- Joined
- Nov 1, 2006
- Messages
- 12,486
- Reaction score
- 3,224
The Ohio Senate passed a bill requiring women to express in writing a preferred disposal method for their aborted fetus(es). It passed on a 23-10 party-line vote. The Ohio Department of Health would collect records on disposals.
"Republican Representative Kyle Koehler says that discovery of what Planned Parenthood does with aborted babies moved him to sponsor legislation to require the burial or cremation of an aborted fetus.
“Somehow being able to tell my children that the reports of selling baby body parts are possibly not true because the actual truth is that they may be throwing them into Ohio landfills does not make me feel any better,” said Koehler."
Planned Parenthood has never been found to be in violation of the state disposal rules.
As an aside, some will wonder why a purple state such as Ohio, which has voted Democrat in the last two presidential elections, has such an overwhelmingly republican Senate and Legislature. Ohio is among the worst gerrymander offenders when it comes to 'drawing' legislative districts. Thus, nearly 70% of both state houses are republican.
Detractors argue that such a bill, if passed by the General Assembly and signed by Kasich in the fall, would place an undue burden on a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion. GOP leaders seem to have opted for alternative approaches to restricting abortion procedures after a fetal heartbeat bill was rebuffed by Gov. Kasich last year. Since, they have explored defunding Planned Parenthood and the Senate has now passed a bill requiring women to choose a disposal method for their aborted fetus before having the procedure done.
Fyi, the legal standard by which restrictions to abortion are measured is whether a state abortion regulation has the purpose or effect of imposing an "undue burden" on a woman's right to an abortion, which is defined as a "substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability." See PP v. Casey. The SCOTUS has found that a requirement of husband notification (not consent) violates this standard. Imo, this also violates the Casey standard and wouldn't survive SCOTUS review.
Thoughts?
Sources:
http://www.dispatch.com/content/sto...etal_remains_disposal_bill_passes_Senate.html
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/05/25/...renthood-dumping-aborted-babies-in-landfills/
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1991/91-744
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b42cd/b42cd93d14d85af6117cfb8525d0480e6ef08e38" alt="statehouse.jpg"
"Republican Representative Kyle Koehler says that discovery of what Planned Parenthood does with aborted babies moved him to sponsor legislation to require the burial or cremation of an aborted fetus.
“Somehow being able to tell my children that the reports of selling baby body parts are possibly not true because the actual truth is that they may be throwing them into Ohio landfills does not make me feel any better,” said Koehler."
Planned Parenthood has never been found to be in violation of the state disposal rules.
As an aside, some will wonder why a purple state such as Ohio, which has voted Democrat in the last two presidential elections, has such an overwhelmingly republican Senate and Legislature. Ohio is among the worst gerrymander offenders when it comes to 'drawing' legislative districts. Thus, nearly 70% of both state houses are republican.
Detractors argue that such a bill, if passed by the General Assembly and signed by Kasich in the fall, would place an undue burden on a woman's constitutional right to have an abortion. GOP leaders seem to have opted for alternative approaches to restricting abortion procedures after a fetal heartbeat bill was rebuffed by Gov. Kasich last year. Since, they have explored defunding Planned Parenthood and the Senate has now passed a bill requiring women to choose a disposal method for their aborted fetus before having the procedure done.
Fyi, the legal standard by which restrictions to abortion are measured is whether a state abortion regulation has the purpose or effect of imposing an "undue burden" on a woman's right to an abortion, which is defined as a "substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before the fetus attains viability." See PP v. Casey. The SCOTUS has found that a requirement of husband notification (not consent) violates this standard. Imo, this also violates the Casey standard and wouldn't survive SCOTUS review.
Thoughts?
Sources:
http://www.dispatch.com/content/sto...etal_remains_disposal_bill_passes_Senate.html
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/05/25/...renthood-dumping-aborted-babies-in-landfills/
https://www.oyez.org/cases/1991/91-744