Social Nick Fuentes is getting way too popular

[BFoe]

Perhaps he is addressing concerns that are not addressed or adequately addressed by other sides of the political spectrum. The left dropped the working and lower middle classes in favor of so called minorities and the highly educated and privileged. with the lowering standards of living, rising house prices, criminality etc where would his demographic go?

No we didn’t (referring to bolded part above).
We just had a whole government shutdown fight trying to protect the interests of working class people.

The entire Republican economic policy for the past half century is to slash benefits for working class people while offering massive tax cuts to the wealthy—our economic plan is the opposite, and the economy had performed better under Dem administrations than Republican ones for nearly a century now.

We’re the ones passing massive infrastructure bills to improve communities, create jobs, and bolster economies. We support unions, we support wage increases, we support expanding healthcare benefits, we support entitlement programs, ideas like federally guaranteed maternity leave… I could go on and on. Wtf do republicans ever do for the working class?

 

[Sinister]

No we didn’t (referring to bolded part above).
We just had a whole government shutdown fight trying to protect the interests of working class people.

The entire Republican economic policy for the past half century is to slash benefits for working class people while offering massive tax cuts to the wealthy—our economic plan is the opposite, and the economy had performed better under Dem administrations than Republican ones for nearly a century now.

We’re the ones passing massive infrastructure bills to improve communities, create jobs, and bolster economies. We support unions, we support wage increases, we support expanding healthcare benefits, we support entitlement programs, ideas like federally guaranteed maternity leave… I could go on and on. Wtf do republicans ever do for the working class?

Forcefully assure them that giving all their money to people who are already wealthy while they elect not to treat their cancer because it's too expensive is a good thing.

 

[ShadowRun]

No we didn’t (referring to bolded part above).
We just had a whole government shutdown fight trying to protect the interests of working class people.

The entire Republican economic policy for the past half century is to slash benefits for working class people while offering massive tax cuts to the wealthy—our economic plan is the opposite, and the economy had performed better under Dem administrations than Republican ones for nearly a century now.

We’re the ones passing massive infrastructure bills to improve communities, create jobs, and bolster economies. We support unions, we support wage increases, we support expanding healthcare benefits, we support entitlement programs, ideas like federally guaranteed maternity leave… I could go on and on. Wtf do republicans ever do for the working class?

In the middle of work stuff but one easy thing to tackle is GOP policies (e.g., Reagan's 1981 cuts, Bush's 2001/2003, Trump's 2017 TCJA) reduced rates across brackets but disproportionately benefited high earners (top 1% got ~25% of TCJA benefits per IRS data). However, middle/working-class filers saw the largest percentage reductions (e.g., standard deduction doubled in 2017, aiding ~80% of households under $100K). IRS data shows all brackets benefited, with economic mobility up post-TCJA (e.g., more low earners moved to middle brackets).

/https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-simplified-the-tax-filing-process-for-millions-of-americans/

IRS data proves Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most​

IRS data proves Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most

Republicans’ 2017 tax reform law did exactly what was promised: It lowered taxes for all income groups.

thehill.com

Also Nick is a POS can't believe there are posters here who stick up for him and like him, incels need a hero too I guess.

 

[sanguinius]

No we didn’t (referring to bolded part above).
We just had a whole government shutdown fight trying to protect the interests of working class people.

The entire Republican economic policy for the past half century is to slash benefits for working class people while offering massive tax cuts to the wealthy—our economic plan is the opposite, and the economy had performed better under Dem administrations than Republican ones for nearly a century now.

We’re the ones passing massive infrastructure bills to improve communities, create jobs, and bolster economies. We support unions, we support wage increases, we support expanding healthcare benefits, we support entitlement programs, ideas like federally guaranteed maternity leave… I could go on and on. Wtf do republicans ever do for the working class?

Leftists don’t do shit for the working class, all you do is support homosexuals and import scum to take jobs.
At best, the government drones you support give lip service to the needs of the working class while pushing their insulated big-government shit, which has been proven again and again to be poison to real workers.

