- Joined
- Apr 21, 2007
- Messages
- 24,300
- Reaction score
- 7,012
I'm a mark for flippy shit. Scott was probably a top 5 guy in his prime, if not higher. Too bad he got injured because he could have been one of the greatest of all time.The Steiners vibe I get off them related to the fact they are both good athletes, brothers and they had a lot of ultra dangerous looking offence that looks like it was killing people. That being said they are probably not all that similar in other aspects.
I don't think I could concur with Slick about them being better by a country mile though.
89-92 Steiners were absolutely brilliant, easily a top 2 or 3 tag team in the world when tag wrestling actually meant something and there were loads of great teams about.