- Joined
- Jul 4, 2009
- Messages
- 69,951
- Reaction score
- 43,010
"But what about..."Right wing NPC.exe "good lord you're triggered"
"But what about..."Right wing NPC.exe "good lord you're triggered"
I literally found pages of you also saying "what about..." That's a retarded criticism and hypocritical too.
The critique is that this thread is about Biden's obvious mental decline and people are coming in with "But but Trump did this..." That's a classic whataboutism.
This is rich considering you completely dodged my question.So you can't defend the post and are reduced to a grammar Nazi to try to escape.
Not an excuse but I'm typing on a phone mostly one handed while doing other things.
Excuses and definition from the party that now makes their number 1 policy protecting illegals including gangs members and criminals.
He's been alternating for years between publicly trying to have me banned and putting me on ignore.I literally found pages of you also saying "what about..." That's a retarded criticism and hypocritical too.
The critique is that this thread is about Biden's obvious mental decline and people are coming in with "But but Trump did this..." That's a classic whataboutism.
He's been alternating for years between publicly trying to have me banned and putting me on ignore.
Neither thought has ever crossed my mind. Stop writing fan fiction and stick to empty posting.

But unlike you I actually have evidence to back up my claim. Putin invaded Ukraine on the president before and the president after Trump but didn't invade under Trump.
Which one do you think is worse att?I look forward to the same book about Trump coming out in 2028. We got Trump out here napping in public all the time.
Stop electing old men, America.
The fact that you think that is "evidence" of your claim tells me you have no idea what evidence actually is. "Putin didn't invade Ukraine under Trump's first term ergo he wouldn't have under his second" isn't even circumstantial evidence; it's literally just an argument from ignorance which is one of the most common fallacies you'll find.
Now you are just arguing pure semantics, whether you call it evidence or pattern recognition isn't really important, there is more than enough information for a person with a reasonable IQ to be able to conclude there was a high probability that Putin would not have invaded during Trump's term.
The reason why Putin invaded during Obama's and Biden's terms but not Trumps is because he smelled weakness. Obama demonstrated weakness with that line in the sand comment that he didn't back up. And Biden demonstrated weakness with that disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal. Geopolitics is a lot like poker, if you show weakness a shark like Putin will exploit it, steal your blinds and bully you out of pots. But if you are unpredictable like Trump they won't know how to deal with you and will show respect and wait for a better spot to make their moves.
The idea you think Putin cooked up an invasion on a whim because he sniffed weakness is evidence of your ignorance.
A invasion like that takes literal years of planning. This isn't a video game kiddo.
Nonce sense, 9 months is more than enough time. And given how it initially panned out it certainly didn't look like they had but years of planning into it.
This is the truth. Some just attack law enforcement to try and storm a government facility.This is rich considering you completely dodged my question.
Which nugget would you like me to defend, this strawman below or your oh so clever TDS zinger you hit me with ?
I'm sure plenty of news outlets would agree with you. The same ones that said Biden was sharp as a tack and that Kamala was going to win Iowa and take the Presidency.I doubt it's much of a majority after these last 4 months.