NBA Playoffs thread - Scientists unite

Status
Not open for further replies.
Care to explain the relevance of an article that doesnt mention free throws once? 4 of the lowest 5 FTA per season years all time have happened in the last 5 years.
Less FTA = less room for error, yet they are shooting at the highest percentages ever for nearly a decade.

You can whine about "not playing defense" or teams chucking up more 3's but my point was about FT%, which is, in fact, higher now than the 90's.
 
What cost Indiana in this game was the fact that they stoped moving the ball around and instead were looking for Haliburton to make a play the last 2 minutes.

Felt like nobody else on the court wanted to take any accountability. Pathetic.
 
Care to explain the relevance of an article that doesnt mention free throws once? 4 of the lowest 5 FTA per season years all time have happened in the last 5 years.
Less FTA = less room for error, yet they are shooting at the highest percentages ever for nearly a decade.

You can whine about "not playing defense" or teams chucking up more 3's but my point was about FT%, which is, in fact, higher now than the 90's.

I highlighted (bolded, whatever) one part of your reply about the scoring...
 
You obviously dont understand what he's saying, he said he could have shot better and if he wasnt injured and if he shot free throws better he'd have more points all time. He said it was his own fault, but he made the ones that mattered (maybe cope but there is truth to it) which just confirms you're a fucking idiot.

There have been multiple times where teammates and even reporters wacthed him practice and he'd sink them routinely.

LMAO this is what you fucking posted with the video, I was pointing out what you said WASN'T IN IT

They unironically were, you're just an idiot.



There are teammates who can even confirm this shit.


So wanna try again, or do you want to change your original statement?

lololollll
 
LMAO this is what you fucking posted with the video, I was pointing out what you said WASN'T IN IT



So wanna try again, or do you want to change your original statement?

lololollll
Yeah you're beyond help, you just mash things together and have a narrative that fits your nonathletic sub 80 IQ brain
 
white flag lol


peace sherbrother
It's really easy to parse through the comments made vs your misunderstanding and continued ignorance on the subject. You just cling to irrelevant shit (the points all time) which is after him talking about how he hit em in practice (confirmed true multiple times with a quick google search) and youre just too fucking stupid to figure it out.
 
No team is trading a contending team for KD. He was traded for Bridges and Cam Johnson, and Cam Johnson's upside was supposed to be higher than he's shown. The 4 picks were in theory filler because the Suns weren't gonna have good picks anyways.

If the Spurs trade Fox or Castle or Fox and the #2 pick this year or some combination its good compensation. Add in some firsts that won't be worth much in the next 2-3 years and its a fair trade. Mikal Bridges just got traded for 5 firsts.

The Rockets already have JSJ, Green, and potentially Whitmore on the table. Sengun too but his price is much higher. That's not including the boatload of picks they have. Unrelated, but I genuinely hope the Rockets trade for Gobert so ANT has more talent. I'd love to see McDaniel, Gobert, and say Dillingham for Sengun, JSJ and Whitmore but I doubt the Rockets do it, even though they've shown they don't think Green, JSJ, or Sengun are cornerstones for their franchise.

The Suns were hurt all year, hired a bum coach, and had zero depth. It's not KD's responsibility to build a roster. That's on the Suns. All 3 of those players are great players. Unfortunately the NBA is a team game. Btw, Nurkic fucking sucks now.

Being a top 10 all time player doesn't mean he's a top 10 all time player right now, that's an absurd thing to say. He's a top 20 player in the league and he's on the downside, but his downside is 25+ PPG on insane efficiency. If he were to play with even Cade Cunningham or something you'd see the primary player go bananas with that spacing.

Apparently KD is looking for a 2 year 100 million dollar contract extension.

I don’t know if I’d give up Fox plus assets for KD at 100M. I’d rather keep fox and add another younger piece / pieces for that 50M a year price tag.

I could see him fitting into some well established teams at a low price, but giving up too much for him is going to take some teams out of contention imo.
 
Apparently KD is looking for a 2 year 100 million dollar contract extension.

I don’t know if I’d give up Fox plus assets for KD at 100M. I’d rather keep fox and add another younger piece / pieces for that 50M a year price tag.

I could see him fitting into some well established teams at a low price, but giving up too much for him is going to take some teams out of contention imo.
the problem with Keeping Fox, Castle, and Dylan Harper is you have 3 ball dominant guards on the roster.
 
the problem with Keeping Fox, Castle, and Dylan Harper is you have 3 ball dominant guards on the roster.

Fair.

They are all young movable pieces though.

Guess it comes down to preference, if I was a GM wanting to win now, I wouldn’t want him for that price 🤷
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top