- Joined
- Dec 20, 2010
- Messages
- 30,799
- Reaction score
- 7,621
Haitian prosties? Talk about Russian roulette AIDS edition.
They actually use some chicken-killing ritual over there that kills the AIDS virus. So no worries.
Haitian prosties? Talk about Russian roulette AIDS edition.
I'd rather put a bullet in my fucking head.
Penny Mordaunt: Oxfam 'failed in moral leadership' - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43020875
Charity workers in Haiti used prostitutes and now there is a major backlash.
Why do prudish people's morals need to dictate what is acceptable?
People have sex, always have and always will. It's time that people mind their own business. These workers volunteered to go and help clean up the mess in Haiti. From everything I've read, I have yet to find an accusation of anyone using government funds to pay the prostitutes. All I've found is that the sex took place in the villa, which was financed by the government funded charity- an expense that was occurring anyway.
This story pisses me off. First of all, there was a group who went to help the people of Haiti. The could have told the Haitians to go fuck themselves and washed their hands of it, as many Haitians actually did. Many Haitians were granted a temporary stay in USA, but refused to return to Haiti after their visas had expired. They have abandoned their own country, which I find disgusting. No one is pointing the finger at any of them. TheHaitians who refuse to go back and rebuild their own country are not being criticized.
The only people being criticized are the volunteer workers.... Because they had sex?
Big fucking deal.
Ok you got me.
You know you want it, dawg.
Ok you got me.
She'll be keeping an eye out for you.
the charity workers should be thanked for engaging in exploitative sex tourism?Prostitution should be legal and the workers should be thanked, not criticized for participating in adult activities.
that's low, man
You know you want it, dawg.
Is this trolling? Prostitution is illegal, the girls were reportedly under age (age of consent is 18) and sex tourism is inherently exploitative.
that's low, man
That's the line, right there. If they signed on under a code of conduct that explicitly forbids it, there's not really any defense.The reports about abuse and under age prostitutes (aged 14-16) came from other Oxfam workers. These were the allegations that sparked off their internal investigation and lead to those involved being fired.
Regardless of your personal views on prostitution, you have to admit that travelling to disaster struck areas and illegally paying survivors for prostitution when you're there to provide charitable aid, is inherently exploitative. Perhaps you've read about the prostitution of Syrian/Iraqi war refugees?
That's probably why it's against UN guidelines for charities and why Oxfam added it to their code of conduct.
Oxfam views prostitution as a human rights violation. Sooooo.....Going to a country just to exploit its disaster for sex would be wrong
But they went there to help and in their spare time screwed willing people for cash..seems an important difference!
At what point after a disaster is screwing prozzies no longer exploititive and juat regular prostituion use ? I mean if i go to new orleans and screw a hooker there does that not count? What about in serbia?
the charity workers should be thanked for engaging in exploitative sex tourism?
Well oxfam.is wrongOxfam views prostitution as a human rights violation. Sooooo.....