Opinion Passionate Takedown of String Theory

This woman is a doctor of physics who was a fan of all the pop culture physics of string theory in the 90s. She believes that experimental particle physicists had their reputations ruined because 30 years of flem flam men selling defunct, not even wrong string theory caused the public to conflate phycisists and philosophers and liars. The damage to particle physists' reputatiion made communicating and getting funding harder.


Did she at any time provide any data to support her complaints? Got any more detailed cliffs of this video since it's nearly an hour long? I'm not sitting through an hour of whining about string theory.
 
I suspect that like with most things there are trends and patterns people follow and get excited about which would explain why it got so popular. Plus it's pretty darn interesting.

I'm not smart enough to understand or know what the current trends or models are
 
Did she at any time provide any data to support her complaints? Got any more detailed cliffs of this video since it's nearly an hour long? I'm not sitting through an hour of whining about string theory.

She explains her position perfectly.
 
I have no idea what you guys are talking about.

Anyone able to make this remedial?

I envy and admire people who know what this is.

I'm not one of those people.

There are two different theories that explain most of the universe. The standard model predicts how the smallest bits of matter behave. Relativity describes large scale structures like the universe, space, and time. The two theories don't go together, and you can't use them together, so we don't know how the whole universe works, leaving mysteries like the big bang, how black holes work, and so on. Some people think that there should be a formula that puts them together, so that relativity has a description on small scale components of gravity and time.

String theory was supposed to bridge the gap and put the two theories together, but it never was able to produce anything, and now many physicists believe that there is no reason that there should be a way to combine them. There is no experimental evidence, or observations, to make anyone believe that there is even a reason to merge those two theories, other than we have a taste for something like that existing.

String theory has tons of beautiful ideas, cool math, and a lot of the smartest people sunk cost in decades trying to make it work, but it hasn't. Worse, string theorists were so effective at publicly advocating for it, and lied to make it sound like it was the next best thing, that it put a lot of people off.
 
There are two different theories that explain most of the universe. The standard model predicts how the smallest bits of matter behave. Relativity describes large scale structures like the universe, space, and time. The two theories don't go together, and you can't use them together, so we don't know how the whole universe works, leaving mysteries like the big bang, how black holes work, and so on. Some people think that there should be a formula that puts them together, so that relativity has a description on small scale components of gravity and time.

String theory was supposed to bridge the gap and put the two theories together, but it never was able to produce anything, and now many physicists believe that there is no reason that there should be a way to combine them. There is no experimental evidence, or observations, to make anyone believe that there is even a reason to merge those two theories, other than we have a taste for something like that existing.

String theory has tons of beautiful ideas, cool math, and a lot of the smartest people sunk cost in decades trying to make it work, but it hasn't. Worse, string theorists were so effective at publicly advocating for it, and lied to make it sound like it was the next best thing, that it put a lot of people off.

Thank you very much! I really appreciate that synopsis.
 
you know how we can see things so small down to the cellular level thanks to microscopes etc.?

well what if we are that tiny, or tinier to much, much larger and all-powerful beings unknown to us?

giphy.gif
 
There are two different theories that explain most of the universe. The standard model predicts how the smallest bits of matter behave. Relativity describes large scale structures like the universe, space, and time. The two theories don't go together, and you can't use them together, so we don't know how the whole universe works, leaving mysteries like the big bang, how black holes work, and so on. Some people think that there should be a formula that puts them together, so that relativity has a description on small scale components of gravity and time.

String theory was supposed to bridge the gap and put the two theories together, but it never was able to produce anything, and now many physicists believe that there is no reason that there should be a way to combine them. There is no experimental evidence, or observations, to make anyone believe that there is even a reason to merge those two theories, other than we have a taste for something like that existing.

String theory has tons of beautiful ideas, cool math, and a lot of the smartest people sunk cost in decades trying to make it work, but it hasn't. Worse, string theorists were so effective at publicly advocating for it, and lied to make it sound like it was the next best thing, that it put a lot of people off.
What did they lie about? I genuinely have no idea what you could be referring to here.
 
Back
Top