Not Showtime yet: Report emBARRgoed (SCO Thread v. 30)

[HereticBD]

<Lmaoo>

 

[ocean size]

That's all spin you guys fell for. The Trump tower meeting was about opposition research,

Just taking oppo research would have been a campaign contribution from a foreign government and thus a violation. As the emails were in play from the russian govt too, something far more illegal could have been there as well.

nothing wrong with talking to Kislyak,

Actually there was, it was a potential Logan act violation and undercutting the actions of the then executive if he was discussing sanctions. If nothing was wrong with it, he wouldn't have basically knowingly perjured himself, opening himself up to doing time.

nothing wrong with being in contact with wikileaks,

Again without knowing details, there certainly could be something wrong with acting as a conduit between wikilinks and the campaign, and again Stone decided he was better off committing perjury.

Manafort was only around for a few weeks then fired,

If I hire a hooker for only 12 minutes does it mean I wasn't soliciting?

and nothing wrong with firing Comey for mishandling and misrepresenting the Russia investigation.

Really depends, unless you know better than Mueller: that this is "‘difficult issues’ of law and fact concerning whether the president’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.” Now, if that is after the investigation ended, I'd say that there was ground for investigating in the first place.

In terms of all of the typical conservative counterpoints you brought up, some of which are debunked, lets investigate them! Anyone that acted illegally should be dealt with appropriately. But what exactly would your standard be to accept that the investigation was warranted?

 

[andnowweknow]

You say this after spending two years propagating Russian conspiracy. You should be busy eating piles and piles of crow not posting on Sherdog.

By "you" you mean someone else...and let's actually see the report. Barr literally said what he said in the letter today months before.

Mueller is by definition non partisan. Barr is a member of Trump's cabinet.

This will be easy, if they fight to not release the report, everyone should sit on their hands because Barr just made himself arbiter, implying Mueller did.

 

[Sketch]

<Lmaoo><45><45><45><45>

 

[SRN]

 

[ocean size]

lol this shitposting victory lap is hilarious.

I'll retire until the details are out and we find out what exactly are Mueller's "‘difficult issues’ of law and fact concerning whether the president’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.” since its unclear if Barr will spill the beans.

 

[Farmer Br0wn]

If President Trump or his family was guilty of some tax code violation or lying to investigators, they would have already been charged with it.

The evidence:

Muller has charged people with tax code violations and lying to investigators.

It's over.

A win for the good guys!

 

[andnowweknow]

will be interesting to see when exactly Barr decides to talk to and consult Mueller?

that was me joking, he skipped that part.

 

[andnowweknow]

lol this shitposting victory lap is hilarious.

I'll retire until the details are out and we find out what exactly are Mueller's "‘difficult issues’ of law and fact concerning whether the president’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.” since its unclear if Barr will spill the beans.

they'll all be gone then, predictably. Don't be that way, stay here and shitpost back!

 

[TheBlondBomber]

So now is the Russia/Trump Collusion conspiracy theory on the same level of craziness as lizard people Illuminati conspiracies or is it closer to Pizzagate conspiracies?

Edit: I forgot. Pizzagate is actually true.

 

[HereticBD]

lol this shitposting victory lap is hilarious.

I'll retire until the details are out and we find out what exactly are Mueller's "‘difficult issues’ of law and fact concerning whether the president’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction.” since its unclear if Barr will spill the beans.

Here's a difficult issue. How does one obstruct justice of a non-crime?

 

[SRN]

So now is the Russia/Trump Collusion conspiracy theory on the same level of craziness as lizard people Illuminati conspiracies or is it closer to Pizzagate conspiracies?

Edit: I forgot. Pizzagate is actually true.

Since none of the other two went full mainstream all over the globe I think it's fair to say there's no comparison. The "collusion" bs takes the price here.

 

[Bloody Pulp]

Here's a difficult issue. How does one obstruct justice of a non-crime?

Like so.

Sherdog libs - Jim Comey said Drumpf robbed a bank and killed a guy and then Drumpf fired him! That’s obstruction of justice!

Sane person - The bank wasn’t robbed and no one was killed...

Sherdog libs - it doesn’t matter! He obstructed the investigation! Impeach 45!

 

[computer fogie]

...Pizzagate is actually true.

You post a tweet by Jack Posobiec, then this.

It's good to see people here who have their head on straight. Cheers.

 

[andnowweknow]

Here's a difficult issue. How does one obstruct justice of a non-crime?

I'll take this as a serious question regardless of the validity of that. As a logic exercise, if you do not commit a crime, are accused of one, and you intervene to prevent said investigation into your supposed crime...that's obstruction of justice. Those investigating crimes don't allow meddling in their investigations regardless of that investigations conclusions.

 

[HereticBD]

Since none of the other two went full mainstream all over the globe I think it's fair to say there's no comparison. The "collusion" bs takes the price here.

...and they're warming up for the sequel.

"We need an investigation into the official report"


I repeat, how embarrassing. It's like the Dems want to lose 2020. This is insanity.

 

[glenwo2]

 

[TheBlondBomber]

You post a tweet by Jack Posobiec, then this.

It's good to see people here who have their head on straight. Cheers.

Ahh. Here’s a good barometer to determine if you have your head on straight.

Was there collusion between Trump and Russia? A yes or no answer will do.

 

[waiguoren]

Ahh. Here’s a good barometer to determine if you have your head on straight.

Was there collusion between Trump and Russia? A yes or no answer will do.

@computer fogie right now:

 

[HereticBD]

Was there collusion between Trump and Russia? A yes or no answer will do.

We just won't ever know, without no less than fifteen more investigations. I mean how can we really be sure? Right?