The most disturbing thought to me has always been in the years preceding toy story 3 the toys would have
spent many nights secretly watching teenage Andy jerk off.
Instead of commenting on the issue your side always jumps to this BS. No one is denying they exist. They dont want young children seeing it and being influenced by it. I dont know why it's so hard to understand the basic idea of not influencing children on sexuality and gender so they grow up without being influenced.Gay people exist, despite your wishes to deny that fact.
What you just said is an ignorant conspiracy theory. Parents don't want their children influenced by LGBTQ propaganda. It's that simple and has nothing to do with dehumanizing anyone.Can I offer a different perspective?
I think the chances this has anything to do with "grooming" are about a billion to one. I think that narrative allows people to feel like they're protecting kids while blocking any attempt to normalize alternative lifestyles. Do you honestly think they're trying to create generations of twinks to feast on? Doesn't that sound ridiculous on it's face?
It wasn't that long ago it was illegal in some parts of the western world to be gay, if convicted you could be chemically castrated. Even now, coming out of the closet is terrifying for a lot of people. It's estimated that about 5% of people are gay and it isn't a choice, so keeping people scared isn't going to help anyone. Talking about homosexuality won't make people gay but pretending it's a mental illness makes a lot of people miserable.
This is why there's such liberal opposition to the The Parental Rights in Education bill. It feels very much like parents don't want teachers to tell kids being gay isn't a disease and gay people are human too. It's like parents want to be sure they can couch it as something terrible so their kids will at least pretend to be straight.
Well that's a compelling reason for why it should be included in children's' movies.Gay people exist, despite your wishes to deny that fact.
What you just said is an ignorant conspiracy theory. Parents don't want their children influenced by LGBTQ propaganda. It's that simple and has nothing to do with dehumanizing anyone.
Why children's movies? Is representation in adult shows not good enough?
STDs exist, so maybe Buzz Lightyear can come down with AIDS in the next movie to spread awareness to 6 year olds.
Rapists exist, swear words are pretty damn common, sluts exist, "throuples", orgies, drug use, cutters exist. STDs exist, so maybe Buzz Lightyear can come down with AIDS in the next movie to spread awareness to 6 year olds.
Since the invention of movies there have been 1000's of kissing scenes in movies geared towards kids so let's not pretend it's something new and if the whole thought of same sex kissing bothers people, trust me your kid is gonna become gay because they saw two people of the same sex kissing in a movie. Besides at the end of the day if it bothers some parents that much then just don't buy a ticket to see the damn movie.Instead of commenting on the issue your side always jumps to this BS. No one is denying they exist. They dont want young children seeing it and being influenced by it. I dont know why it's so hard to understand the basic idea of not influencing children on sexuality and gender so they grow up without being influenced.
bulletproof argument right there.We think it should exist in kids movies because it exists in the real world.
Can’t wait for Pixar to animate Mr. Hands into the next G-rated moviebulletproof argument right there.
getting buttfucked by a donkey also exists in this world.
Instead of commenting on the issue your side always jumps to this BS. No one is denying they exist. They dont want young children seeing it and being influenced by it. I dont know why it's so hard to understand the basic idea of not influencing children on sexuality and gender so they grow up without being influenced.
You mean the movie that takes place in Canada was made for china?How about adding a gay kissing scene in that red panda movie you just made for china?
Disney has no balls and talking out both sides of their mouth.
Why is a gay kiss closer to portraying rape or disease more so than a straight kiss?Well that's a compelling reason for why it should be included in children's' movies.
Bondage freaks exist too, so clearly we need cartoons in leather daddy costumes whipping each other. Rapists exist, swear words are pretty damn common, sluts exist, "throuples", orgies, drug use, cutters exist. STDs exist, so maybe Buzz Lightyear can come down with AIDS in the next movie to spread awareness to 6 year olds.