Ngannou with the R1 KO over Jon Jones

[Juice]

Wins on roids = not a legitimate win. So are you saying his record is 0 - 0, the same as mine.

Do you have any proof Jones has ever won a fight on roids? I'm sure you don't, but I'll wait to see what bullshit you come up with.

 

[Juice]

Thiago Santos won a judges scorecard against him

Your hero Santos loss and got sent to the hospital with not one but two injured legs. I know the truth hurts.

 

[Yellowcrab]

No, every other fighter didn't test positive once. Only Jones has tested positive 3 times. You have more excuses?

Unfortunately for you, he was only guilty for recreational use of cocaine : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jon_Jones#Failed_drug_tests

If you want to stick with facts, that's it... you know, since we can't accuse other fighters = innocent until proven otherwise

 

[Yellowcrab]

Nate Diaz oneliners don't count as evidence for "every other fighter" being on steroids bro. It's ok, Jones is still a great fighter and a great champion. Just not the best.

He is according to these 2 videos that have the most of views on this subject on Youtube:

 

[Crash Lance]

No, every other fighter didn't test positive once. Only Jones has tested positive 3 times. You have more excuses?

There were 3 or 4 different occasions when Barnett was proven to be a drug addict. There are even some users on Sherdog that say, "Josh Barnett being a drug addict is the main reason that an entire organization was erased."

Needless to say, the organization that was erased was Affliction MMA.

 

[kflo]

As far as I see all that was said is that the results "appear to be consistent with Mr. Jones' contention" which is a far cry from him saying that Jon didn't do it. So hiw about you stop repeating your lie?

Again, he can not know a persons intentions and acting like he can would make the arbitration itself an irrelevant farce as far as the truth is concerned. I don't know how often I have to reiterate that for you get it. It should be self evident.

I quoted the actual report.

 

[20falarVerdades]

No, every other fighter didn't test positive once. Only Jones has tested positive 3 times. You have more excuses?

We know for a fact that Belfort had superhuman levels of testosterone against Jon Jones. Still, Jones completely destroyed him.

"Only Jones tested positive more than once therefore he's the only one on 'roids''

Your reasoning is just dishonest, idiosyncratic and not even true. Keep coping. Fact is, Jones has remained undefeated against the highest level of competition on an equal playing field

 

[Here's Johnny!]

We know for a fact that Belfort had superhuman levels of testosterone against Jon Jones. Still, Jones completely destroyed him.

"Only Jones tested positive more than once therefore he's the only one on 'roids''

Your reasoning is just dishonest, idiosyncratic and not even true. Keep coping. Fact is, Jones has remained undefeated against the highest level of competition on an equal playing field

You either don't know the definition of idiosyncratic or don't know how to use the term.... people judging Jon Jones for his steroid tests is not individual or peculiar... its commonplace and widely discussed. Also "dishonest and not even true" kind of writing the same thing twice... and how can someone's reasoning be dishonest and untrue? Do you mean his arguments are dishonest? Were you drunk when this was posted?

 

[20falarVerdades]

You either don't know the definition of idiosyncratic or don't know how to use the term.... people judging Jon Jones for his steroid tests is not individual or peculiar... its commonplace and widely discussed. Also "dishonest and not even true" kind of writing the same thing twice... and how can someone's reasoning be dishonest and untrue? Do you mean his arguments are dishonest? Were you drunk when this was posted?

It is individual and peculiar when you single out Jones and completely disregard all of the known PED users he has completely destroyed. Just flat out dishonest reasoning. That and, Jones has only tested positive for steroids (Tbol) once, the other substance was not an anabolic steroid. Keep coping

 

[Here's Johnny!]

It is individual and peculiar when you single out Jones and completely disregard all of the known PED users he has completely destroyed. Just flat out dishonest reasoning. That and, Jones has only tested positive for steroids (Tbol) once, the other substance was not an anabolic steroid. Keep coping

I didnt complain about Jon Jones... you don't know how to write. Jon Jones is innocent.

 

[Deleted member 506663]

We know for a fact that Belfort had superhuman levels of testosterone against Jon Jones. Still, Jones completely destroyed him.

"Only Jones tested positive more than once therefore he's the only one on 'roids''

Your reasoning is just dishonest, idiosyncratic and not even true. Keep coping. Fact is, Jones has remained undefeated against the highest level of competition on an equal playing field

Lights are on but no one's home, with that goof, bro.

These infuriated guys have been so disappointed that Bones hasn't lost...they decided to lose, their mind.

Kinda like Murica's political system.

 

[TheComputerGuy]

We know for a fact that Belfort had superhuman levels of testosterone against Jon Jones. Still, Jones completely destroyed him.

"Only Jones tested positive more than once therefore he's the only one on 'roids''

Your reasoning is just dishonest, idiosyncratic and not even true. Keep coping. Fact is, Jones has remained undefeated against the highest level of competition on an equal playing field

Nothing you said was true. Belfort didn’t test positive and wasn’t suspended.