There’s a reason only the elites and the dregs supported leftist causes. You aren’t for the working man, you are for the boot on the working man’s neck.

 

[BFoe]

In the middle of work stuff but one easy thing to tackle is GOP policies (e.g., Reagan's 1981 cuts, Bush's 2001/2003, Trump's 2017 TCJA) reduced rates across brackets but disproportionately benefited high earners (top 1% got ~25% of TCJA benefits per IRS data). However, middle/working-class filers saw the largest percentage reductions (e.g., standard deduction doubled in 2017, aiding ~80% of households under $100K). IRS data shows all brackets benefited, with economic mobility up post-TCJA (e.g., more low earners moved to middle brackets).

/https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-simplified-the-tax-filing-process-for-millions-of-americans/

IRS data proves Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most​

IRS data proves Trump tax cuts benefited middle, working-class Americans most

Republicans’ 2017 tax reform law did exactly what was promised: It lowered taxes for all income groups.

thehill.com

Also Nick is a POS can't believe there are posters here who stick up for him and like him, incels need a hero too I guess.

Nick Fuentes is definitely a POS, agree on that.

The article about the tax plan is an opinion piece written by a right wing author (he’s the editor in chief at StoppingSocialism.com and co-wrote a book with Glenn Beck about how Joe Biden is supposedly a fascist). I don’t think our author is being very honest.

Here’s a look from some non-partisan sources.

https://www.cbpp.org/blog/the-2017-tax-law-did-not-boost-the-economy#:~:text=These%20effects%20were%20never%20borne%20out%20in,with%20incomes%20in%20the%20top%201%20percent.

Some highlights:

• “Though the Trump Administration promised the corporate rate cut would “very conservatively” lead to a $4,000 boost in household income, a study by economists from the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Federal Reserve Board found that workers in the bottom 90th percentile of their firm’s income scale saw “no change in earnings” from the rate cut.”
• “A recent Tax Policy Center analysis of the individual provisions’ distributional effects finds that households with incomes in the bottom quintile received only $100, while households with incomes in the top 1 percent received $61,500. This skewed distribution was due to rate reductions, the deduction for pass-through firms, and corporate tax cuts.“
• “Proponents of the 2017 tax law made a lot of promises about how it would boost the economy. These effects were never borne out in the data; there was no significant impact on GDP growth, investment, or wages. Instead, the 2017 tax law reduced federal revenues and exacerbated income and wealth inequality by giving more money to households with incomes in the top 1 percent.”

Let’s check out the effects of extending this policy, also from a nonpartisan source.

Those Making $450,000 And Up Would Get Nearly Half The Benefit Of Extending the TCJA

Households making about $450,000 or more would receive more than 45 percent of the benefits of extending key provisions of 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs...

taxpolicycenter.org

As noted, extending the TCJA cuts taxes like so does the following:

Top .1% of earners: 3% tax cut
Top 1% of earners: 3.2% tax cut
Middle income households: 1.3% tax cut

And let us not forget the tariffs. The average family pays anywhere from $1000-$3000/year extra because of the tariffs.

TLDR: working class people basically got nothing, once again.

 

[Snubnoze707]

I don't particularly like or hate him. Haven't spent any time really listening to him to form a strong opinion, but the notion that people are "platforming" him when he's bigger than the people that are supposedly doing it for him is laughable.

I'm just happy to see that despite trying to cancel someone from every platform and cutting off his ability to use banking over speech, it hasn't worked.

The days of cancelling over speech and mainstream media holding the narrative is over, and that's a good thing. Going to be a mixed bag of good and bad ideas, but that's always been the case for everything.

 

[SuperAlly]

He's 27 years old and a Nazi and he has a growing influence on conservatives. He's been very open about his beliefs and praise for Shitler. The GOP also has a very clear fascism problem already.

I don't know why you are pretending to care

Theres legions of nazis on here who you share opinions with

 

[Crazy Source]

I don't particularly like or hate him. Haven't spent any time really listening to him to form a strong opinion, but the notion that people are "platforming" him when he's bigger than the people that are supposedly doing it for him is laughable.

