Pecker Problems (Mueller+ Investigation Thread v. 21)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fawlty said:
You aren't swerving into a troll in an attempt to cover for your stupidity. You are stupid. And bad at trolling.
Click to expand...

No need to call people names just because you are an idiot that cant even count to potato unless it has the answer on wikipedia.

Its all fun and games until you get called names.
 
computer fogie said:
_103131010_us_impeachment_640-3x-nc.png


There is a trial, just like if he had been arrested by police.
Click to expand...

its not the same thing. it is not a criminal trial
 
god i gotta fight 2 idiots and 2 mods now, literally just read the words.

CONGRESS CANNOT CHARGE ANYONE WITH A CRIME. THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WAS PUT INTO PLACE AS PART OF THE CHECKS AND BALANCES. WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS THAT THE PRESIDENT CAN CHARGE PEOPLE WITH CRIMES. WHICH HE CANNOT DO. JUST LIKE THE CONGRESSIONAL BRANCH.
 
You can't save yourself from this one. Just stop, man.
 
RockstarChris said:
god i gotta fight 2 idiots and 2 mods now, literally just read the words.

CONGRESS CANNOT CHARGE ANYONE WITH A CRIME. THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WAS PUT INTO PLACE AS PART OF THE CHECKS AND BALANCES. WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS THAT THE PRESIDENT CAN CHARGE PEOPLE WITH CRIMES. WHICH HE CANNOT DO. JUST LIKE THE CONGRESSIONAL BRANCH.
Click to expand...
You’re really, really dumb.

The DoJ is under the President. The President’s subordinates charge people with crimes all the time. The Judicial branch is not strictly in charge of charging people with crimes. It is in charge of ensuring that the proceedings are carried out according to the law.

Other nations like Italy specifically are different in that their Judicial system is also the branch that indicts. The US is not like that. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

And no, it’s been spelled out for you over and over. Congress has a special power called impeachment for charging and potentially convicting officers of the US government, including the President, with crimes.
 
ChainFlow said:
You’re really, really dumb.

The DoJ is under the President. The President’s subordinates charge people with crimes all the time. The Judicial branch is not in charge of charging people with crimes. It is in charge of ensuring that the proceedings are carried out according to the law.

Other nations like Italy specifically are different in that their Judicial system is also the branch that indicts. The US is not like that. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

And no, it’s been spelled out for you over and over. Congress has a special power called impeachment for charging and potentially convicting officers of the US government, including the President, with crimes.
Click to expand...

impeaching someone doesnt charge them with a crime. it removes them from office. then the congress can write a letter to the justice department suggesting criminal charges.

bye felicia
 
RockstarChris said:
impeaching someone doesnt charge them with a crime. it removes them from office. then the congress can write a letter to the justice department suggesting criminal charges.

bye felicia
Click to expand...
The House of Representatives shall ... have the sole Power of Impeachment.

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

It’s a conviction. The penalty is removal from office. Then further convictions on garden variety charges can be sought.

Why do you waste so many posts arguing that a conviction isn’t a conviction?
 
ChainFlow said:
The House of Representatives shall ... have the sole Power of Impeachment.

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

It’s a conviction. The penalty is removal from office. Then further convictions on garden variety charges can be sought.

Why do you waste so many posts arguing that a conviction isn’t a conviction?
Click to expand...

Sounds like you came late to the party and have no clue what we are talking about. Come back when you read the thread.
 
RockstarChris said:
you guys realize the President cant ever be charged with a crime right?
Click to expand...

Let's live in your reality for a second, shall we? What you are suggesting is that someone running for President could get the help of every swinging dick nation, hack into everything and even change the vote tallies in ever state and at the end of the day nothing will happen to him because, in your reality, the President cant ever be charged with a crime right?

Read that a few times and realize how stupid you sound.
 
Ophydian said:
Let's live in your reality for a second, shall we? What you are suggesting is that someone running for President could get the help of every swinging dick nation, hack into everything and even change the vote tallies in ever state and at the end of the day nothing will happen to him because, in your reality, the President cant ever be charged with a crime right?

Read that a few times and realize how stupid you sound.
Click to expand...
No they can be charged with a crime by the Judiciary Branch of the government if they are impeached by Congress and no longer President. If they are not impeached. Then yes. Nothing will happen.
 
RockstarChris said:
No they can be charged with a crime by the Judiciary Branch of the government if they are impeached by Congress and no longer President. If they are not impeached. Then yes. Nothing will happen.
Click to expand...

I'll concede here. You went all retarded approach in the beginning but technically speaking you are correct. This was more a trick question as one could perceive when you mean President that you are not talking about the process of impeachment.

Almost like hur dur the President can't be convicted of a crimes UNLESS 1 2 3 4 5

Never the less technically you win. So you get a like. And we share a similar first name so theres that.
 
Ophydian said:
I'll concede here. You went all retarded approach in the beginning but technically speaking you are correct. This was more a trick question as one could perceive when you mean President that you are not talking about the process of impeachment.

Almost like hur dur the President can't be convicted of a crimes UNLESS 1 2 3 4 5

Never the less technically you win. So you get a like. And we share a similar first name so theres that.
Click to expand...
i was clear from the beginning, people just seem to get things confused. I did say earlier that the President cant get arrested for jaywalking. Technically he can get arrested for jaywalking if congress convenes a session and votes to impeach the President and then sends a letter to the justice department strongly recommending that the President be charged with jaywalking and then the local district attorney can file a warrent on the former President for alleged jaywalking and then the former President, as an american citizen, can be put on trial in front of a jury of his peers to determine his innocence or guilt.

Dear god I hope that is /thread

#justanotherchris
 
RockstarChris said:
god i gotta fight 2 idiots and 2 mods now, literally just read the words.

CONGRESS CANNOT CHARGE ANYONE WITH A CRIME. THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WAS PUT INTO PLACE AS PART OF THE CHECKS AND BALANCES. WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS THAT THE PRESIDENT CAN CHARGE PEOPLE WITH CRIMES. WHICH HE CANNOT DO. JUST LIKE THE CONGRESSIONAL BRANCH.
Click to expand...


You are so fucking stupid
Clause 6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Clause 7: Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
Click to expand...
 
Limbo Pete said:
There's something really weird and messed up about people arguing the President can't be charged with crimes lol
Yeeeeesh
Click to expand...
If he's got a (D) next to his name, well now, that's different

A Democrat POTUS can absolutely be charged with crimes.
It's all about party, you see
 
Let's imagine that a POTUS hired someone for a contract killing.

We can't do shit about that?

... Huh. Kinda surprised it's set up that the president is a dictator
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,648
Messages
58,307,437
Members
175,999
Latest member
joshvegas

Share this page

Back
Top