You just told me that they had Punk losing and losing. Now you tell me that they did....?
We all know that simply giving someone a title reign isn't trying. Rey Rey was champ for 3 or 4 months and they made sure his reign was a joke.
Punk shouldn't have main'd over Rock/Cena nor should've wanted to.
The problem I have is that they didn't try. And we need not to pretend that they did. If they really wanted to try, they would give him the Triple H 1999 treatment instead of the Rey Rey 2006 treatment even if his held the belt for a long time.
A 434 day reign as WWE Champion wasn't trying with him? Longest reign since Hogan and that ain't trying? Spent that run going over Cena, Bryan, Kane, Jericho, ADR, Ryback, The Miz and basically every guy that could possibly main event during that era and that ain't trying? The guy ran through their entire roster and that ain't trying? LMAO bruh
Punk had a lukewarm reign from a drawing and buyrate standpoint and they still kept trying and trying with him at the top during it, they even tried switching him to heel and gave him Heyman mid way through his reign to try and breath life back in to him.
Yeah he lost and lost in 2013 to Rock, Taker, Brock, Cena, which means he was washed and not prime for a WM main event in 2014, but losing to those guys is an easy recovery. A lot of champions have a down year after they lose the belt where they're not "the guy" when there's stacked rosters, most of them recover and become the guy again. Was CM Punk not capable of that? Dude didn't even try and took his ball and went home instead. Dude literally said in interviews him not being handed the main event of Wrestlemania is the reason he walked out, when people roasted him hard for it, he changed his story to him leaving because of staph infection lol
Imagine John Cena, Triple H, The Rock, Steve Austin, Randy Orton, etc. walking out of the company because they didn't get to main event the show at the exact moment they wanted to, regardless if it was the right time or not lol