Elections Project 2025 major right wing groups plan on creating a new super super pack

BTW, I was looking into religious lunacy behind Project 2025 and came across some sh*t Kenneth Copeland did recently. Maybe today's Christian fanatics are just built different, but the Southern Baptists I grew up around would have definitely said this sh*t is Satanic:

 
.
Imagine saying that, as the Dems are portraying their opponent as the "end of democracy, and American life itself!".

ROFL!

You guys really lack any sort of introspection, don't you?

The Heritage Foundation: "We are literally going to end democacy."

Donald Trump: "Suspend the constitution, dictator on day 1. Prosecute Democrats and any media mean to me."

US Representative Lauren Bobo: "The Church should be telling the State what to do."

Two US State Governors: "Your children are now required by law to learn Christian principals."

The US Supreme Court: "It actually ISN'T illegal if the President does it, so long as that President is Donald Trump."

US Representative Margerine Green on removing Democrats: "A bullet to the head would be quicker."

Sherfront d*ckhead HereticBD: "Can you believe any leftists believe these people actually mean the things they both say and do!?!?!? What morons!!"
 
Last edited:
How to tell Trump's lying is his lips moving?

1000008851-jpg.1051426
 
Look at this little bitch. Acting like he doesn't know what it is. This is how you know that he knows it's unpopular. If it were popular, Convicted Felon Trump would be taking all the credit for it. Too late, scared little bitch.



If this utter craven coward gets voted in, working class Republicans who buy into his bullsh*t deserve all the misery that's going to happen to them that they think is gonna only happen to Democrats. Project 2025 has framers who WORKED IN HIS ADMINISTRATION.

What a lying sack of sh*t, who doesnt even have the balls to say what he is absolutely going to do like a man. In the immortal words of Principal Vernon:

"That's what I thought, you're a gutless turd."
 
The Heritage Foundation: "We are literally going to end democacy."

Donald Trump: "Suspend the constitution, dictator on day 1. Prosecute Democrats and any media mean to me."

US Representative Lauren Bobo: "The Church should be telling the State what to do."

Two US State Governors: "Your children are now required by law to learn Christian principals."

The US Supreme Court: "It actually ISN'T illegal if the President does it, so long as that President is Donald Trump."

US Representative Margerine Green on removing Democrats: "A bullet to the head would be quicker."

Sherfront d*ckhead HereticBD: "Can you believe any leftists believe these people actually mean the things they both say and do!?!?!? What morons!!"
Democrats: "Elect us or democracy is dead and the world as you know it will end!"

Look, I'm sorry that you stepped into shit with your silly idiotic talking point, and refuse to see that the Dems are doing the exact thing you said desperate power hungry folks do, but it is what it is.

Oh' and BTW, the Supreme Court ruling applies to Biden as well. Your entire logic on that one is ridiculous, considering Trump isn't even the President, you absolute clown.
 
Look at this little bitch. Acting like he doesn't know what it is. This is how you know that he knows it's unpopular. If it were popular, Convicted Felon Trump would be taking all the credit for it. Too late, scared little bitch.


What gibberish. He claims he disagrees with some of the things he knows about them right after he claims he knows nothing about them, immediately contradicting himself.
 
Look at this little bitch. Acting like he doesn't know what it is. This is how you know that he knows it's unpopular. If it were popular, Convicted Felon Trump would be taking all the credit for it. Too late, scared little bitch.


So, he comes out and condemns it, and you all still have the same reaction you would have if he came out openly supporting it. It's almost as if the new fear-mongering term of the week "pRoJeCt 2025" should be completely ignored.
 
So, he comes out and condemns it, and you all still have the same reaction you would have if he came out openly supporting it. It's almost as if the new fear-mongering term of the week "pRoJeCt 2025" should be completely ignored.
You think he's condemning it? Lol. He's lying and saying he has nothing to do with it because he knows he can lose on it. The architect of it came out and gave him all the credit for it. The drafters all worked for him. And he said he knew nothing about it? The fact that you twisted his statement into condemnation tells us everything we need to know about you. C'mon, you have to be smarter than that. Then again, nevermind...
 
So, he comes out and condemns it, and you all still have the same reaction you would have if he came out openly supporting it. It's almost as if the new fear-mongering term of the week "pRoJeCt 2025" should be completely ignored.

You're defending the guy who claimed not to have any idea who David Duke was AFTER receiving his endorsement for President, having criticized the Republican Party BECAUSE they allowed David Duke among them live on National Television.

You apologists/supporters are every bit as predictable as your desired Pathological Liar in Chief is. Did you think that we would think he would defend Project 2025? Do you think that we thought he was a "Strong Man?" He is a weak sniveling coward who would melt into goo if he didnt get enough attention in a day, and if anyone dared to tell him "no." He is built like around 260lbs of chewed bubble gum, with a bad hair piece, a diaper, titties, and 6 cans of spray tan.

We are not deriding him for revealing that he is something we didnt think he is...we are chastising him for being EXACTLY what we think he is. He doesnt have the courage to tell you to your face that he's going to make the US worse, and turn it into an oligarchy. He isn't going to say that he knows what everyone around him has been talking about, because its currently proving to be a political landmine, and he knows people like you will handwave it because that's what you want to do.
 
