Not Showtime yet: Report emBARRgoed (SCO Thread v. 30)

[ObamaPhoneLady]

The Republicans spent well over 20 years trying to get something on Hillary Clinton and got nothing.

Good for president Hillary.

Oh wait...

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

Obstruction of justice decision was made by AG not by Mueller.

Prior to AG confirmation, he was noted to say pres cannot obstruct justice.

Can't obstruct justice for a crime that was never committed.

 

[JamesRussler]

“I’m sorry. You were right all along, I was completely wrong. I should not have doubted you. I will try to learn from my mistakes so that it won’t happen again.”

—No Liberal, Ever​

 

[MikeMcMann]

I think this is more accurate than what you said. But innocent until proven guilty, so NO COLLUSION! (except by Crooked Hilary and the Dems)

Special counsel did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute obstruction, but does not exonerate Trump



Attorney General William Barr and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein decided the evidence was “not sufficient” to support a prosecution of the President for obstruction of justice.

“While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him,” Barr quotes special counsel Robert Mueller as saying.

@HereticBD is headline hunting as if we wont see partisan cherry picking headlines from now until the report is released.

Ya we already knew Mueller did not find what he needed to charge.

This actually looks worse for Trump than better as many were suggesting that was because there was nothing there.

This shows Mueller simply could not get to a point of legal sufficiency which is a much higher bar than the proof needed for opinion or political matters.

 

[Bloody Pulp]

@HereticBD is headline hunting as if we wont see partisan cherry picking headlines from now until the report is released.

Ya we already knew Mueller did not find what he needed to charge.

This actually looks worse for Trump than better as many were suggesting that was because there was nothing there.

This shows Mueller simply could not get to a point of legal sufficiency which is a much higher bar than the proof needed for opinion or political matters.

 

[Factory]

One of those conclusions: “The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election.”

Sounds like a complete vindication to me.

 

[unimackpass]

I’d say a great portion of Trumps movement was distaste for the Bush Republicans. The John McCains. The neoconservatives/internationalists of the Bush era who are undoubtedly dying out and being replaced by a different movement. His attack and the undressing of the Republican field in the primaries, especially guys like Jeb!, Rubio, and Kasich was almost as bad as what Clinton got. When they got out next to Trump and then you got somebody like Bernie Sanders on the other side it really exposed how little difference there is between establishment republicans and democrats. Trump for practical purposes had to play a little bit of the game with how the system is set up to prevent wrecking ball politicians but he is still pretty much the antithesis of how we come to know establishment politicians and has for the most part stuck to his guns despite a few disappointments

Extremely well thought out and articulated post.
What's interesting is that over the years Trump was paying attention to what was going on and how to maneuver inside the arena.
There are many advantages of not being involved in politics until the right moment.
Most still don't know what's happening and are continuing to be played even after this recent massive failure.
Their attention is on the wrong part of the game. The dems and MSM have directing their focus and controlling their thoughts.

 

[GSP_37]

If the NBC Lester Holt interview wasn't the clearest proof of corrupt intent to obstruct justice, what is???

 

[mbinder]

The Republicans spent well over 20 years trying to get something on Hillary Clinton and got nothing.

That may be. But their investigations didn't exclusively stem out of the fact that they were buttburt she won the presidential election against all odds.

This one did.

 

[JamesRussler]

@HereticBD is headline hunting as if we wont see partisan cherry picking headlines from now until the report is released.

Ya we already knew Mueller did not find what he needed to charge.

This actually looks worse for Trump than better as many were suggesting that was because there was nothing there.

This shows Mueller simply could not get to a point of legal sufficiency which is a much higher bar than the proof needed for opinion or political matters.

 

[Factory]

@HereticBD is headline hunting as if we wont see partisan cherry picking headlines from now until the report is released.

Ya we already knew Mueller did not find what he needed to charge.

This actually looks worse for Trump than better as many were suggesting that was because there was nothing there.

This shows Mueller simply could not get to a point of legal sufficiency which is a much higher bar than the proof needed for opinion or political matters.

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

This actually looks worse for Trump.

Lmao

 

[glenwo2]

Can't obstruct justice for a crime that was never committed.

HOLY.

FUCKING.

SHIT.

THAT IS AMAZING!!

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

If the NBC Lester Holt interview wasn't the clearest proof of corrupt intent to obstruct justice, what is???

How do you obstruct justice for a crime that was never committed?

 

[MikeMcMann]

I want you guys to be better poster. Smarter posters.

if you think there was anything new in that press release that we did not know I will ask you to explain what?

Were Trumpsters stupid to think after hearing there would be no more indictments from Mueller that the announcement would be "Mueller had sufficient evidence to prosecute but simple choose not to, to be nice to POTUS'???


I mean, I guess you guys could be that stupid that you were actually think Mueller DID find enough evidence to prosecute and simply choose not to, but no one with a brain thought that.

Mueller did not exonerate Trump on these key issues. And we will all, hopefully, one day see all the key info as to what exactly Trump and Co did and did not do. You can do a lot that is bad, wrong and damming that is not necessarily prosecutable.

 

[Contra-dictator]

Really embarrassing for democrats

 

[bobgeese]

@HereticBD is headline hunting as if we wont see partisan cherry picking headlines from now until the report is released.

Ya we already knew Mueller did not find what he needed to charge.

This actually looks worse for Trump than better as many were suggesting that was because there was nothing there.

This shows Mueller simply could not get to a point of legal sufficiency which is a much higher bar than the proof needed for opinion or political matters.

 

[Contra-dictator]

How do you obstruct justice for a crime that was never committed?

Exactly! This is better than 2016!

 

[Contra-dictator]

Manual like!

 

[GSP_37]

How do you obstruct justice for a crime that was never committed?

Having enough cronies lie apparently obstructed enough justice where proof beyond a reasonable doubt could not be obtained. Why have such a huge effort to lie if nothing to hide?