- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 2,366
- Reaction score
- 776
I think this is info pertinent to people betting the lines still open on various sites. Go to 26:20, and this segment ends at 29:15 . To me, he presents evidence that is difficult to reconcile without accepting significant election fraud in WI.
Summary: In WI, only one exception to providing ID to vote is 'Indefinite confinement' (IC) eg you are bedridden. Prior to 2020, the maximum number of people who asked for this type of absentee voting was 14,000 or so in 2018, which in itself was exceptional. In 2020, it was 169,000. Legally, COVID was not considered a reason sufficient to request this status. Then they checked social media for 10,000 of this group at random. Found about 400, and of those, they concluded only 10 definitely met the standard of IC and 38 were definitely not IC, rest were inconclusive.
There is plenty of other stuff, but this one really stands out.
Can anyone think of a plausible reason for such a spike that is not connected to a systemic attempt to defraud the election in WI? I think the idea that there is 'no evidence' now has been debunked. As Scott Adams says the narrative has now changed from 'no evidence of fraud' to 'judges have found no evidence of fraud'. So, backpedalling has started.
Summary: In WI, only one exception to providing ID to vote is 'Indefinite confinement' (IC) eg you are bedridden. Prior to 2020, the maximum number of people who asked for this type of absentee voting was 14,000 or so in 2018, which in itself was exceptional. In 2020, it was 169,000. Legally, COVID was not considered a reason sufficient to request this status. Then they checked social media for 10,000 of this group at random. Found about 400, and of those, they concluded only 10 definitely met the standard of IC and 38 were definitely not IC, rest were inconclusive.
There is plenty of other stuff, but this one really stands out.
Can anyone think of a plausible reason for such a spike that is not connected to a systemic attempt to defraud the election in WI? I think the idea that there is 'no evidence' now has been debunked. As Scott Adams says the narrative has now changed from 'no evidence of fraud' to 'judges have found no evidence of fraud'. So, backpedalling has started.