Elections Project 2025 major right wing groups plan on creating a new super super pack

What is funny is the same people that say “The WEF has no power and can’t really do what they say they want to do” think that this is real.

What in the actual he'll has the WEF done wrong? They're a think tank conjured by billionaires who are completely disconnected from regular people but at least they're pro humanist. They offer humane policies for dealing with major issues which need to be addressed. I don't even dislike right wing policies and tend to land on being an internal Libertarian but i don't know why the working class would so over value the very people who had exploited then during the industrial revolution by supporting regulations that undermine the values people like them generated from those experiences. Every single one of these policies is anti human rights and pro industry that enacting them all would essentially reset the planet to a smog ridden industrial hell hole rendering human rights meaningless.
 
What in the actual he'll has the WEF done wrong? They're a think tank conjured by billionaires who are completely disconnected from regular people but at least they're pro humanist. They offer humane policies for dealing with major issues which need to be addressed. I don't even dislike right wing policies and tend to land on being an internal Libertarian but i don't know why the working class would so over value the very people who had exploited then during the industrial revolution by supporting regulations that undermine the values people like them generated from those experiences. Every single one of these policies is anti human rights and pro industry that enacting them all would essentially reset the planet to a smog ridden industrial hell hole rendering human rights meaningless.
Exhibit A
 
What is funny is the same people that say “The WEF has no power and can’t really do what they say they want to do” think that this is real.
LOL. you think the WEF has more power than the Heritage Foundation, TPUSA, the Conservative Partnership Institute, etc.? Do you think it's a conspiracy theory that the GOP exists?
 
LOL. you think the WEF has more power than the Heritage Foundation, TPUSA, the Conservative Partnership Institute, etc.? Do you think it's a conspiracy theory that the GOP exists?
In fairness, WEF is a discussion forum where a lot of high level people come. i doubt Xi Jinping would ever come to a Heritage Foundation event. But he did come to Davos. It's also a very european type event. american wef-like groups tend to be very sinister, wef is like a incubator for a lot of the wacky ideas (you will eat ze bugs), so wacky they're upstream of meme formation. there's mindfulness and yoga events on the sidelines ffs.
 

what conspiracy? these people have already laid out their plans on their own website. of course you'll go along with it it too because you've already formed a human centipede with that fraudy orange election-losing rapist and you've attached yourself right behind him.

if you want to talk conspiracies, hows that stolen election thingy of yours going lately? it's been 1168 days now, have they found any of that evidence of fraud and brought it to court yet? no, but any day now, just not today right? but let me guess, it's still real to you right, or do you just want it to be because you don't know how else to cope with your rapey orange messiah getting pink socked in the election by some senile old man with dementia?

I agree with except the last part Biden is focused on the Putin, Kim Jong an Iranian mob family run efforts to destabilize his Presidency. Ukraine is Putin's deal creating problems an in Arab areas is Iran an Wagner backed issues around Yemen. I would not be surprised if Saudis are funding pat of this efforts.
 
What do you people actually think 5 minute cities and the bug eating policies are. I know what they think they are but those weird ass CTs aren't grounded in reality in any way whatsoever.
 
In fairness, WEF is a discussion forum where a lot of high level people come. i doubt Xi Jinping would ever come to a Heritage Foundation event. But he did come to Davos. It's also a very european type event. american wef-like groups tend to be very sinister, wef is like a incubator for a lot of the wacky ideas (you will eat ze bugs), so wacky they're upstream of meme formation. there's mindfulness and yoga events on the sidelines ffs.
Sure, but that's just it. Conference where people talk about shit. The Heritage Foundation basically sets the agenda for one of our two major political parties. And their wacky ideas aren't laughed at because we know that they could actually happen. Like, bringing back the patronage system (part of what this thread is about) is insane. We got rid of that because of the corruption, authoritarianism, and instability it brought.
 
"A network of public interest groups and lawmakers, nervous about former President Trump’s potential return to power, is quietly devising plans"

Sounds familiar. Hmmmmmmm..

Just like that Time magazine article where they blatantly talked about "fortifying" the election, lol


trump lost. fortify your feelings.
 
Not that I believe them at all, but it's worth noting that Trump's campaign is (kinda, sorta) distancing themselves from Project 2025 presently. Or perhaps "downplaying" would be a better word to use:


In a statement, Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles distanced the campaign from Project 2025’s plans for a second administration, saying no policies are official unless they’re directly announced by the campaign.
 
“Project 2025 is a far-right manifesto and blueprint for Trump and Republicans to enact widespread, wholesale policy violence on everyone who calls America home,” said Rep. Pressley. “We must call that out and use every Congressional tool to push back and prevent this harmful agenda from becoming reality. I’m proud to join my colleagues on this critical task force to save our democracy and do just that.”

Project 2025 has four pillars: a policy agenda, a Presidential Personnel Database, a Presidential Administration Academy, and a (yet to be released) playbook for the first 180 days of the next Administration. For the purposes of this blogpost, I will focus on the policy agenda.
 
In the foreword of Project 2025's Mandate, Kevin Roberts argues that pornography amounts to promoting sexual deviancy, the sexualization of children, and the exploitation of women. For Roberts, it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and as such should be banned. He recommends the criminal prosecution of individuals and companies producing pornography, which he compares to addictive drugs.[21] Previously, the Supreme Court has ruled against attempts to ban pornography on the grounds that it was protected by the First Amendment.[99]

When he was nominated as the official presidential candidate for the Republican Party in 2016, Donald Trump signed a pledge to examine the "public health impact of Internet pornography on youth, families and the American culture." However, he did not fulfill this promise. But despite former President Trump's connection to adult-film star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal, Roberts is unencumbered. "We understand our lord works with imperfect instruments, including us. While on the surface it seems like a contradiction, on the whole, it may make him a more powerful messenger if he embraces it," he explained to CNN.[99]
 
In the foreword of Project 2025's Mandate, Kevin Roberts argues that pornography amounts to promoting sexual deviancy, the sexualization of children, and the exploitation of women. For Roberts, it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and as such should be banned. He recommends the criminal prosecution of individuals and companies producing pornography, which he compares to addictive drugs.[21] Previously, the Supreme Court has ruled against attempts to ban pornography on the grounds that it was protected by the First Amendment.[99]

When he was nominated as the official presidential candidate for the Republican Party in 2016, Donald Trump signed a pledge to examine the "public health impact of Internet pornography on youth, families and the American culture." However, he did not fulfill this promise. But despite former President Trump's connection to adult-film star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal, Roberts is unencumbered. "We understand our lord works with imperfect instruments, including us. While on the surface it seems like a contradiction, on the whole, it may make him a more powerful messenger if he embraces it," he explained to CNN.[99]
The whole pornograpy angle is a red herring....the real meat of it is probably tax cuts , de regulation, and fossil fuels. We should really be fighting against the big oil albatross around our necks.
 
What in the actual he'll has the WEF done wrong? They're a think tank conjured by billionaires who are completely disconnected from regular people but at least they're pro humanist. They offer humane policies for dealing with major issues which need to be addressed. I don't even dislike right wing policies and tend to land on being an internal Libertarian but i don't know why the working class would so over value the very people who had exploited then during the industrial revolution by supporting regulations that undermine the values people like them generated from those experiences. Every single one of these policies is anti human rights and pro industry that enacting them all would essentially reset the planet to a smog ridden industrial hell hole rendering human rights meaningless.

Most people are too lazy to look at things at a deeper level and instead take the aristocracy's platitudes at face value. The platitudes' purpose is always to thinly veil the real subject of discussion, because they know the vast majority of people are too lazy to watch. For example the WEF had an entire discussion panel on the issue of fixing "unbanked and underbanked" people & "financial inclusivity" in the context of CBDCs. A fool looks at this headline and thinks "Oh wow, how amazing that they're worried about people not having bank accounts!" Meanwhile the real meta discussion that they're having is the worry that some people who don't have bank accounts and don't want them will avoid the CBDC system they have in the wings, and brainstorming ways to coerce them into the system. This is obvious a few minutes into it, a few minutes a person like you is too lazy to invest.
 
Not that I believe them at all, but it's worth noting that Trump's campaign is (kinda, sorta) distancing themselves from Project 2025 presently. Or perhaps "downplaying" would be a better word to use:


In a statement, Chris LaCivita and Susie Wiles distanced the campaign from Project 2025’s plans for a second administration, saying no policies are official unless they’re directly announced by the campaign.

You don't overtly admit you're going to install fascism, you just do it when you have the chance.

This sh*t is mostly talked about openly on religious televeision networks, because the Cristofascists know no secular people are watching.
 
The whole pornograpy angle is a red herring....the real meat of it is probably tax cuts , de regulation, and fossil fuels. We should really be fighting against the big oil albatross around our necks.

IMO the meat of it is eradication of constitutional protections and dismantling of the administrative State. That goes beyond tax cuts. That's essentially moving towards making this a slave Nation again. Also the use of the Federasl system to force compliance at the State level. That's insanity, and hugely unconstitutional.
 
Back
Top