- Joined
- Aug 19, 2006
- Messages
- 6,239
- Reaction score
- 1,437
What will media do from now on?
What will media do from now on?
BREAKING NEWS: SPECIAL COUNCIL DID NOT FIND TRUMP CAMPAIGN OR ASSOCIATES CONSPIRED WITH RUSSIA
Is that plain fucking English direct enough for you Libbies?
What will media do from now on?
If the media was so evil, they had more than enough video highlights to make a really nasty hit piece TV special to run 24/7 and make Humpty Dumpty totally crack.What will media do from now on?
I'm in the same spot as you. Trump is a turd, but the left is just total shit.I'm in a unique position in that I both hate Trump but also hate the modern left. That said, I didn't for one second believe there was any collusion with Russia. It absolutely blows my mind that people waited excitedly for two years for this turd. CNN should be put in timeout for pushing this bullshit so aggressively.
I want you guys to be better poster. Smarter posters.
if you think there was anything new in that press release that we did not know I will ask you to explain what?
Were Trumpsters stupid to think after hearing there would be no more indictments from Mueller that the announcement would be "Mueller had sufficient evidence to prosecute but simple choose not to, to be nice to POTUS'???
I mean, I guess you guys could be that stupid that you were actually think Mueller DID find enough evidence to prosecute and simply choose not to, but no one with a brain thought that.
Mueller did not exonerate Trump on these key issues. And we will all, hopefully, one day see all the key info as to what exactly Trump and Co did and did not do. You can do a lot that is bad, wrong and damming that is not necessarily prosecutable.
the better question is, what will dems do now? They lost their main political agendaWhat will media do from now on?
Mueller not finding anything is worse from Trump than him finding something? Dude I honestly think you need to get some some mental health care or something.@HereticBD is headline hunting as if we wont see partisan cherry picking headlines from now until the report is released.
Ya we already knew Mueller did not find what he needed to charge.
This actually looks worse for Trump than better as many were suggesting that was because there was nothing there.
This shows Mueller simply could not get to a point of legal sufficiency which is a much higher bar than the proof needed for opinion or political matters.
If the media was so evil, they had more than enough video highlights to make a really nasty hit piece TV special to run 24/7 and make Humpty Dumpty totally crack.
lol You looking up the meaning of a word on wikipedia thinking an attorney like Mueller doesn't know how the word actually applies legally?Just want to re-visit the statement :
"The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’
Exoneration occurs when the conviction for a crime is reversed, either through demonstration of innocence, a flaw in the conviction, or otherwise. (per wikipedia)
Trump hasn't been convicted of anything, has he?
So Mueller is full of shit in that regard and Barr is just "playing along" humoring that viewpoint so as not to appear to show favoritism toward Trump.
I can imagine Barr rolling his eyes to the heavens when he saw what Mueller concluded. lol
Just want to re-visit the statement :
"The Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’
Exoneration occurs when the conviction for a crime is reversed, either through demonstration of innocence, a flaw in the conviction, or otherwise. (per wikipedia)
Trump hasn't been convicted of anything, has he?
So Mueller is full of shit in that regard and Barr is just "playing along" humoring that viewpoint so as not to appear to show favoritism toward Trump.
I can imagine Barr rolling his eyes to the heavens when he saw what Mueller concluded. lol
Can't obstruct justice for a crime that was never committed.
![]()
that statement was completely insane.Mueller not finding anything is worse from Trump than him finding something? Dude I honestly think you need to get some some mental health care or something.
Who said Mueller missed something? I think once they get the info from the report that'll be that.Yeah. Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler will get to the bottom of what Mueller missed with two years, 2,800 subpoenas and 500 witness interviews.
![]()
I want you guys to be better poster. Smarter posters.
if you think there was anything new in that press release that we did not know I will ask you to explain what?
Were Trumpsters stupid to think after hearing there would be no more indictments from Mueller that the announcement would be "Mueller had sufficient evidence to prosecute but simple choose not to, to be nice to POTUS'???
I mean, I guess you guys could be that stupid that you were actually think Mueller DID find enough evidence to prosecute and simply choose not to, but no one with a brain thought that.
Mueller did not exonerate Trump on these key issues. And we will all, hopefully, one day see all the key info as to what exactly Trump and Co did and did not do. You can do a lot that is bad, wrong and damming that is not necessarily prosecutable.