So, he comes out and condemns it, and you all still have the same reaction you would have if he came out openly supporting it. It's almost as if the new fear-mongering term of the week "pRoJeCt 2025" should be completely ignored.
I'm seeing Republicans kind of going back and forth between "it's actually good" and "of course Trump would never support something so horrible." I'd love to see a kind of show of hands of which it is. My guess is that it's like the Roe reversal or Trump's big giveaway to the rich--something that will be disavowed until it happens, at which point it'll be defended/ignored by the media and his fans.

I also note that no Republicans who think it's obviously bad and wouldn't be implemented argue with other Republicans who think it's good.
 
You think he's condemning it? Lol. He's lying and saying he has nothing to do with it because he knows he can lose on it. The architect of it came out and gave him all the credit for it. The drafters all worked for him. And he said he knew nothing about it? The fact that you twisted his statement into condemnation tells us everything we need to know about you. C'mon, you have to be smarter than that. Then again, nevermind...
Interesting, considering you use a doctored version of Trump's tweet that "Biden-Harris HQ" put out on Twitter. But, your hypocrisy aside, you don't want to acknowledge him saying "I disagree with some of the things they are saying and some of the things they're saying is absolutely abysmal and ridiculous." You're clearly only going to believe what you are told to believe so there's not much stock I can put in anything you pretend to be upset about.
 
Trump generally doesn't know or care about policy except to the extent that it personally benefits him, but the Heritage Foundation does, and Trump is happy to let them do the actual work of coming up with stuff, while he campaigns on whatever he thinks he has to say to win. But the idea of turning the gov't into a protection racket is obviously very appealing to him (and it's something he tried without a lot of success last time).
 
I'm seeing Republicans kind of going back and forth between "it's actually good" and "of course Trump would never support something so horrible." I'd love to see a kind of show of hands of which it is. My guess is that it's like the Roe reversal or Trump's big giveaway to the rich--something that will be disavowed until it happens, at which point it'll be defended/ignored by the media and his fans.

I also note that no Republicans who think it's obviously bad and wouldn't be implemented argue with other Republicans who think it's good.
I've really only heard the emphasis on Project 2025 recently. I'm not factoring some think tank's "project" into my decision and I don't know anybody else who is. I haven't even read the whole thing top to bottom because I don't care. I'll give it a proper read, as it seems to become a hot topic.


You're defending the guy who claimed not to have any idea who David Duke was AFTER receiving his endorsement for President, having criticized the Republican Party BECAUSE they allowed David Duke among them live on National Television.

You apologists/supporters are every bit as predictable as your desired Pathological Liar in Chief is. Did you think that we would think he would defend Project 2025? Do you think that we thought he was a "Strong Man?" He is a weak sniveling coward who would melt into goo if he didnt get enough attention in a day, and if anyone dared to tell him "no." He is built like around 260lbs of chewed bubble gum, with a bad hair piece, a diaper, titties, and 6 cans of spray tan.

We are not deriding him for revealing that he is something we didnt think he is...we are chastising him for being EXACTLY what we think he is. He doesnt have the courage to tell you to your face that he's going to make the US worse, and turn it into an oligarchy. He isn't going to say that he knows what everyone around him has been talking about, because its currently proving to be a political landmine, and he knows people like you will handwave it because that's what you want to do.
When the fuck did you go off the rails, dude? Seriously, you were one of the best posters on this site and I used to eat up all the stuff you'd post about boxing technique and the kids you were training. That shit was Sherdog at it's best, IMO. You want me to respond to this TDS ridden trash, talking about diapers and titties? The fuck happened to you?
 
Interesting, considering you use a doctored version of Trump's tweet that "Biden-Harris HQ" put out on Twitter. But, your hypocrisy aside, you don't want to acknowledge him saying "I disagree with some of the things they are saying and some of the things they're saying is absolutely abysmal and ridiculous." You're clearly only going to believe what you are told to believe so there's not much stock I can put in anything you pretend to be upset about.
I won't acknowledge it because he's lying through his teeth. Why would I? Lol. Jesus man, you're in deep. The dipshit lies every chance he gets, of course he's lying now. Everyone who's not a MAGAt can see he's lying. The fact that you're denying it and doubling down and then calling me a hypocrite is fucking hilarious. And I'm not upset, he's backtracking because he knows it's bad for his campaign, it's funny as hell. The fact that you refuse to see or admit it is even funnier.
 
I've really only heard the emphasis on Project 2025 recently. I'm not factoring some think tank's "project" into my decision and I don't know anybody else who is. I haven't even read the whole thing top to bottom because I don't care. I'll give it a proper read, as it seems to become a hot topic.
In May, Trump's former OMB director Russ Vought, who played a key role in drafting it, was named the RNC Platform Committee's policy director a couple of months ago. Johnny McEntee, who was Trump's Director of White House Presidential Personnel (and considered the chief loyalty enforcer) is also part of the project. Stephen Miller heads the legal group on the project's advisory board. The Heritage Foundation generally has long set the agenda for elected Republicans. I think you're making a mistake thinking of this as "some thing tank's project." It's the intellectual organ of the GOP working closely with Trump's team to come up with stuff. And, again, Trump himself doesn't even follow that stuff closely and has deferred to the policy team, as long as what they do personally benefits him.

And if Trump is really so out of touch that he doesn't know what his top advisors are doing, how can we expect him to resist it? And why doesn't he go on record saying he's not doing that stuff?
 
Back
Top