International No apology from Britain's state broadcaster after it promoted the 'music' of child killer who brags about the killing in his songs

I don't think I would have fucked a 14 year old in any era dude. It's disgusting.
That was not my question.



On a side note, the guy in your avatar worships a guy who fucked a 9 year old.
 
That was not my question.



On a side note, the guy in your avatar worships a guy who fucked a 9 year old.

Idk dude it seems like you're a Led Zeppelin fan who is not enjoying learning that Jimmy Page is a raging nonce.
 
Idk dude it seems like you're a Led Zeppelin fan who is not enjoying learning that Jimmy Page is a raging nonce.
I like Led Zeppelin's music, I'm not attached to their personal lives in any way and don't really give a shit since as you said, it was pretty much the norm at the time.

Now can you answer my question.

IF a speed limit on a street is 100 km/h in 1970, and you drove 100 on that street in 1970, and that street has now been changed to a maximum 40 zone, ARE YOU GUILTY OF SPEEDING because you drove 100 on it back when it was allowed?

It's a yes or no question.
 
I like Led Zeppelin's music, I'm not attached to their personal lives in any way and don't really give a shit since as you said, it was pretty much the norm at the time.

Now can you answer my question.

IF a speed limit on a street is 100 km/h in 1970, and you drove 100 on that street in 1970, and that street has now been changed to a maximum 40 zone, ARE YOU GUILTY OF SPEEDING because you drove 100 on it back when it was allowed?

It's a yes or no question.

I can't believe you're trying to compare speeding to fucking children.

Jesus Christ dude.
 
I can't believe you're trying to compare speeding to fucking children.

Jesus Christ dude.
Nice dicktuck, every time I think you might be an honest player you show your cowardice.

Let me put it another way, if in the year 2100 society decides that you're not an adult at 18, what if in that year everyone decides that one only becomes and adult at 25 years old (not all that absurd considering we know that the pre frontal cortex is not fully developed until around our mid 20's), are we then all :eek::eek::eek::eek:s if we had intercourse with anyone under 25 in this time period?
 
Nice dicktuck, every time I think you might be an honest player you show your cowardice.

Let me put it another way, if in the year 2100 society decides that you're not an adult at 18, what if in that year everyone decides that one only becomes and adult at 25 years old (not all that absurd considering we know that the pre frontal cortex is not fully developed until around our mid 20's), are we then all :eek::eek::eek::eek:s if we had intercourse with anyone under 25 in this time period?

No because there's a big difference in development between an 18 year old and a 14 year old.
 
No because there's a big difference in development between an 18 year old and a 14 year old.
Because that's what TODAY'S societal norms tell you.

But can you not appreciate that a hundred years from now society might look at your stance as sick and outdated?

Have you ever read any history books?

You know that thing called slavery that we all now see as evil and repugnant? Well a few centuries ago this was just business as usual and no one had much issue with it.
 
Because that's what TODAY'S societal norms tell you.

But can you not appreciate that a hundred years from now society might look at your stance as sick and outdated?

Have you ever read any history books?

You know that thing called slavery that we all now see as evil and repugnant? Well a few centuries ago this was just business as usual and no one had much issue with it.

Dude you're literally defending :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:philia.
 
Dude you're literally defending :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:philia.
I honestly tried dude, but you're a straight up dishonest little bitch who misrepresents and tries to strawman every single argument because you're intellectually way too bankrupt to address what I'm actually saying.

The funny thing is I wasn't even trying to play gotcha or anything, just asked straight forward questions. Silly of me for expecting someone with views like yours to respond any different, you're just a coward, and not a very intelligent one at that.
 
I like Led Zeppelin's music, I'm not attached to their personal lives in any way and don't really give a shit since as you said, it was pretty much the norm at the time.

Now can you answer my question.

IF a speed limit on a street is 100 km/h in 1970, and you drove 100 on that street in 1970, and that street has now been changed to a maximum 40 zone, ARE YOU GUILTY OF SPEEDING because you drove 100 on it back when it was allowed?

It's a yes or no question.
No.


It was socially accepted but still criminal back then.... so your analogy is flawed.

And yes . People who committed crimes such as ped in the 70's get charged with it now... as they should be.

