The spirit of the constitution for me applies to all businesses..public or private..The lines between the two are blurred everyday..now more than ever..
Regarding comfort saying a decent mask is comfortable for everyone is just not accurate..everyone has a different comfort level for all kinds of different things..”comfort” is not universal..
As far as a proven measure...There are many highly respected MDs that don’t agree with the effectiveness of masks..Many even go as far as to say that reducing our O2 levels actually lower our immunity..
Facts are facts, and as long as reputable doctors have different opinions I will continue to question the science..
The spirit of the constitution for me applies to all businesses..public or private..The lines between the two are blurred everyday..now more than ever..
Regarding comfort saying a decent mask is comfortable for everyone is just not accurate..everyone has a different comfort level for all kinds of different things..”comfort” is not universal..
As far as a proven measure...There are many highly respected MDs that don’t agree with the effectiveness of masks..Many even go as far as to say that reducing our O2 levels actually lower our immunity..
Facts are facts, and as long as reputable doctors have different opinions I will continue to question the science..
"Unproven" is a strong claim.
Studies have shown it does help.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/19/cor...ansmission-by-75percent-new-study-claims.html
Wearing a face mask can reduce coronavirus transmission by up to 75%, study says
https://fox6now.com/2020/05/20/wear...-transmission-by-up-to-75-percent-study-says/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-some-coronaviruses-study-finds-idUSKBN21L2BW
Results: A total of 21 studies met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses suggest that mask use provided a significant protective effect (OR = 0.35 and 95% CI = 0.24-0.51). Use of masks by healthcare workers (HCWs) and non-healthcare workers (Non-HCWs) can reduce the risk of respiratory virus infection by 80% (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11-0.37) and 47% (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.36-0.79). The protective effect of wearing masks in Asia (OR = 0.31) appeared to be higher than that of Western countries (OR = 0.45). Masks had a protective effect against influenza viruses (OR = 0.55), SARS (OR = 0.26), and SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 0.04). In the subgroups based on different study designs, protective effects of wearing mask were significant in cluster randomized trials, case-control studies and retrospective studies. Conclusions: This study adds additional evidence of the enhanced protective value of masks,
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.03.20051649v1.full.pdf
See above reply.So if I offer up different opinions from qualified professionals , will you reconsider, or will you say those particular experts are wrong?
Out in the open compared to a cramped airplane with recirculated air. Travelling between cities. Solid comparison.Ugh, I forgot leftists only care about COVID when Trump supporters do it. According to them COVID doesnt affect millions of protesters rubbing shoulders, rioting and looting.
If there's a thread that needs to go to the TDS" Mega thread, this is it.
The spirit of the constitution for me applies to all businesses..public or private..The lines between the two are blurred everyday..now more than ever..
Regarding comfort saying a decent mask is comfortable for everyone is just not accurate..everyone has a different comfort level for all kinds of different things..”comfort” is not universal..
As far as a proven measure...There are many highly respected MDs that don’t agree with the effectiveness of masks..Many even go as far as to say that reducing our O2 levels actually lower our immunity..
Facts are facts, and as long as reputable doctors have different opinions I will continue to question the science..
"Unproven" is a strong claim.
Studies have shown it does help.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/19/cor...ansmission-by-75percent-new-study-claims.html
Wearing a face mask can reduce coronavirus transmission by up to 75%, study says
https://fox6now.com/2020/05/20/wear...-transmission-by-up-to-75-percent-study-says/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-some-coronaviruses-study-finds-idUSKBN21L2BW
Results: A total of 21 studies met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses suggest that mask use provided a significant protective effect (OR = 0.35 and 95% CI = 0.24-0.51). Use of masks by healthcare workers (HCWs) and non-healthcare workers (Non-HCWs) can reduce the risk of respiratory virus infection by 80% (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11-0.37) and 47% (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.36-0.79). The protective effect of wearing masks in Asia (OR = 0.31) appeared to be higher than that of Western countries (OR = 0.45). Masks had a protective effect against influenza viruses (OR = 0.55), SARS (OR = 0.26), and SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 0.04). In the subgroups based on different study designs, protective effects of wearing mask were significant in cluster randomized trials, case-control studies and retrospective studies. Conclusions: This study adds additional evidence of the enhanced protective value of masks,
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.03.20051649v1.full.pdf
Are Face Masks Effective Against COVID-19?
