- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 25,527
- Reaction score
- 13,516
I'm not defending the likes of Cortez or the Spanish conquistadors, but it was a savage and brutal period of history. We shouldnt kid ourselves about the people that were conquered. They were far less civilized, they kept slaves, did human sacrifice, they ate the dead, etc. Comanches, and Aztecs have a particularly cruel history.
All these people up in arms now claiming to be offended, saying their people were conquered is a joke. I'd bet dollars to doughnuts they have far more Spanish DNA than "indigenous" DNA.
Like this twat here:
Trying to claim he's a product from a city 300 years ago and not the product of the colonization.
First of all we know very little (next to nothing) about the pre Columbian Indians in the Americas, because the Europeans essentially killed them all and erased most of their cultural existence from history (purposely to convert them to a separate fairy tale creator story). What we do know about them comes from the Europeans, which is likely to be a bit of a biased and rather incomplete account of their civilization and culture.
They were just another set of human civilization, suggesting they were worse or behaved worse than the Europeans is ignorant of what we know about them.
These people had been living there in North and South America since well back into the depths of the ice age. They were masters of agriculture in an environment that is almost immune to crops naturally (at least in the Amazon Basin) and had a highly sophisticated understanding of math.
I'm not a supporter of historically relevant statues being vandalized. At all.
Last edited: