- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,458
- Reaction score
- 768
What is Trump getting charged with?
OBSTRUCTION OF INJUSTICE!
HOW DARE TRUMP PREVENT THE DEMOCRATS FROM HAVING HILLARY WIN IN 2016!!





What is Trump getting charged with?
This is true. Two kids at my highschool got in a shootout over a hat and one killed the other. He then went to his cousin and his cousin hid the gun. The guy who killed the other kid got off on self defense, but the cousin got charged and convicted of obstruction of justice.After hearing multiple experts point out you can be guilty of obstruction of justice even if not charged for the underlying crime (see Martha Stewart), I can safely conclude you got your law degree from a Cracker Jack box.
What Straws am I grasping at, i already posted what you just stated two pages back, you dork. I even added "no collusion (except by Crooked Hilary and the dems!) to the post.True but you can’t convict someone of obstruction, for example, if there was no crime to obstruct against.
You and all the libs are now left grasping at straws here.
It's over, Johnny.
I love how the OP took away all of daddys lil cucks shit tier talking points.
![]()
That was James Comey's letter being released 11 days before the election that gave the WH to Trump.OBSTRUCTION OF INJUSTICE!
HOW DARE TRUMP PREVENT THE DEMOCRATS FROM HAVING HILLARY WIN IN 2016!!![]()
Just want to re-visit the statement :
"The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’
lol this gif is from here in Raleigh.
Naw you are just too dumb to understand what you read.
The legal threshold to convict is very high. Particularly when a Prosecutor cannot compel the POTUS to answer questions or indict him.
IS anyone dumb enough to think Al Capone did not commit mob crimes? NO. Well maybe some of the dumbest people in this thread would say so. But still they could not convict him, despite lots of evidence. They had to get him for tax crimes. That does not mean it was PROVEN he did not do mob crimes because they could not prosecute and convict him.
I want the dumbest of you to read that last paragraph 5 times just so you understand what point it is making and that point is just because they cannot prosecute or convict you does not mean you are innocent.
And that is clearly what Mueller (not Barr) says. And until we see how close Mueller got to thinking he had enough to indict and pursue this argument will remain partisan circle jerks.
This is true. Two kids at my highschool got in a shootout over a hat and one killed the other. He then went to his cousin and his cousin hid the gun. The guy who killed the other kid got off on self defense, but the cousin got charged and convicted of obstruction of justice.
Whatever helps you sleepI believe the key is the use of the word "knowingly". I think Honorable Mueller couldn't tell if there was collusion beyond a reasonable doubt or if Trump and associates were just too damn stupid and were unknowing foreign agents. This is probably why no charges were filed. Hard to distinguish if they were corrupt or stupid.
That was James Comey's letter being released 11 days before the election that gave the WH to Trump.
This doesn't make sense to me.
Grasping at straws? I'm correcting your error.
No, because he's an amoral, lying, narcissist.
The polls that show Hillary's numbers dipping after the release of the Comey letter, the fact that about 70% of the voters who made up their minds in the last 2 weeks before the election voted Trump.It did? You have a source for that?
The polls that show Hillary's numbers dipping after the release of the Comey letter, the fact that about 70% of the voters who made up their minds in the last 2 weeks before the election voted Trump.
MY ERROR?
The AG said that, because you can’t exonerate someone who was not convicted of a crime. That said the usage of exoneration is wrong in both cases which also makes you wrong as the parroter of wrong information...