Xbox Official Xbox thread

Usually setup like this if this helps anyone

HB_4x6_-_Back_large.jpg
 
Usually setup like this if this helps anyone

HB_4x6_-_Back_large.jpg
Why are the thumbs seemingly sharing duties for just one button while the left pinky is completely uninvolved? I guess it's because each thumb handles the other buttons to either side?
 
Usually setup like this if this helps anyone

HB_4x6_-_Back_large.jpg
Thanks for sharing but this isn't making me any less confused. I don't think I could use it either with my Shane Carwin sized hands. If the buttons on the right side were spaced out some more maybe I could understand it
 
Thanks for sharing but this isn't making me any less confused. I don't think I could use it either with my Shane Carwin sized hands. If the buttons on the right side were spaced out some more maybe I could understand it
Personally, I've never tried a hitbox but a lot of people swear by them. They look strange to me as well but if I ever get back into fighting games, I'm going to giver it a shot.
 
So, Xbox is putting their games on PlayStation. PlayStation is putting their games on Steam, which means you'll be able to play them on this handheld Xbox hardware. What a world.
img.php


Was just looking over the specifications today. It's going to be more powerful than the Series S in every way except (V)RAM bandwidth. The TFLOPS are actually superior to the base PS5. Crazy.

Looks like the base version and "X" version will be identical except the latter will have the neural processing units that come with the Z2 Extreme chip. I am skeptical it will be worth the rumored price increase. I don't recall seeing anything yet that suggests that AMD's FSR, even version 4.0, makes good use of NPU cores yet.

*Edit* Correction. The base version does not use the non-AI variant of the Z2 Extreme chipset. It uses a different chipset altogether: a refresh of the same chipset used in the Steam Deck. They also have different RAM amounts. The below GPU figures for the ASUS ROG Ally (base version) may be wrong. Here are Techpowerup's tentative figures for the chip putting it at the same performance as the Steam Deck despite being a refresh:

ConsoleNintendo Switch 2 (Portable)Steam Deck OLEDASUS ROG
Ally Xbox X
ASUS ROG
Ally Xbox
ASUS ROG
Ally X (2024)
ASUG ROG
Ally
Xbox
Series S
Display120Hz
LCD (IPS?)
120Hz
OLED
120Hz
Type?
120Hz
Type?
120Hz
IPS
120Hz
IPS
N/A
CPU Core/Thread Count8 / 84 / 88 / 164 / 88 / 166 / 128 / 16
CPU Frequency1.1 GHz3.5 GHz5.0 GHz3.8 GHz3.8 GHz4.9 GHz3.6 GHz (3.4GHz@16 threads)
CPU ArchitectureARM
v8.2
(Dec-2016)
AMD
Zen 2
(July-2019)
AMD
Zen 5
(Aug-2024)
AMD
Zen 5
(Aug-2024)
AMD
Zen 4
(Sep-2022)
AMD
Zen 4
(Sep-2022)
AMD
Zen 2
(July-2019)
Age of CPU Ark @launch102 months50 months~15 months?~15 months?22 months12 months16 months
Pixel Bandwidth13.525.6129.628.8 (?)86.420.050.1
Textel Bandwidth26.951.2172.857.6 (?)129.640.0125.2
TFLOPS1.721.6411.061.84 (?)8.292.564.01
VRAM Bandwidth68.388.0128.068.3 (?)102.4102.4224.0 (8GB)
56.0 (2GB)
(V)RAM Capacity12GB16GB24GB16GB24GB16GB10GB
GPU ArchitectureNVIDIA
Ampere
(May-2020)
AMD
RDNA 2.0
(Oct-2020)
AMD
RDNA 3.5
(May-2024)
AMD
RDNA 2.0
(Oct-2020)
AMD
RDNA 3.0
(Dec-2022)
AMD
RDNA 3.0
(Dec-2022)
AMD
RDNA 2.0
(Oct-2020)
Age of GPU Ark @launch61 months37 months~18 months?~61 months?19 months9 months1 month
Console ReleaseJun-2025Nov-2023Holidays 2025Holidays 2025July-2024Sep-2023Nov-2020
 
img.php


Was just looking over the specifications today. It's going to be more powerful than the Series S in every way except (V)RAM bandwidth. The TFLOPS are actually superior to the base PS5. Crazy.