Otherwise a fuck tonne of priests woulda got away with it...
 
No.


It was socially accepted but still criminal back then.... so your analogy is flawed.

And yes . People who committed crimes such as ped in the 70's get charged with it now... as they should be.

Otherwise a fuck tonne of priests woulda got away with it...
Cool, then the question is why are they not being charged with it?
 
I honestly tried dude, but you're a straight up dishonest little bitch who misrepresents and tries to strawman every single argument because you're intellectually way too bankrupt to address what I'm actually saying.

The funny thing is I wasn't even trying to play gotcha or anything, just asked straight forward questions. Silly of me for expecting someone with views like yours to respond any different, you're just a coward, and not a very intelligent one at that.

Dude I don't want to hear you complaining about "views like mine" when you're trying to explain away fucking a 14 year old child.

You've exposed yourself big time here.
 
Cool, then the question is why are they not being charged with it?
because nobody has pressed criminal charges....

Just like for decades bill cosby was free and not charged. I mean his victims were in the 1960s. So you could use the exact same logic right up till he was charged...

But if they were fucking underage girls . In the 70s 80s. Depending on the laws of said state / country .. it was criminal then and its criminal now.

If it wasnt a criminal act then they cant be charged.... if it was criminal then yes they can and should be.

( like the priests cosby etc )
 
Dude I don't want to hear you complaining about "views like mine" when you're trying to explain away fucking a 14 year old child.

You've exposed yourself big time here.
Only from the safety of your keyboard and in the fake world of online, can a little gnat like you make such a false accusation against someone like me, and not have your face instantly caved in.

Not much I can do other than take comfort in knowing that places like this is all you have, and instead of hate I guess I should only feel pity for your sad little existence.
 
Only from the safety of your keyboard and in the fake world of online, can a little gnat like you make such a false accusation against someone like me, and not have your face instantly caved in.

Not much I can do other than take comfort in knowing that places like this is all you have, and instead of hate I guess I should only feel pity for your sad little existence.

Dude read back the bit where you implied that it's fine if he fucked a 14 year old if it was acceptable at the time.

I doubt you'd cave my face in but keep acting hard, just do us all a favour and stay away from playgrounds.
 
because nobody has pressed criminal charges....

Just like for decades bill cosby was free and not charged. I mean his victims were in the 1960s. So you could use the exact same logic right up till he was charged...

But if they were fucking underage girls . In the 70s 80s. Depending on the laws of said state / country .. it was criminal then and its criminal now.

If it wasnt a criminal act then they cant be charged.... if it was criminal then yes they can and should be.

( like the priests cosby etc )
Fair enough, IF they did then it was a crime. IF they get charged, they will deal with the consequences.

The shitstain who this thread was initially about was charged, and found guilty, as was Cosby, etc...
 
Dude read back the bit where you implied that it's fine if he fucked a 14 year old if it was acceptable at the time.

I doubt you'd cave my face in but keep acting hard, just do us all a favour and stay away from playgrounds.
Ya ok, triple my post count in just a fraction of time spent here. You're pathetic and this is all you have, type whatever makes you feel big in your pathetic little world.
 
Ya ok, triple my post count in just a fraction of time spent here. You're pathetic and this is all you have, type whatever makes you feel big in your pathetic little world.

You're the dude who started trying to act hard dude lmao.

Irl I'm a purple belt in BJJ. If you're a good wrestler you might be okay, if you're not you're getting tapped.
 
You're the dude who started trying to act hard dude lmao.

Irl I'm a purple belt in BJJ. If you're a good wrestler you might be okay, if you're not you're getting tapped.
Likely story, and one that doesn't matter even if true. No amount of fighting ability can make up for being a dishonest little gnat... you have zero honour as a human being.
 
Likely story, and one that doesn't matter even if true. No amount of fighting ability can make up for being a dishonest little gnat... you have zero honour as a human being.

Dude anyone who reads the thread can see what you said.

You could have accepted that Jimmy Page is a nonce and chosen to still enjoy his music but you attempted to justify him being a nonce and that was a poor decision you're going to have to live with.

You can call me a gnat all you want but I'd rather be a gnat than someone who went to bat for a nonce on a public forum.
 
Back
Top