- Joined
- Nov 19, 2015
- Messages
- 4,846
- Reaction score
- 1,527
It would be interesting to add a poll if someone could kindly help me out with that.
The fight should never start with different scores in my opinion. It isn’t “cheating”, it is a violation. You get penalized monetarily. If we are going to overturn decisive wins because someone missed weight and both decided to fight anyway, just a cancel it.It's cheating though. You're entering the fight with an unfair advantage.
Docking points for groin shots, low blows, and fence grabs can misrepresent what happens in the fight as well. Somehow I don't feel monetary penalties for these types of cheating would be very effective.
The fight should never start with different scores in my opinion. It isn’t “cheating”, it is a violation. You get penalized monetarily. If we are going to overturn decisive wins because someone missed weight and both decided to fight anyway, just a cancel it.
You can grab the cage Or land low blows multiple times without A point deduction.Again. You can say the same about in-fight fouls. Plenty of otherwise decisive fights have ended in a draw because the winning fighter gets docked for groin strikes or eyepokes. I don't think you can really argue that being significantly heavier is any less an advantage.
It might, but it won't stop fighters who successfully cut unhealthy/large amounts of weightSo you don't think harshly punishing weight misses acts as a deterrent to cutting too much weight?
I like that a lot. But this would only matter if the results mattered to a legit sporting business. With the way the UFC is run, Dana doesn't care and will give fighters who lost fights a better fight next time around. In the end, i'm sure the fighters care more about their money made more than what their record says.They do (did?) something similar in Rizin, but stricter - if you miss weight and win the fight, the result is a no contest. If you lose, it's a loss for you and a win for your opponent.
Too strict? Probably. But the current system is probably too lenient.
He or she kind of has the right to do that considering their opponent didn't drain the last few pounds to make the weight limit. If you're gonna try to weasel around the rules then I should be able to fight in the most annoying way possible to secure me the win.Only issue with that is, the opponent who makes weight could tend to play it a wee bit safer as he is already ahead on the scorecards. It could make him/her fight differently and approach the fight different to how they normally would.
By the same token, there shouldn’t be any penalty for declining the fight if someone misses weight.
The guy who makes weight should get show money.but then there is a financial PUNISHMENT for the guy who did his job and made weight if he doesn’t accept the fight with the guy who didn’t do his job and gave himself a weight advantage, likely by skipping the hard part of the cut which would zap their cardio.
They should.The guy who makes weight should get show money.
I actually like that.They do (did?) something similar in Rizin, but stricter - if you miss weight and win the fight, the result is a no contest. If you lose, it's a loss for you and a win for your opponent.
Too strict? Probably. But the current system is probably too lenient.
I'm speaking about this hypothetically, as if we were actually having reform.They should.
But I don’t think they do, I believe Dana’s stance is “don’t fight don’t get paid” even if the opponent misses weight.
I'm speaking about this hypothetically, as if we were actually having reform.
On the flip side, if the guy who missed weight is down x amount of points, 20% of his purse taken, he may be more inclined to pull out entirely.
I actually think the rules are fine currently. However, if you miss weight more than once, you are forced to move up. No excuses.
You'd have lots of people who missed weight declining to fight.I actually like that.
Make weight.
there’s no easy answer.
punishment too lenient= people abuse the system and “pay a small tax for an advantage”
punishment too strict = pullout city