Law ***PAYBACK: Barr Assigns Top Prosecutor to Russia BS / UPDATE REPORT LEAKS START***

Is this IT?

  • Total voters
    94
Status
Not open for further replies.
computer fogie said:
I'm really not interested enough to take the time to read up on all of it. When something of substance happens, I'll read about it. But all this bluster and infighting bores me.
Click to expand...



Something of Substance?



Please list all the times a statement was released by someone with higher authority than the IG, telling the public the IG is wrong.


We’ll wait.
 
andnowweknow said:
ah...the neverending Durham investigation (Barr investigation) with "stuff" in it.

any word on when this report will drop in any specificity?
Click to expand...


^^^ liberals


<{Heymansnicker}>



The only people convinced they know more the the AG, because they watch cnn...
 
andnowweknow said:
what would the bet be, I said a lot.
Click to expand...


That Durham will find wrongdoing.


Think carefully, yesterday’s statement was unprecedented. Do you really think he released that for no reason? You realize it’s turned into a criminal investigation, right?
 
computer fogie said:
I know, even with 23 thousand posts! You would think that more posts equals more knowledge of this stuff, huh?
Click to expand...

There is a general assumption that a person would, at the very least, inform themselves on the minimal basics of a topic before engaging a discussion.
Having said that I must admit sherdog has once again lowerd my bar of expectation, I will pay more attention to who I respond to in the future.
If a person as a high post count and is uninformed it proves their more interested in meddling than learning or contributing but to each their own.
 
bobgeese said:
That Durham will find wrongdoing.


Think carefully, yesterday’s statement was unprecedented. Do you really think he released that for no reason? You realize it’s turned into a criminal investigation, right?
Click to expand...

Let me repeat that in BIG LETTERS since you're dealing with idiots with a kindergarten-level education :


"YOU....REALIZE...IT'S....TURNED...INTO...A....CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION, RIGHT?"


I even bolded the part that needs to be drilled into that thick skull of his.
 
SBJJ said:
Lol. And here we go.

At least 2 pages coming of weasling out of his hyperbolic posts
Click to expand...

"what would the bet be?"

Didn't he pull the SAME EXACT SHIT last time? <45><45><45>
 
bobgeese said:
That Durham will find wrongdoing.


Think carefully, yesterday’s statement was unprecedented. Do you really think he released that for no reason? You realize it’s turned into a criminal investigation, right?
Click to expand...
lol...you're gonna have to be more specific.

He gave absolutely zero reasoning or evidence to back up his response to the IG report yesterday.

I would also like to know when this "report" is supposed to come out if you know anything on that front.
 
andnowweknow said:
ah...the neverending Durham investigation (Barr investigation) with "stuff" in it.

any word on when this report will drop in any specificity?
Click to expand...


Here ya go.

"That's why we have Durham," Barr said, referring to the ongoing investigation by Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, which is broader in scope than Horowitz's review.

"Durham is able to look at all the evidence," Barr said. He specifically referred to Durham's ability to talk to other government agencies and private parties, and to compel testimony.

Barr’s remarks echo what he said in a blistering NBC interview earlier Tuesday.



https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barr-blasts-fbi
 
This is sweet revenge, love it. Their using an investigation to help swing an election only this time the investigation is warranted and not corrupt like the witch hunt.

It's beautiful.
 
Tropodan said:
This is sweet revenge, love it. Their using an investigation to help swing an election only this time the investigation is warranted and not corrupt like the witch hunt.

It's beautiful.
Click to expand...

All the leftist hacks have been wrong on virtually everything and now this. Ha, they continue to clothe and bury themselves in wrong.
It's not been easy but "be patient grasshopper".

 
Just a friendly reminder that Durham's investigation was expanded to the Pentagon in November.
This is so cool.


https://bongino.com/u-s-attorney-john-durhams-russia-probe-expands-to-pentagon/

.S. Attorney John Durham’s probe into the handling of the Trump-Russia investigation is expanding to the Pentagon office where FBI informant Stefan Halper was contracted, according to a report by Sara Carter.



