- Joined
- Jul 22, 2016
- Messages
- 15,445
- Reaction score
- 5,623
I'll do the whole list for you:]/quote]
Not what he asked you. Dishonest, again.
Nunes, prefers her fw fights, has noticeable cardio issues in bw fights.
Yes, her cardio was horrible against Pena . . . oh, wait, no. Was fine against Shevchenko for five rounds as well. Not only is this not what was asked, it is not entirely true.
Pena, she been perfect at bw.
Viera, missed bw.
Holm, fights at fw.
Aldana, 2x missed bw, has had five fights at catchweight with some of her best performances.
Pennington, missed weight, also takes fw fights.
Kunitskaya, missed bw, takes fw and even lw fights before.
Ladd, you know.
McMann, perfect bw, and she left the ufc to probably fight in a different weightclass.
Chiasson, 2x missed bw, has cardio issues at BW too, takes fw fights.
Kainzad, 2x missed bw (maybe as many as 4x), takes fw fights.
Rosa, possibly missed before, takes fw fights, has had cardio issues at bw.
Lansberg, possibly missed before, takes fw fights.
Avila, perfect bw.
Dumont, NEVER made bw in the UFC or pretty much her career takes fw fights
So we have 3 women in the UFC rankings including Mcmann who might not resign, pena, and Avila on mat leave.
Unranked:
Stoliarenko, missed bw before, fights at fw.
Edwards, missed bw, fights at fw.
Pascaul, chandler, egger, Letson, Perez, j Nunes all been fighting at fw.
Again nearly EVERYONE has missed or has been fightingat fw.
Just going to summarized because going through line by line and presenting how you are dishonest is just more time than you are worth. Because someone takes fights at featherweight does not support your claim that they consistently missed weight at 135. Having missed does not mean "consistently missed" but you keep backpedalling and moving the goal posts in addition to creating straw-man arguments because you lack the integrity to admit that you anonymously made a mistake online.
Grow up. Or at least just stop. You do not just get to post bullshit and have everyone accept it.
Allow me to help:
In order to support "the majority of women's bantamweights consistently miss weight" you must show that 51% of the division misses weight at least 51% of the time. This should not be that hard if it is true.
If you cannot . . . . then you were just wrong. Using all capitals does not make you any less wrong. Thank you for coming to my TED talk.