aren't going to like him.
<puh-lease75>
I don't know. But he @'d Tomi Lahren, so he's on team Red.Who is he? He kind of seems like a jabroni mark without a life that don't know it's a work when he worked a work and worked himself into a shoot. Mark.
How is it "clear" that he didn't stand the first time because he was mad about getting benched? And how does one of his sponsors not bailing on him make his activism "hollow?" He's lost millions of dollars that he would have made in the NFL but for his protests. And you're deluding yourself if you think someone wouldn't have signed him but for the controversy.