Jones isn’t undefeated

 

[TheComputerGuy]

There were 3 or 4 different occasions when Barnett was proven to be a drug addict. There are even some users on Sherdog that say, "Josh Barnett being a drug addict is the main reason that an entire organization was erased."

Needless to say, the organization that was erased was Affliction MMA.

Yes. Jones is as much of a drug cheat as Barnett.

 

[Cracked_Rib]

I quoted the actual report.

You did, but nowhere in there does it state that it's highly unlikely Jon cheated or what his intentions were, only that the test results "appear to be consistent with Mr. Jones' contentions" that he doesn't know how it got into his system (lol) and that he didn't intentionally systematically cheat inside a very specific timeframe (lol).

If an athlete claims he doesn't know how a steroid ended up in his system and can't produce a tainted supplement it's irrelevant what he or she contends. Any person with two brain cells can count one and one together.

 

[kflo]

You did, but nowhere in there does it state that it's highly unlikely Jon cheated or what his intentions were, only that the test results "appear to be consistent with Mr. Jones' contentions", whatever that is supposed to mean.

If an athlete claims he doesn't know how a steroid ended up in his system and can't produce a tainted supplement it's be irrelevant what he or she contends. Any person with two brain cells can count one and one together. Any person except a mentally challenged or corrupt arbitrator that is.

Again:

44. Mr. Jones’ negative test results from July 6 and July 7 appear to be consistent with Mr. Jones’ contention that a therapeutic dose of an anabolic agent did not cause his positive test on July 28.

45. Additionally, the regular spacing of tests on Mr. Jones from December through July 7, 2017, all of which were negative, appears consistent with Mr. Jones’ contention that he did not engage in a systematic doping regimen using oral turinabol or anything other anabolic agent whose use can be detected through identification of the M3 metabolite.
​

Now, maybe you can point out which part of this you specifically disagree with and what evidence you have to support your view………..

 

[Cracked_Rib]

Again:

44. Mr. Jones’ negative test results from July 6 and July 7 appear to be consistent with Mr. Jones’ contention that a therapeutic dose of an anabolic agent did not cause his positive test on July 28.

45. Additionally, the regular spacing of tests on Mr. Jones from December through July 7, 2017, all of which were negative, appears consistent with Mr. Jones’ contention that he did not engage in a systematic doping regimen using oral turinabol or anything other anabolic agent whose use can be detected through identification of the M3 metabolite.
​

Now, maybe you can point out which part of this you specifically disagree with and what evidence you have to support your view………..

Again, all the arbitrator said here was that Jones' claim of not "systematically cheating" within a very specific time frame appear to be consistent with the test results. Nothing outside of that very specific time frame is covered. This basically leaves the door completely open for Jon doing "irregular cheating", as if that was so much better lol.

Again, nobody can know Jones' intentions except for Jon himself and acting like you do just makes you a fool. No matter who or what you are. The arbitrator seems to realize this since he didn't mention intent at all. He also didn't mention likelihood at all. Yet you are making assumptions about both those things, acting like the arbitrator said them. Why?

 

[kflo]

Again, all the arbitrator said here was that Jones' claim of not "systematically cheating" within a very specific time frame appear to be consistent with the test results. Nothing outside of that very specific time frame is covered. This basically leaves the door completely open for Jon doing "irregular cheating", as if that was so much better lol.

Again, nobody can know Jones' intentions except for Jon himself and acting like you do just makes you a fool. No matter who or what you are. The arbitrator seems to realize this since he didn't mention intent at all. He also didn't mention likelihood at all. Yet you are making assumptions about both those things, acting like the arbitrator said them. Why?

I keep posting the text from the actual agreement. What am I making up? Have you read the entire agreement?

 

[BigGucci]

Do you have any proof Jones has ever won a fight on roids? I'm sure you don't, but I'll wait to see what bullshit you come up with.

I'm sure he was completely clean except those 11 times he popped from steroids

 

[BigGucci]

We know for a fact that Belfort had superhuman levels of testosterone against Jon Jones. Still, Jones completely destroyed him.

"Only Jones tested positive more than once therefore he's the only one on 'roids''

Your reasoning is just dishonest, idiosyncratic and not even true. Keep coping. Fact is, Jones has remained undefeated against the highest level of competition on an equal playing field

*except the Dominick Reyes fight he didn't even win

**"equal playing field" meaning popping for steroids multiple times when your opponents don't and then being given an exemption to allow to you use steroids openly when your opponent can't

 

[Juice]

I'm sure he was completely clean except those 11 times he popped from steroids

Can you please show proof Jones popped 11 times for steroids?

Of course we know you are talking out of your ass. But I would love to see what BS you can come up with to prove your lie.