Just checking in to the thread as I’ve long since disregarded the investigation. Someone bring me up to speed, is this it yet?
Do you want to see what it says?
That's not what "sour grapes" means.The sour grapes over a lost election was still quite fresh in the minds of most of those posters. It was like reading the thread of fans of a football team that had just lost, and the fans of that team we're still trying to do everything they could to push their team over the top.
It 100% does notThat video needs to be reposted about 500 times in this thread.
I think you’ve tried explaining this to him before.That's not what "sour grapes" means.
Sour grapes is the rationalization of failure, not the lack of acceptance. As in, "had I gotten the grapes, they would have been sour anyway."
An example of sour grapes from 2016 would be people who were upset that Trump won, but who rationalized by saying that Hillary would have been worse. We had quite a few of those in here.
Farmers are often a bit slow.I think you’ve tried explaining this to him before.
c'mon, at least give us some tweets from someone somebody has heard of. Gimme something from Donny.
lmao'd when I got that 'like' tag
Enjoy it while it lasts! Drumpf/tRUmp is going down.to all the people in here taking a victory lap:
enjoy it while it lasts![]()
That's not what "sour grapes" means.
Sour grapes is the rationalization of failure, not the lack of acceptance. As in, "had I gotten the grapes, they would have been sour anyway."
An example of sour grapes from 2016 would be people who were upset that Trump won, but who rationalized by saying that Hillary would have been worse. We had quite a few of those in here.
I think you’ve tried explaining this to him before.
Their rationalizations for failure was a grip of sour grapes......
Also, the Cambridge dictionary agrees with my usage:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/sour-grapes
It was a nice try...
Cambridge Dictionary has folded to the sheer volume of illiterate cretins, unfortunately. They are factually wrong. Aesop is the source.
Ya its a bunch of garbage. I watched it when this was said over and over and no such thing exists.I think people are seeing what they want to see there. What I saw was she looked off guard and unprepared. She was also called off a fishing trip and rushed to the studio. Certainly nothing like crying. Childish stuff from you and others.
Point in fact. Please time stamp the voice cracking like someone speaking at a funeral?Does her voice usually crack like someone speaking at a funeral?
Even if you aren’t willing to accept the obvious, can you at least admit that it is a completely inappropriate response to finding out that not a single American was charged for anything related to Russia?
You’d think people would be happy. Then again, they actually hate America, so...
Cambridge Dictionary has folded to the sheer volume of illiterate cretins, unfortunately. They are factually wrong. Aesop is the source.
Take it to the lounge you slutsThis is what doubling-down looks like:
You (Fawlty) hold an opinion.
An official Source (the Cambridge dictionary) contradicts your opinion.
You say the official source is somehow wrong rather than accept the possibility that you're wrong.
This is a teachable moment for you Fawlty.
Take it to the lounge you sluts