...but a business man turned reality TV star should?![]()
I think the problem is in thinking generals should shape geo-political policy.
They are experts of military tactics, not political scientists.
This deflection is sad.....Wait. Who called who a little bitch?
My account in your hands? Lol. Homer is back! You have crave on speed dial
BTW. I stopped reading the rest of your post after you threatened my account. I say hit that report button so the MODS can see who called who a little bitch and made up threats
Are you personally attacking a poster in hopes of reporting their counter attacks? There was another poster who was banned for doing that same shit. I'm sure he thought he had the MODS fooled also up until the moment the hammer came down
Don Lemon with some real talk.
Here’s how rough this is.I don't know.
When Mattis was announced for this position, the people with more experience than me (left and right) said this was a great appointment because of Mattis' skills, knowledge and character.
When Mattis announced his resignation, he made clear it's because the administration is taking a very different approach to our alliances than he thinks we should and he can't be a part of that. A man praised for his skills, knowledge and character thinks we're taking the wrong direction.
On one hand, it's good for the Sec. of Defense to align with the WH on foreign policy direction. On the other hand it's extremely bad when the person who was considered extremely credible for the position says the administration is taking the wrong direction to such a degree that he can't continue to participate.
People need to stop shifting things into "bagging on the POTUS" vs. "not bagging on the POTUS". Sometimes people are doing a bad job. Blindly defending them is just as bad as blindly attacking them. Once you get past the rhetoric, you have to start measuring what is actually being done.
You can agree with reducing illegal immigration and still have a problem with unconstitutional means of doing so. You can think taxes are too high and still have a problem with ballooning the deficit to pay for tax cuts. You can think border security is a good idea and still think $5B for a wall is a waste and that a wall is not a good reason for a government shutdown.
Good intentions mixed with bad implementation is still a shitty job.

This deflection is sad.....
“I have no meaningful way to respond.... I’ll just talk about reporting him when I’m actually the one posting personal info!!!!”
You’re like Kim Jong Un.... holding the gun to your own head threatening to pull the trigger if you don’t get what you want.
commander and chief should, yes.
Serious, dude?the commander and chief
well nobody likes a traitorThis is the thread where liberals are now pro-war.
It is sad really. Obama in 2008 ran on bringing the troops home. If there was anything that liberals should find in common with Trump is was) ending the wars. Now their hate for him just overrides any sensibility.
That stuff is more important. Mattis needed to go.
There is something I don't get from Mattis' letter.In his resignation letter, Mattis drew a clear distinction between himself and the president. "My views on treating allies with respect and also being clear-eyed about both malign actors and strategic competitors are strongly held," he wrote.
MIDDLE EAST
How Is The World Reacting To Trump's Decision To Withdraw From Syria?
"Because you have the right to have a Secretary of Defense whose views are better aligned with yours on these and other subjects, I believe it is right for me to step down from my position."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/de...s-to-retire-at-the-end-of-february-trump-says
![]()
Right there at the top of the page under "Hot Topics." The House Spending Bill was obviously going to take the front page for most of the day.
Also, file your post under “Shit Farmer Brown says, that never actually happened.”
No. It's impossible for Trump to be right here.....Because he has Bolton in his cabinet. Any war opposed by Trump is a good War!
Signed, Fawlty
I don't know what you're talking about here but I just wanted to say that I like, and will probably steal the term "low resolution thinking"!Are you actually asserting that you don't believe that I made a joke with my brother?
This is one of the best examples of low resolution thinking I've seen in some time.
You have full confidence in something you have no way of knowing. You're claiming to have intimate personal knowledge of a conversation between two people that you don't know and have never met.
That's bordering on derangement.
LOL! Threaten you? What the fuck are you talking about? Are you drunk Again?
Tiny little bitch? Are you for real? We've seen you dummy. What? 5'6' absolutely no muscle tone. Bald with saggy tits, noodle arms and an almost pregnant look in the midsection
I'd never even fight you. It would look like a man fighting a pregnant extraterrestrial. I'd just hold you down as gently as possible until the authorities arrived. I'd also contain you while they argued which facility to take you to. Male or Female



I don't know what you're talking about here but I just wanted to say that I like, and will probably steal the term "low resolution thinking"!