That would have been a acceptable call, but this was horseshit.Didn't Walt say it would have been an illegal formation even if the fellas reported?
If that's the case though the reporting doesn't matter because the play shouldn't have counted anywayThat would have been a acceptable call, but this was horseshit.
Exactly, that's fine. But this is bullshit.If that's the case though the reporting doesn't matter because the play shouldn't have counted anyway
So did the Lions really lose this game because the refs have a hearing problem? Is that for real, I immediately turned my TV off after the 2 point conversations.
I can't even. That should be overturned, complete bullshit!Yes. That's the reason ESPN is pushing. Both linemen walk up and tell the ref but he walks away so he conveniently doesn't hear them. How this moron keeps his job is beyond me. NFL gonna NFL.
Yes he wasn't covered so it would of been illegal formation. I actually thought that was the original call but I think they said illegal touch (either way it's the same 5 yard penalty)Didn't Walt say it would have been an illegal formation even if the fellas reported?
Not being covered is definitely not illegal formation and never a flag. Every blown coverage by the defense would mean the offense gets flagged for the D's mistake....Yes he wasn't covered so it would of been illegal formation. I actually thought that was the original call but I think they said illegal touch (either way it's the same 5 yard penalty)
That ref analyst was a brutal listen.SVP said, 'Does he need to do jumping Jack's?', after the ref consultant for ESPN said the 'responsibility is on the player' and he 'didn't hear him'.
Fuck off.
That ref analyst was a brutal listen.