Looks like the base version and "X" version will be identical except the latter will have the neural processing units that come with the Z2 Extreme chip. I am skeptical it will be worth the rumored price increase. I don't recall seeing anything yet that suggests that AMD's FSR, even version 4.0, makes good use of NPU cores yet.

ConsoleNintendo Switch 2 (Portable)Nintendo Switch (Portable)Steam Deck (OLED)ASUS ROG
Ally Xbox / X
ASUS ROG
Ally X (2024)
ASUG ROG
Ally
Xbox Series S
CPU Core/Thread Count8 / 84* / 44 / 88 / 168 / 166 / 128 / 16
CPU Frequency1.1 GHz1.02 GHz3.5 GHz5.0 GHz5.1 GHz4.9 GHz3.6 GHz (3.4GHz@16 threads)
CPU ArchitectureARMv8.2
(Dec-2016)
ARMv8.0
(Oct-2011)
AMD Zen 2
(July-2019)
AMD Zen 5
(Aug-2024)
AMD Zen 4
(Sep-2022)
AMD Zen 4
(Sep-2022)
AMD Zen 2
(July-2019)
Age of CPU Ark @launch102 months41 months31 months~15 months?22 months12 months16 months
Pixel Bandwidth13.512.325.6129.686.420.050.1
Textel Bandwidth26.912.351.2172.8129.640.0125.2
TFLOPS1.720.391.6411.068.292.564.01
VRAM Bandwidth68.325.688.0128.0102.4102.4224.0 (8GB)
56.0 (2GB)
(V)RAM Capacity12GB4GB16GB16GB / 24GB24GB16GB10GB
GPU ArchitectureNVIDIA
Ampere
(May-2020)
NVIDIA
Maxwell 2.0
(Sep-2014)
AMD
RDNA 2.0
(Oct-2020)
AMD
RDNA 3.5
(May-2024)
AMD
RDNA 3.0
(Dec-2022)
AMD
RDNA 3.0
(Dec-2022)
AMD
RDNA 2.0
(Oct-2020)
Age of GPU Ark @launch61 months30 months16 months~18 months?19 months9 months1 month
Console ReleaseJun-2025Mar-2017Feb-2022Holidays 2025July-2024Sep-2023Nov-2020

I'm really wondering what the price will be for this will be. I think we are looking at $900 easily. Asus recently increased the prices of all their devices.
 
Looks like the base version and "X" version will be identical except the latter will have the neural processing units that come with the Z2 Extreme chip. I am skeptical it will be worth the rumored price increase. I don't recall seeing anything yet that suggests that AMD's FSR, even version 4.0, makes good use of NPU cores yet.
The base version's chip is massively cut down, even without mentioning the NPU. The NPU screams classic Microsoft fuckery and is a headscratcher, higher production costs for no real benefits atm.
 
I'm really wondering what the price will be for this will be. I think we are looking at $900 easily. Asus recently increased the prices of all their devices.
I wouldnt be surprised if it hits 999 or even more. They were the slowest to shift production and are last in line with a lot of ODMs outside of China, so they've had real trouble hitting laptop volumes in the US.
 
The base version's chip is massively cut down, even without mentioning the NPU. The NPU screams classic Microsoft fuckery and is a headscratcher, higher production costs for no real benefits atm.
Please link me the report specifying what the cut down pipelines will be, then, because I'll have to revise my above table to account for it.

*Edit*
Okay, I took the time to find it myself. It's not a cut down version of the same chip. It's a different chipset altogether. I'll crunch the numbers and add a new column. I had to kick the original Switch which is fine, as it is a generation back, and shouldn't be compared to these in the first place.

Under the hood, the black edition of the Ally 2 represents ASUS's most ambitious handheld to date. It employs AMD's Ryzen Z2 Extreme processor, an eight‑core chip rated at 36 W, paired with 64 GB of LPDDR5X‑8533 memory. In contrast, the white model will feature AMD's Aeirth Plus APU with four cores operating at 20 W.
For those who don't know, AERITH is the codename for the System-on-Chip used in Steam Deck. It is powered by Zen 2 architecture and features 4 cores and 8 threads. The AERITH Plus looks to be the successor to the AERITH and, as per the record, it brings noticeably higher clocks and an increase in TDP.

