Opinion PINO - Populist In Name Only

THEY FAILED. AGAIN.

🄳

TR smiles down on the nation from the heavens, his greatest legacy preserved for another generation of Americans.


mike_lee_public_lands.jpeg


Facing overwhelming opposition from all Democrats and a growing number in his own party, Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee tonight withdrew his proposal to sell millions of acres of public land to help balance the federal budget.

Senate leaders, hurriedly working to get the budget to a floor vote this weekend, gave Lee the opportunity to pull his provision, pages 202 to 211 of the thousand-page Big Beautiful Bill, knowing that it would have faced certain defeat by the Republican-majority Senate. That language would have forced the sale of BLM land in 11 Western states to offset tax cuts and royalty rebates to gas and oil drillers.

The language in those pages, sponsored and revised over the last two weeks by Lee, would have created the largest disposal of public land since the Homestead Act. Tens of thousands of hunters, anglers, hikers, and public-land recreationists have pummeled the offices of their congressional delegations with increasingly strident demands to kill Lee’s bill.

That continued pressure from a broad and vocal coalition of rural hunters, suburban hikers, livestock producers, Main Street business owners, anglers, dirtbag climbers, and whitewater rafters made the difference, says Montanan Randy Newberg, host of Fresh Tracks and a vocal public-land advocate.

ā€œMike Lee did something that we’ve not been able to do, to have all Americans become focused on one issue, no partisanship, no Rs, no Ds, and in the process I hope they have sent a message that public lands are that third rail of American politics,ā€ says Newberg, one of several social-media personalities who rallied his audience around defending public lands. ā€œI think you could also say the same of the Senate, they put partisanship aside to kill this bad idea.ā€
 
Trump thinks Americans are too retarded to work in factories
 
Given over 75 million people voted for him I'm starting to have trouble arguing this.

I got a homie who is a high-up at Lockheed. I should hit him up and see if hes about to let go of his whole team on account of Trump said they're talentless.
 
Exhibit H - "Trump to interview BlackRock's Rieder for Fed chair role"


wcw-chris.gif
 
Credit where it's due, and congrats on not blindly supporting everything your imaginary "team" does, even things so clearly the opposite of what he promised.

I still chuckle at the "This is what I voted for." Group when MOST of what he's doing is the opposite of what he said he would do. I don't get why people don't understand that you can disagree with liberals but still not stick your head in the sand on Trump. He is failing on almost every level to deliver what people actually thought (or claimed to think) they were voting for.
 
Back
Top