• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Opinion Original Sin - the biden cover up

I literally found pages of you also saying "what about..." That's a retarded criticism and hypocritical too.

The critique is that this thread is about Biden's obvious mental decline and people are coming in with "But but Trump did this..." That's a classic whataboutism.

There aren't pages of me saying "what about.." and only what about.

You're such a weirdo.

That guy is just an empty poster, it's all he does. He's even worse than @CantCucktheTuck which is kind of crazy.
 
So you can't defend the post and are reduced to a grammar Nazi to try to escape.

Not an excuse but I'm typing on a phone mostly one handed while doing other things.
This is rich considering you completely dodged my question.

Which nugget would you like me to defend, this strawman below or your oh so clever TDS zinger you hit me with ?


Excuses and definition from the party that now makes their number 1 policy protecting illegals including gangs members and criminals.
 
I literally found pages of you also saying "what about..." That's a retarded criticism and hypocritical too.

The critique is that this thread is about Biden's obvious mental decline and people are coming in with "But but Trump did this..." That's a classic whataboutism.
He's been alternating for years between publicly trying to have me banned and putting me on ignore.
 
But unlike you I actually have evidence to back up my claim. Putin invaded Ukraine on the president before and the president after Trump but didn't invade under Trump.

The fact that you think that is "evidence" of your claim tells me you have no idea what evidence actually is. "Putin didn't invade Ukraine under Trump's first term ergo he wouldn't have under his second" isn't even circumstantial evidence; it's literally just an argument from ignorance which is one of the most common fallacies you'll find.
 
f893a601aa7b29af6cc1303be1226322e0c8c74cf402503d07288feb45e7fd7f.jpg
 
I look forward to the same book about Trump coming out in 2028. We got Trump out here napping in public all the time.
Stop electing old men, America.
 
I look forward to the same book about Trump coming out in 2028. We got Trump out here napping in public all the time.
Stop electing old men, America.
Which one do you think is worse att?
 
The fact that you think that is "evidence" of your claim tells me you have no idea what evidence actually is. "Putin didn't invade Ukraine under Trump's first term ergo he wouldn't have under his second" isn't even circumstantial evidence; it's literally just an argument from ignorance which is one of the most common fallacies you'll find.

Now you are just arguing pure semantics, whether you call it evidence or pattern recognition isn't really important, there is more than enough information for a person with a reasonable IQ to be able to conclude there was a high probability that Putin would not have invaded during Trump's term.

The reason why Putin invaded during Obama's and Biden's terms but not Trumps is because he smelled weakness. Obama demonstrated weakness with that line in the sand comment that he didn't back up. And Biden demonstrated weakness with that disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal. Geopolitics is a lot like poker, if you show weakness a shark like Putin will exploit it, steal your blinds and bully you out of pots. But if you are unpredictable like Trump they won't know how to deal with you and will show respect and wait for a better spot to make their moves.
 
Now you are just arguing pure semantics, whether you call it evidence or pattern recognition isn't really important, there is more than enough information for a person with a reasonable IQ to be able to conclude there was a high probability that Putin would not have invaded during Trump's term.

The reason why Putin invaded during Obama's and Biden's terms but not Trumps is because he smelled weakness. Obama demonstrated weakness with that line in the sand comment that he didn't back up. And Biden demonstrated weakness with that disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal. Geopolitics is a lot like poker, if you show weakness a shark like Putin will exploit it, steal your blinds and bully you out of pots. But if you are unpredictable like Trump they won't know how to deal with you and will show respect and wait for a better spot to make their moves.

The idea you think Putin cooked up an invasion on a whim because he sniffed weakness is evidence of your ignorance.

A invasion like that takes literal years of planning. This isn't a video game kiddo.
 
The idea you think Putin cooked up an invasion on a whim because he sniffed weakness is evidence of your ignorance.

A invasion like that takes literal years of planning. This isn't a video game kiddo.

Nonce sense, 9 months is more than enough time. And given how it initially panned out it certainly didn't look like they had but years of planning into it.
 
Some of you guys have forum stalkers, people trying to get you banned, nemesis', arch-enemies, etc.

The only thing I have is Deaths Head. You get what you deserve I guess.
 
This is rich considering you completely dodged my question.

Which nugget would you like me to defend, this strawman below or your oh so clever TDS zinger you hit me with ?
This is the truth. Some just attack law enforcement to try and storm a government facility.

Man that sounds familiar, like an insurrection or something.
 
All I know is this country is in much better shape now and the future looks better with Trump in office. I dont care for some thi mngs he says or his antics but hes not a bad president - the dems minds are just broke .

I dont think Bidens mind being gone and Dems covering it up is an issue anyone with a lick of sense knew it and also k ew the dems an media were lying . I'm juat glad Biden an whatever is left of his mind are gone!
 
I doubt it's much of a majority after these last 4 months.
I'm sure plenty of news outlets would agree with you. The same ones that said Biden was sharp as a tack and that Kamala was going to win Iowa and take the Presidency.
 
Back
Top