I'm just happy to see that despite trying to cancel someone from every platform and cutting off his ability to use banking over speech, it hasn't worked.

The days of cancelling over speech and mainstream media holding the narrative is over, and that's a good thing. Going to be a mixed bag of good and bad ideas, but that's always been the case for everything.

People don't have the right to use platforms. There are TOS just like there are here. People get banned here all the time. Do you find that unfair? Are they getting canceled?

 

[Snubnoze707]

People don't have the right to use platforms. There are TOS just like there are here. People get banned here all the time. Do you find that unfair? Are they getting canceled?

He's created his own platform so that's all irrelevant now. He can't be cancelled.

Preventing him from banking is some extreme censorship though, wouldn't you agree?

 

[Crazy Source]

He's created his own platform so that's all irrelevant now. He can't be cancelled.

Preventing him from banking is some extreme censorship though, wouldn't you agree?

My point is that platforms have a right to ban anyone. It's in the TOS.

 

[Snubnoze707]

My point is that platforms have a right to ban anyone. It's in the TOS.

I'm not talking about Sherdog, LOL.

The cancellation of Nick Fuentes went beyond any social media TOS, they legit cut his ability to bank off.

Do you think it's OK to prevent people from banking over speech?

 

[Crazy Source]

I'm not talking about Sherdog, LOL.

The cancellation of Nick Fuentes went beyond any social media TOS, they legit cut his ability to bank off.

Do you think it's OK to prevent people from banking over speech?

Outlets censoring him for being a racist scumbag is A-OK with me. Get a real fucking job.

 

[Satanical Eve]

And yet, Trump is President. The guy who made the rounds on social media, against the gal who didn't, and relied on the MSM to prop her up. The MSM has no pull whatsoever.

Fox News is MSM

 

[nostradumbass]

My point is that platforms have a right to ban anyone. It's in the TOS.

Unless it's a network suspending a host that loses them like $20 million per year, then it's fascism and collecting a $16 million salary for a failing show is a yooman right.

 

[fingercuffs]

He's created his own platform so that's all irrelevant now. He can't be cancelled.

Preventing him from banking is some extreme censorship though, wouldn't you agree?

He even outsources his social media company to workers in Mexico, no less. He's a man of the people!

 

[Snubnoze707]

Outlets censoring him for being a racist scumbag is A-OK with me. Get a real fucking job.

I'll ask you for a third time since you avoided the question twice already... Do you think it is OK to cut off banking from people over speech?

I'm not talking about "outlets" I'm not talking about "social media" I'm talking about banks.

 

[Crazy Source]

I'll ask you for a third time since you avoided the question twice already... Do you think it is OK to cut off banking from people over speech?

I'm not talking about "outlets" I'm not talking about "social media" I'm talking about banks.

Seems a bit harsh, but legal. They have the right to refuse service. Guess it pays to be a racist scumbag until it doesn't. It looks like 5 banks has refused service. Guess he should find one that will deal with him. I'm not shedding any tears here.

 

[HereticBD]

Fox News is MSM

No shit.

 

[Andy Capp]

Did you have a stroke typing this?Who talked about Roberts and the Heritage Foundation not "Fiundation"?

The left allows itself to be taken over by radical people all the time and has a hard time denouncing it. You got a Nazi guy with a tattoo running for a position, don't know what a woman is, allow men in women's sports, trans kids. You guys can't stand up to that and bend the knee. There is no place for this POS Fuentes and people are speaking out he doesn't align with right-wing conservative people or ideas. You should be able to agree people like this or the crazies on the left should be drummed out.

I would think you would reply to posters who are trying to use Nick's talking points to try and "debate" (they are using that wrong and sound stupid) than to try and attack people who don't like the guy. But then again you probably want him to get more popular because you like the fighting of it all.

LMAO @ this tool criticising typos but regularly misuses apostrophes.

To be fair, though, that's probably when the other shift is on this account. They don't know the difference between then and than most of the time.

 

[HereticBD]

LMAO @ this tool criticising typos but regularly misuses apostrpphes.

LOL....too easy.