Durham is questioning personnel at the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment which granted Halper numerous government contracts.

According to Carter, “multiple sources” confirmed that “Durham has spoken extensively with sources working in the Office of Net Assessment, as well as outside contractors, that were paid through Pentagon office.”
Halper was the FBI’s inside source to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

He asked [Trump campaign volunteer George] Papadapoulos to fly to London to discuss international relations and the possibility of Papadopoulos writing a policy paper on a gas field in the Mediterranean for $3,000.

However, this was all cover so Halper could try to fish information out of Papadapous. Once they met, Halper was quick to turn to the subject of Russia, asking Papadopoulos, “You know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?” Papadopoulos didn’t offer up any information, and contact with Halper didn’t extend much past that trip. Papadapoulos would finish and submit his policy paper to Halper, but there’s no evidence it was ever used for anything.

So where did that comment about Hillary’s emails come from?

Months prior, Papadapoulos had a serious of meetings with Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor who at one point claimed to have Hillary Clinton’s hacked emails (he didn’t), and Alexander Downer, an Australian diplomat whom Papadopoulos would (allegedly drunkenly) tell he (falsely) had possession of Hillary’s emails. Mifsud reportedly only became interested in Papadapoulos after learning of his role within the Trump campaign, while Downer requested his meeting with Papadapoulos. Both are of note because Mifsud is on record having donated to the Clinton Foundation, and Downer helped broker a $25 million donation from the Australian government to the Clinton Foundation. Neither were political allies of Papadapoulos, but had their sights on him.

Why? To help further a narrative about Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, which Halper was well aware of.
 
glenwo2 said:
"what would the bet be?"

Didn't he pull the SAME EXACT SHIT last time? <45><45><45>
Click to expand...

Yea. He will puss out just like every other time

Lol! Why does he even open those pink lips and talk shit?
 
unimackpass said:
Just a friendly reminder that Durham's investigation was expanded to the Pentagon in November.
This is so cool.


https://bongino.com/u-s-attorney-john-durhams-russia-probe-expands-to-pentagon/

.S. Attorney John Durham’s probe into the handling of the Trump-Russia investigation is expanding to the Pentagon office where FBI informant Stefan Halper was contracted, according to a report by Sara Carter.



Durham is questioning personnel at the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment which granted Halper numerous government contracts.

According to Carter, “multiple sources” confirmed that “Durham has spoken extensively with sources working in the Office of Net Assessment, as well as outside contractors, that were paid through Pentagon office.”
Halper was the FBI’s inside source to infiltrate the Trump campaign.

He asked [Trump campaign volunteer George] Papadapoulos to fly to London to discuss international relations and the possibility of Papadopoulos writing a policy paper on a gas field in the Mediterranean for $3,000.

However, this was all cover so Halper could try to fish information out of Papadapous. Once they met, Halper was quick to turn to the subject of Russia, asking Papadopoulos, “You know about hacking the emails from Russia, right?” Papadopoulos didn’t offer up any information, and contact with Halper didn’t extend much past that trip. Papadapoulos would finish and submit his policy paper to Halper, but there’s no evidence it was ever used for anything.

So where did that comment about Hillary’s emails come from?

Months prior, Papadapoulos had a serious of meetings with Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese professor who at one point claimed to have Hillary Clinton’s hacked emails (he didn’t), and Alexander Downer, an Australian diplomat whom Papadopoulos would (allegedly drunkenly) tell he (falsely) had possession of Hillary’s emails. Mifsud reportedly only became interested in Papadapoulos after learning of his role within the Trump campaign, while Downer requested his meeting with Papadapoulos. Both are of note because Mifsud is on record having donated to the Clinton Foundation, and Downer helped broker a $25 million donation from the Australian government to the Clinton Foundation. Neither were political allies of Papadapoulos, but had their sights on him.

Why? To help further a narrative about Russian collusion with the Trump campaign, which Halper was well aware of.
Click to expand...

John "Bull" Durham is going to destroy the Left. lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,246
Messages
57,977,274
Members
175,889
Latest member
Anas mohamed

Share this page

Back
Top