The Cleveland Clinic says that gloves do not provide immunity from viruses, and it doesn't permit you to touch everything within reach. Furthermore, germs that come in contact with your gloves could be transferred to all the other surfaces you touch.
Now, even face masks face the same critique as Dr. Blaylock says that exhaled viruses would not be given a chance to escape if wearing a mask. He says that the virus would further concentrate and circulate within the nasal passages and could eventually travel into the brain.
According to Dr. Blaylock, there have been no studies conducted to establish that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has an impact on the transmission of the coronavirus. It was not until recently that the Commission on Disease Control and Prevention changed its guidelines for wearing face masks.
Previously, they only advised sick people to wear protective masks, but now they encourage everyone to wear them when out in public since it has been found out that some could be asymptomatic carriers of the virus. The CDC also has guidelines for wearing cloth masks to slow the spread of the coronavirus.
Ugh, I forgot leftists only care about COVID when Trump supporters do it. According to them COVID doesnt affect millions of protesters rubbing shoulders, rioting and looting.
As if being outside is the same as being in a confined space.
Are they inside or outside?
Are Face Masks Effective Against COVID-19?
The Cleveland Clinic says that gloves do not provide immunity from viruses, and it doesn't permit you to touch everything within reach. Furthermore, germs that come in contact with your gloves could be transferred to all the other surfaces you touch.
Now, even face masks face the same critique as Dr. Blaylock says that exhaled viruses would not be given a chance to escape if wearing a mask. He says that the virus would further concentrate and circulate within the nasal passages and could eventually travel into the brain.
According to Dr. Blaylock, there have been no studies conducted to establish that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has an impact on the transmission of the coronavirus. It was not until recently that the Commission on Disease Control and Prevention changed its guidelines for wearing face masks.
Previously, they only advised sick people to wear protective masks, but now they encourage everyone to wear them when out in public since it has been found out that some could be asymptomatic carriers of the virus. The CDC also has guidelines for wearing cloth masks to slow the spread of the coronavirus.
They are outside and they are literally on top of each other you dishonest shit.Are they inside or outside?
Are then inside private property?
They are outside and they are literally on top of each other you dishonest shit.
You are the dishonest hack for trying to equate a private entity requiring face masks to people out in a public space.
Are they inside or outside?
Are then inside private property?
That is how stupid the US response has been. It took Florida forever to issue stay at home orders and close the beaches. This foot dragging has hurt us dearly.
Well people have been flouting stay at home rules and lockdowns despite what a State says. In many States we all saw those protests agains the lockdowns, of people going to lakes and beaches and bars and not always keeping their distance from others. And we also have some people who refuse to wear masks. So I don't think you can lay the blame on just the Mn State officials. Starting this month more and people are just saying to hell with it all and doing their own thing.
I will say though if the street you are walking has enough foot traffic such that you are invariably going to within a few feet of other people, then I see no problem with State governments requiring you to wear a mask, same goes for congested parks.
Miami Beach park closed after nearly 7,500 warned about not wearing masks
All they had to do was wear a mask to enjoy the outdoors, but that was asking too much for 7500 people.
No shit I was supporting social distancing earlier, because infection rates were exponentional . Things have changed more recently.You are such a clown. You spent months crowing over anyone poking their head out the window, and now you are pretending its 100% ok.
Conservatives are fine with a business' right to deny service to anyone for any reason
until its their stupid asses being denied service.