*Edit #2*
Oddly, I believe I found the chipset on Techpowerup, but their numbers appear to be all wrong. The issue is they are showing the wrong TDP compared to what we're seeing in reports elsewhere, like those I linked above, unless ASUS will deliberately nerf the refreshed variant of the chipset to a TDP below what Steam itself uses in the older & more primitive version of the chipset; they're not showing the increased GPU frequency; finally, their memory transfer rate also doesn't reflect the newer chipset's reported improvements. So just bear in mind that everything in my chart above is subject to future correction.
 
Last edited:
Please link me the report specifying what the cut down pipelines will be, then, because I'll have to revise my above table to account for it.
These are the specs of the device, it's an IPS display (shared by both models). Aside from the chip, main differences are Ally X gets haptic triggers, a substantially larger battery, and faster RAM too.

You're correction is correct, not the same chip. (I meant figuratively cut down)
The issue is they are showing the wrong TDP compared to what we're seeing in reports elsewhere, like those I linked above, unless ASUS will deliberately nerf the refreshed variant of the chipset to a TDP below what Steam itself uses in the older & more primitive version of the chipset; they're not showing the increased GPU frequency; finally, their memory transfer rate also doesn't reflect the newer chipset's reported improvements. So just bear in mind that everything in my chart above is subject to future correction.
Techpowerup isn't wrong for TDP, it's 6-20W, we'll see what Asus ships in as the max. Cache is wrong though, as are frequencies.
 
These are the specs of the device, it's an IPS display (shared by both models). Aside from the chip, main differences are Ally X gets haptic triggers, a substantially larger battery, and faster RAM too.

You're correction is correct, not the same chip. (I meant figuratively cut down)
Goddamit, that link with the press report was the first one I read. I just ended up on the wrong page for the Z2A.
Techpowerup isn't wrong for TDP, it's 6-20W, we'll see what Asus ships in as the max. Cache is wrong though, as are frequencies.
You're confused, you're comparing different chips. That Techpowerup link I provided was for the chip they believed it was going to be from the older, inaccurate reports I linked: the much older Aerith Plus, not the Ryzen Z2A. My confusion stemmed from the Techpowerup spec sheet for that Aerith Plus. None of its figures make sense in light of their own reports (ex. 20W TDP) or others that were pointing to the presumed implementation of that Aerith Plus chip (i.e. 1800MHz GPU boost clock).

This is all irrelevant, now. This custom implementation of the Aerith Plus clearly won't exist.

*Edit* Holy God, I'm too tired for this. So the Z2A is the Aerith Plus on the GPU side of the APU. And yeah, because of that, my original confusion stands. Those numbers don't make sense unless ASUS is deliberately nerfing the power and frequencies of the refresh of the chip. If Techpowerup is correct, then it suggests ASUS will deliberately downthrottle the chip to maintain the same performance as the Steam Deck in terms of GPU performance, but at a lower power draw.
 
Last edited:
You're confused, you're comparing different chips. That Techpowerup link I provided was for the chip they believed it was going to be from the older, inaccurate reports I linked: the much older Aerith Plus, not the Ryzen Z2A. My confusion stemmed from the Techpowerup spec sheet for that Aerith Plus. None of its figures make sense in light of their own reports (ex. 20W TDP) or others that were pointing to the presumed implementation of that Aerith Plus chip (i.e. 1800MHz GPU boost clock).

This is all irrelevant, now. This custom implementation of the Aerith Plus clearly won't exist.

*Edit* Holy God, I'm too tired for this. So the Z2A is the Aerith Plus on the GPU side of the APU. And yeah, because of that, my original confusion stands. Those numbers don't make sense unless ASUS is deliberately nerfing the power and frequencies of the refresh of the chip. If Techpowerup is correct, then it suggests ASUS will deliberately downthrottle the chip to maintain the same performance as the Steam Deck in terms of GPU performance, but at a lower power draw.
I'd really only take stats from AMD or Asus now unless someone is dying to speculate for fun (more power to em). Asus may or may not undervolt the SoC, who knows. I'm pretty sure the top feedback Ally PMs would have got would be longer battery life, not more power.
 
So, Xbox is putting their games on PlayStation. PlayStation is putting their games on Steam, which means you'll be able to play them on this handheld Xbox hardware. What a world.

One factor flew under the radar. Valve partnered with and is funding Arch Linux development.

So Valve has seen something behind the scenes from other players that they still dont like.
 
Are people really saying near 1k for this thing? Would that not make it dead on arrival?
 
Back
Top